The energy solution for South Africa is DC power.

Seriously

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,596
Exactly, and all of these misconceptions were responded to and shown inaccurate but you keep digging them up as if they are valid. You haven't actually quoted anything you claimed you were going to quote.

Only in your head and only you believe yourself.

I responded with these quotes to show you again how your circular arguments and BS you post confuse your neurons as you consistently claimed I raised the issue of the high power appliances. I now showed you it's not true and that you are talking BS once again. I merely repeated the same questions by using your own examples hoping for clarity Up to now you still have not substantiated any of your BS claims. Your strawmen rhetoric you use as a tactic as your escape route to detract from and willfully refuse to answer the direct questions asked. It's very clear for everyone to see and it's the exactly the same methods you deploy in PD as that is all you can and know how to do when you cannot answer the questions posed to you. Here again you diverted from the direct questions I asked in my prior post.

So let's turn to some questions to see if your support is validly placed:

It's very clear from member responses to your unsubstantiated BS claims in this thread that your "support" is not validly placed at all and some members actually stated bluntly that you are trolling this thread. The fact that most left the thread not willing to respond to your BS claims and fiction should also be a clear indicator for you.

Do you agree with lsheed that DC requires solid core cabling?

You can use solid core or stranded cables but there are pros and cons for both depending on certain environmental and installation circumstances or limitations. Thus this will depend on the specifications or criteria used by the designer/installer as well as his preferences and legal as well as physical design requirements and specifications. It is common knowledge that solid single core is used in long runs where the lack of flex will not be an issue. Maybe Isheed_cn could give you his suppliers number and he can then give you the reasons for his preference and clarify his decision first hand. See in this link if you can spot the clues as maybe why some suppliers recommends or have preference for the solid core or stranded cable.

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wire-gauges-d_419.html

Do you agree with him that DC requires more cabling?

You yourself have agreed! :confused: You stated yourself that specific modifications need to be made to accommodate the use of 12VDC by altering the plug sockets to a different type so that accidents can be prevented in case someone plugs the wrong device in the wrong socket. You also stated that you "suddenly" support a dual system of 220VAC and 12VDC after you realised the fallacy of your claims. Now explain to me how it would be possible to achieve without pulling in additional copper wire for the 12VDC circuits to add to the existing 220VAC circuits. (Maybe you want to consider multiplexing?) You will also have to chase new conduit to accommodate the extra circuit wire and install the extra special plug points as well as accommodate new breakers or fuses in the DB board? Do you see where your circular reasoning and arguments leads to? I doubt sincerely by now.

Thus to answer your question then there is no way to get away without extra costs and wiring to have a dual system as explained. The same applies if you are converting an existing circuit to 12VDC as a "total solution" to compensate for the copper resistance and I2R heat losses. THUS I agree with his statement for the simple reasons that follows:

-I have already shown you in calculations and explained that the current limitations of the standard 2.5MM2 copper wire at 12VDC due to the copper resistance and thus I2R heat losses requires higher capacity cable for even low nominal wattages (360W at 12VDC 30Amps Your example)

-Considering the fact that in a home environment where a single 2.5mm2 wire pair is used to feed various sections of a home limits the the amount of devices you can use on such a line is at any one time.

Let me explain to you again that if I have my PC on one such circuit and my kid runs his laptop on the same circuit in his room and my wife starts the, "now modified 12VDC egg beater" in the kitchen on the same circuit I am going to lose power to my PC as the line capacity cannot handle the total load. So it must be safe to accept then, unless you are Swa, that the home would have to be split in more circuits requiring more wires of possibly higher capacity, than the 2.5MM2 wire can provide, to overcome the DC I2R losses due to the line resistance.

Thus in short you will need more circuits, thus extra "breakers" or trip devices and/or fuses and larger diameter wire of higher capacity. If you cannot grasp that simple concept by now then you never will.

Your solution would probably be:
-to only switch on one device at any one time per circuit depending on capacity required.
(maybe have a Eskom type load shedding table for the family so each have a fair share of the limited 12VDC capacity available to themselves for use on that one circuit.)
-Forego of egg beaters and all other "Swa deemed unnecessary" appliances
-Use 220VAC which most of the people adopting solar with inverters are doing anyway
-Still waiting for Swa's solutions to questions asked
-Waiting for Swa's new BS thumbsuck idea. (Like manufacturers will have to convert and design futuristic DC appliances, say how about a fusion powered egg beater?)

Do you agree that it would be necessary to rig most of the appliances we use or custom make them?

That is a claim someone else made and your response to that was that the manufacturers would have to adapt and people have to accept that they will have to do without those appliances and/or wait for the new era in 12VDc technology to arrive. You even stated, to confirm your BS argument, that there was power before appliances.

