The coming Middle East war

Paul_S

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
5,550
The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition
Michael Freund, THE JERUSALEM POST Oct. 18, 2006

The warning signs are everywhere, yet no one wishes to see them.
Israel's foes are gearing up for war, and it's time that we opened our
eyes to the danger that confronts us.

The conflict may be just weeks or even months away, or perhaps a bit
longer. How it will start is anyone's guess, but make no mistake, a
major outbreak of hostilities is almost certainly around the corner.

If this sounds like scare-mongering or even an advanced case of paranoia
to you, just take a glance at the newspapers from the past few weeks. If
you read them with a discerning eye, you will see exactly what I mean.

For whichever direction one chooses to look, be it north, south or east
of us, trouble - major trouble - is brewing.

In Lebanon, Hizbullah is busy rebuilding its expansive terrorist
infrastructure after this summer's fighting with Israel. Under the
protective shield of UN troops, the group has been welcoming large
shipments of weapons from Iran and Syria, and fortifying its bunkers in
advance of the next round of conflict.

In a speech delivered last month in Beirut, on September 22, Hizbullah
leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah asserted that his organization still has
"more than 20,000 rockets" and that it had "recovered all its
organizational and military capabilities."

Even if we allow for an element of boasting and exaggeration, there are
clear signs that Nasrallah is steadily engaged in rebuilding his forces.

Indeed, this past Sunday, Brig.-Gen. Yossi Baidatz, head of the IDF
intelligence directorate's research department, told the weekly Cabinet
meeting that, "There is conclusive and decisive evidence" that Syria is
rearming Hizbullah.

"The weapons smuggling from Syria into Lebanon," Baidatz said, "is
continuing with official Syrian involvement." He added that Damascus has
kept its forces on a war footing, with their artillery and missiles
deployed in forward battle positions.

Along these lines, Syrian President Bashar Assad has made a series of
public statements in recent weeks, speaking openly about the possibility
of military conflict with Israel and his desire to retake the Golan
Heights by force.

In an interview with the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Anba on October 6, Assad
said that Damascus was ready for war with the Jewish state. Previously,
he insisted that the Golan would be "liberated by Syrian arms," and
warned Israel to "seek peace or face the threat of defeat."

TURNING SOUTH toward Gaza, the situation is likewise disturbing.
Palestinian terrorists continue to fire Kassam rockets into the Negev on
a daily basis, hitting Israeli towns and communities such as Sderot and
Nir Am.

Since the start of the year, Hamas is said to have smuggled into Gaza
over 20 tons of explosives, anti-aircraft and anti-tank missiles.
According to media reports, Hamas has also assembled an armed military
force consisting of 7,500 fighters, which is said to include specialized
units such as snipers, missile batteries and anti-tank troops.

As Yediot Aharonot military correspondent Alex Fishman recently put it,
"The Palestinians are arming themselves to the teeth, building a
military force, defensive systems and preparing Hizbullah-style surprises."

Nor is Hamas hiding its intentions. In a statement issued on Monday, the
group's Izzadin al-Kassam brigades declared that it has the "means and
arms necessary to confront the Zionist enemy with all our force."

Saying they are "totally ready to resist," Hamas added somewhat
ominously that, "We have finished preparations to teach the Zionist
enemy a lesson it will not forget."

And then, of course, there is the threat from Teheran to our east, where
the Iranian president speaks of wiping Israel off the map even as he
continues to pursue his nuclear ambitions.

If anyone thinks that Mr. Ahmadinejad is open to compromise, they should
take a look at his latest ramblings. Speaking at a mosque in Teheran on
Monday, the Iranian leader insisted that he had received a Divine
message indicating that his country would prevail. "One day," he said,
"I will be asked whether I have been in touch with someone who told me
we would win, and I will respond: 'Yes, I have been in touch with God'."

As if all this were not enough, there have been persistent reports in
recent months about a growing al-Qaida presence in the territories, as
the international terrorist group seeks to position itself for launching
strikes against the Jewish state.

And so, Israel now finds itself surrounded by an arc of hate stretching
from Beirut and Damascus in the north, to Teheran in the east, and back
to Gaza in the south. Along each chord of this arc, our foes are
diligently arming themselves and preparing for battle, both verbally and
in practice. It seems safe to assume that these coordinated efforts are
no coincidence, and that they are all linked to the seemingly inevitable
confrontation that is looming over the region regarding Iran's nuclear
program.

Just as Iran sought to send a message to Israel and the US this summer
by provoking an outbreak of hostilities in Lebanon, so too Teheran now
appears determined to lay the groundwork for a much greater, and far
more ambitious, flare-up, one that would threaten to consume the entire
region. The Iranians presumably view this as their trump card, thinking
that it will give them the means of forestalling a possible US or
Israeli attack on their nuclear facilities.

As a result, they have been working to strengthen the extremists
throughout the region, who share their desire to hit America and Israel.
In all probability, they are merely waiting for the opportune moment
with which to set in motion the next provocative act, which will be
aimed at igniting the entire Middle East.

HOW SHOULD Israel react to this growing threat? First, we must learn the
lesson of this summer's Lebanon war, which was disastrous precisely
because we sat back and allowed our enemies to build up their military
infrastructure over time.

Instead of making this same mistake once again, Israel should take
whatever steps are necessary to interdict weapons shipments to the
terrorists, seal off their supply routes, and hit hard at those who are
sending them the weapons in the first place.

