bb_matt said:If this turns out to be their methodology, then I was right in my belief that they are pulling a "sentech" on you guys, just like Sentech did with us geeks who signed up with it.
My theory is that they don't want high bandwidth users on their network at all, because they cannot supply them - they'll go bust.
What they want is joe average users who do light surfing and email.
Crash said:Rebel. I should have put a <sarcastic> at the end![]()
It works most of the time as local access is usually fine. It's definately better than a direct international connection via WBS.Crash said:BTW, does the local proxy stuff work alright?
AJD said:OK .well i did UL 43Gig and DL 39 Gig. I have connectivity at 64k but they have switched off my iburst to iburst totally and have indicated that any attempt to bypass the bandwidth usage monitor is abuse and they will terminate my contract. Looks like normal usage for me again.
alchamy said:Erm, Iburst to Iburst is free traffic. WBS does not pay for this traffic.![]()