Many devices do have 12vdc motors and circuits internally and some may be modified to be used directly on a 12VDC bus. But again the circuit limitations of current capacity is the main problem. Stepping the power up to 220V or any other DC voltage at the point of use, still leaves you with the original problem of the reduced current capacity at a 12VDC source over the standard 2.5MM2 copper wire.

Careful how you answer them as they will determine whether or not you know anything
.

Most of us already established from your posts and BS arguments and thus confirmed that you know Fall about this topic and are just posting any thumbsuck BS idea entering your head to troll this thread.

Maybe just give us a summary of how you, DR Swa PhD in electrical, electronic and solar solutions, would see DC Power as the total solution for South Africa in the home environment. I will be waiting in angst as I do not expect anything forthcoming.
 
Last edited:

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,213
High voltage DC does require solid core cabling.
AC cabling doesn't due to skin effect.
Please feel free to completely misinterpret that again, as you have done so many times.
It doesn't. You are still misapplying the skin effect.

Any moderate size current draw requires more cabling (substantially more) if running on your 12v DC suggestion.
If you run at higher voltages eg 240v you could reuse standard size cables, although you'd still need solid core cable vs the more typical multistrand as in point #1.
Wasn't the question but I see you've put in a nice cover clause there.

If you're running at higher voltage DC (which would really be necessary) then all the devices will still need to have equipment inside to bring the voltage down to whatever levels they need to run at. Given that 3/4 of the world has standardized on 240v or 120v AC its going to be a hard battle to change that. You also lose all your benefits of changing in the first place.
Again not really the question.

Maybe just give us a summary of how you, DR Swa PhD in electrical, electronic and solar solutions, would see DC Power as the total solution for South Africa in the home environment. I will be waiting in angst as I do not expect anything forthcoming.
How about you stop using straw men and using the quote system correctly? I am not going to dig through all of your BS and misrepresentations here.
 

Seriously

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,596
How about you stop using straw men and using the quote system correctly? I am not going to dig through all of your BS and misrepresentations here.

So you cannot comprehend the post as you cannot even ID your own BS comments in the quotes? I expected another cop out so no sweat. I will help you with a more detailed summary in context to follow soon with all your gems of unsubstantiated false claims and responses to members sorted for clarity.
 

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,213
So you cannot comprehend the post as you cannot even ID your own BS comments in the quotes? I expected another cop out so no sweat. I will help you with a more detailed summary in context to follow soon with all your gems of unsubstantiated false claims and responses to members sorted for clarity.
No the fact that you interject your crap into my post making it deliberately hard to quote.
 

russellw1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
205
I have tried DC useing the 20 12v batteries in my masterguard UPS. Most electronic devices work (cfl lights, decoder, pc, hifi etc) except the old crt type pcs abd tvs get a magnetised screen which makes it either green or violet. That is caused by the degauss circuit which does the opposite of what it is meant to do but it fixes the problem if you use ac again. The other problem is arcing on the switch contacts so they burn out or stick closed.
 
Last edited:

Seriously

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,596
Some reality prevails!

This family lives completely off Eskom’s grid
http://businesstech.co.za/news/general/79319/this-family-lives-completely-off-eskoms-grid/

we started off with a couple of panels and a small battery bank and since then we have expanded that to a 5 kilowatt per hour array and we have a 2 kilowatt, vertical axis wind turbine that we combined with that.”

The family maintains that it runs a household similar to any other in the country, using appliances like fridges, TVs, hair dryers, Play Stations and washing machines, but they use energy in a more sustainable way including LED lights (370 throughout the house), a wood stove for cooking, a fireplace for warmth and gas usage for cooking and water heating.
 

Seriously

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,596
A wind turbine reality?

Why not? Does it not fit in with your 12VDC unworkable sham of a solution? I wonder if you can even come up with a guess why the wind turbine enhance their system. Do you even know how a wind turbine works? I doubt!

It's more of a reality than your proposed solutions, You see; they installed the system and it really works. That is REALITY, unlike your proposed thumsucked idiotic solutions with no proven installation anywhere, caravans excluded.

When are you going to do engineering calcs to prove to us the feasibility of your system?


Only someone with your mentality would ignore the rest of their achievement and bitch because they installed a wind turbine to enhance it.

How is your 12VDC solution coming on again?
 
Last edited:

Mike43110

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
504
I really think this thread should be renamed Swa vs. Seriously.

I am just going to leave this here.

AC vs. DC distribution: A loss comparison

There are advantages to DC over AC, there are advantages to AC over DC. Currently a DC system is unfeasible due to the fact that everything runs off of AC. A DC system could work and could make sense in the future once a fixed voltage is chosen and the grid is decentralized with some homes outputting their excess power.