Second, the government needs to begin seriously contemplating the
possibility of launching preemptive and wide-ranging military strikes.
Our foes are openly preparing for war, so why should we allow them the
luxury to choose when it starts?

Passivity and indecisiveness cost us dearly in the past, and especially
in Lebanon this summer. We can not allow ourselves to play by the
enemy's rules, or even by his schedule, should this scenario once again
come to pass.

I truly hope that I am wrong, and that diplomacy and common sense will
somehow prevail. The last thing Israel needs right now is another
painful conflict, and we should all pray to God for His mercy and
intervention.

But as in the past, our enemies may leave us with no other choice but to
fight. This time around, let's just make sure we are ready for the
challenge.

Original article :
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1159193465378&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
 

Paul_S

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
5,550
Israel are in a nice tight spot - if they do nothing they're in trouble and if they try to stop the enemy building up weapons (like their last excursion into Lebanon) they're in trouble with foreign governments, UN, etc. No way forwards and no way backwards.

Think R7 per liter of fuel is bad? :D
 

nivek

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
10,271
if those countries do start a war, pretty sure Israel wont hold back like they did in Lebanon..

when it comes to protecting its civilians from attacks from all its neighbours i dont think its going to be too worried about its neighbours civilians when retaliating..

so much hate in the arab world...
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
There is almost certainly going to be a major war. The question is how bad is it going to be. Here are the scenarios.

1. The U.S( with or without the U.N) is forced into war with Iran over nukes. That will set the middle east off.

2. The U.S allows Iran to develop nukes. The U.S or Isreal wil be hit by a terrorist nuke forcing them into a war with a nuke armed Iran.

3. Iran gives up their nukes. By far the least likely( ask Korea) but the best possible scenario.

That is my opinion(simplified) that the war will be set off by Iran. Some would say it has already started in Iraq but I think you wlll see a far more costly war with Iran that will ingulf the whole area.
 

Syndyre

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
16,821
There is almost certainly going to be a major war. The question is how bad is it going to be. Here are the scenarios.

1. The U.S( with or without the U.N) is forced into war with Iran over nukes. That will set the middle east off.

2. The U.S allows Iran to develop nukes. The U.S or Isreal wil be hit by a terrorist nuke forcing them into a war with a nuke armed Iran.

3. Iran gives up their nukes. By far the least likely( ask Korea) but the best possible scenario.

That is my opinion(simplified) that the war will be set off by Iran. Some would say it has already started in Iraq but I think you wlll see a far more costly war with Iran that will ingulf the whole area.

Don't think the Iranians are crazy enough to actually nuke Israel or the US as a "first strike" although its certainly possible I suppose.

Iraq seems to have emboldened Iran, its clear the US won't have a major long term power base there with bases etc. so Iran seems to be aiming for the role of regional power, they can probably expect support from the Shiites in Iraq too.

Wouldn't be surprised if they attack Israel indirectly through proxies such as Hezbollah etc. to try and avert a direct attack on themselves.
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
Don't think the Iranians are crazy enough to actually nuke Israel or the US as a "first strike" although its certainly possible I suppose.

Iraq seems to have emboldened Iran, its clear the US won't have a major long term power base there with bases etc. so Iran seems to be aiming for the role of regional power, they can probably expect support from the Shiites in Iraq too.

Wouldn't be surprised if they attack Israel indirectly through proxies such as Hezbollah etc. to try and avert a direct attack on themselves.

MAD isn't very effective against religious zealots. Plus they have seen the West's unwillingness for a fight. A nuke armed Iran is the biggest threat yet to not having nuke warfare. It is a very dangerous time and it looks like it is only going to get worse.
 

Syndyre

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
16,821
True, think North Korea in comparison is fairly harmless, they don't seem to be that interested in the rest of the world as long as their regime stays propped up. Iran certainly seems to have more imperialistic ambitions though.
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
N.K by their ideology power is everything. I'm sure they don't believe in an afterlife. The most important consideration is their power and whats the point of power if everything is destroyed including themselves.

Islamic fundamentalist do not have the same fervor for life. They don't fear death and are quite happy it seems to go into the afterlife.

Saying that not all of them think like that, many in fact have much in common with N.K leaders and are just using this Islamic ideology for power. Lets hope these guys are the majority because that would be better for all of us.
 

OhGats

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
935
All I know is, whoever presses the nuclear button will unleash a terrible fate not only on Israel but the whole middle east will be poisoned by radioactive fallout and the after effects of a bomb and the resulting anarchy will drag the whole world down into something too horrible to contemplate.
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
When people talk nukes they seem to forget there are various types, levels of destructive power and radioactive fallout.

Isreal has nukes but how many? What Type? How big? How radioactive? Do they have H-bombs? Same with Iran.

That all has relevance on the overall destruction delivered to the warzone or countries.
 

Syndyre

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
16,821
N.K by their ideology power is everything. I'm sure they don't believe in an afterlife. The most important consideration is their power and whats the point of power if everything is destroyed including themselves.

Islamic fundamentalist do not have the same fervor for life. They don't fear death and are quite happy it seems to go into the afterlife.

Saying that not all of them think like that, many in fact have much in common with N.K leaders and are just using this Islamic ideology for power. Lets hope these guys are the majority because that would be better for all of us.

True but I think Ahmidenijad is more the type that thinks he has 100 virgins waiting for him if he nukes Israel. Unless its all rhetoric.
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
True but I think Ahmidenijad is more the type that thinks he has 100 virgins waiting for him if he nukes Israel. Unless its all rhetoric.

Lets hope so. But either way he must not get nukes.
 
Top