So all this boils down to is. 12VDC is NOT a valid solution for distribution. Efficient step down converters from dc-dc exist. They exist for AC-DC too. Nobody posted efficiency numbers with a source. Electronics would greatly benefit from this change. Motors would not benefit. Single phase induction motors are common (albeit with disadvantages in startup requiring extra circuitry). Three phase motors are good. AC is necessary. DC is necessary. If I could be bothered to go back and look I am sure I could find many things both sides spewed that was unnecessary.

I was hoping to see an actual discussion on DC transmission. Instead I got to see an argument about low voltage carriers. There is a reason high voltage is used on transmission lines.

There is a case to be made for a DC grid. It is a valid topic for discussion. In fact that is just one paper I found on it where it shows that it's not unfeasible. It also politely mentions that there is an obvious issue in that nothing is designed for it at the moment. Generation would also be a big issue as AC is incumbent. There are valid interesting arguments that could have been had. Instead it was utterly pointless.

/rant over
 

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,213
Why not? Does it not fit in with your 12VDC unworkable sham of a solution? I wonder if you can even come up with a guess why the wind turbine enhance their system. Do you even know how a wind turbine works? I doubt!

It's more of a reality than your proposed solutions, You see; they installed the system and it really works. That is REALITY, unlike your proposed thumsucked idiotic solutions with no proven installation anywhere, caravans excluded.

When are you going to do engineering calcs to prove to us the feasibility of your system?


Only someone with your mentality would ignore the rest of their achievement and bitch because they installed a wind turbine to enhance it.

How is your 12VDC solution coming on again?
Yes wind turbines for every household. :rolleyes: We'll see what you have to say about that "reality" once your neighbors have turbines.

I really think this thread should be renamed Swa vs. Seriously.

I am just going to leave this here.

AC vs. DC distribution: A loss comparison

There are advantages to DC over AC, there are advantages to AC over DC. Currently a DC system is unfeasible due to the fact that everything runs off of AC. A DC system could work and could make sense in the future once a fixed voltage is chosen and the grid is decentralized with some homes outputting their excess power.

So all this boils down to is. 12VDC is NOT a valid solution for distribution. Efficient step down converters from dc-dc exist. They exist for AC-DC too. Nobody posted efficiency numbers with a source. Electronics would greatly benefit from this change. Motors would not benefit. Single phase induction motors are common (albeit with disadvantages in startup requiring extra circuitry). Three phase motors are good. AC is necessary. DC is necessary. If I could be bothered to go back and look I am sure I could find many things both sides spewed that was unnecessary.

I was hoping to see an actual discussion on DC transmission. Instead I got to see an argument about low voltage carriers. There is a reason high voltage is used on transmission lines.

There is a case to be made for a DC grid. It is a valid topic for discussion. In fact that is just one paper I found on it where it shows that it's not unfeasible. It also politely mentions that there is an obvious issue in that nothing is designed for it at the moment. Generation would also be a big issue as AC is incumbent. There are valid interesting arguments that could have been had. Instead it was utterly pointless.

/rant over
Believe it or not that is the point I made before the straw men and red herrings started entering. Can agree with everything you say here except the unfeasibility part. There are enough appliances that can function off it so we don't have to wait. We can't expect universal support without implementation. The future is AC alongside DC and it will arrive dependent on us.

I did the calculations here and direct DC beats an AC inverter solution for efficiency. As for transmission we are not quite there yet for DC. DC transmission makes most sense for distances over 800km. Shorter distances the technology starts costing more than for AC. That may change soon though and DC will become a solution for transmission.
 

Mike43110

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
504
Yes wind turbines for every household. :rolleyes: We'll see what you have to say about that "reality" once your neighbors have turbines.


Believe it or not that is the point I made before the straw men and red herrings started entering. Can agree with everything you say here except the unfeasibility part. There are enough appliances that can function off it so we don't have to wait. We can't expect universal support without implementation. The future is AC alongside DC and it will arrive dependent on us.

I did the calculations here and direct DC beats an AC inverter solution for efficiency. As for transmission we are not quite there yet for DC. DC transmission makes most sense for distances over 800km. Shorter distances the technology starts costing more than for AC. That may change soon though and DC will become a solution for transmission.

I could have forgotten that with the drivel that the previous pages became...

So! What do you think would need to be done for generation? I haven't done anything really on generation so I am not sure how large scale DC generation is done.
 

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,213
I could have forgotten that with the drivel that the previous pages became...

So! What do you think would need to be done for generation? I haven't done anything really on generation so I am not sure how large scale DC generation is done.
I don't know quite what you mean with large scale generation. As I understand it generation is done through the usual means and then rectified and smoothed to DC. Solar generation though can benefit from DC distribution. No need to do any conversions to tie in to the grid.

For the time being though my suggestion was to run all low power devices off DC directly and this is why I suggested a separate 12V supply. Not a total solution like it was made out to be. As support for multiple voltages increase we can step up to something like 120VDC/230VAC.

Your main objection to DC was which voltage to standardise for use. I don't think we will see a standard voltage though in the future and instead each appliance will function on a range of voltages much like many AC appliances work off anything from 110V to 240V.
 
Last edited:

Mike43110

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
504
I don't know quite what you mean with large scale generation. As I understand it generation is done through the usual means and then rectified and smoothed to DC. Solar generation though can benefit from DC distribution. No need to do any conversions to tie in to the grid.

For the time being though my suggestion was to run all low power devices off DC directly and this is why I suggested a separate 12V supply. Not a total solution like it was made out to be. As support for multiple voltages increase we can step up to something like 120VDC/230VAC.

Aah!
So stick with current generation schemes then. Just change it to the most applicable type for distribution?
Well that would actually make a lot of sense honestly.
A local 12V rail would not be my scheme however for houses, I would stick with 240VDC or higher and then have the devices still step it down.
DC-DC is more efficient from what I can remember so the losses would be a lot better. Though I could be wrong, not dealing with power at the moment so I am a bit rusty.

The paper I linked to shows that 240VDC and higher is perfectly applicable for an office.
I think DC and AC together would be a bit complex for users but would be a better solution for electronics. I found that quite a large portion of my usage at least is all DC. For a place with motors, its a different story of course.
Each type has its uses after all.

I haven't looked up DC LEDs properly. I have been in a place though that actually did have a 12VDC lighting system that worked quite well.

A point to consider is the large number of transformers required in each device. A DC system will still require that voltage levels be changed but unless you use a transformer for isolation, that mass of copper can be removed or I hope at least lessened to some extent. There are a lot of transformers in all our DC devices after all!
 

Seriously

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,596
Yes wind turbines for every household. :rolleyes: We'll see what you have to say about that "reality" once your neighbors have turbines.


Believe it or not that is the point I made before the straw men and red herrings started entering. Can agree with everything you say here except the unfeasibility part. There are enough appliances that can function off it so we don't have to wait. We can't expect universal support without implementation. The future is AC alongside DC and it will arrive dependent on us.

I did the calculations here and direct DC beats an AC inverter solution for efficiency. As for transmission we are not quite there yet for DC. DC transmission makes most sense for distances over 800km. Shorter distances the technology starts costing more than for AC. That may change soon though and DC will become a solution for transmission.


Who said every household must install a turbine? You have issues due to the stuff your smoking! Many people have water turbines, many people use other means but in the end 99% have common sense to know 12V DC is not a feasible proposition. Of that remaining 1% 0.9 % have unique solutions and the only 0.1% of idiots remaining decided that 12V DC is the total solution and would solve our power crisis. Only one advocated running 30Amps @12VDC over 2.5mm2 wire is possible. Yet that "person" could never substantiate any arguments he thumbsucked.


What a Bshirter You have posted no calculations just a lot of BS, yet 85-90% of the questions and comments posted to you you obtusely refused to answer. What a sad existence to have.
 
Last edited:

Seriously

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,596
I don't know quite what you mean with large scale generation. As I understand it generation is done through the usual means and then rectified and smoothed to DC. Solar generation though can benefit from DC distribution. No need to do any conversions to tie in to the grid.

For the time being though my suggestion was to run all low power devices off DC directly and this is why I suggested a separate 12V supply. Not a total solution like it was made out to be. As support for multiple voltages increase we can step up to something like 120VDC/230VAC.

Your main objection to DC was which voltage to standardise for use. I don't think we will see a standard voltage though in the future and instead each appliance will function on a range of voltages much like many AC appliances work off anything from 110V to 240V.



So now that you have changed your mind tell us how are you going to achieve the above without having more copper wire and protection devices as you claimed adamantly that no additional copper or modifications will be required. How are you going to run the 12VDC circuits and 220V circuits in the same existing wires.

Circular reasoning.
 

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,213
Aah!
So stick with current generation schemes then. Just change it to the most applicable type for distribution?
Well that would actually make a lot of sense honestly.
A local 12V rail would not be my scheme however for houses, I would stick with 240VDC or higher and then have the devices still step it down.
DC-DC is more efficient from what I can remember so the losses would be a lot better. Though I could be wrong, not dealing with power at the moment so I am a bit rusty.

The paper I linked to shows that 240VDC and higher is perfectly applicable for an office.
I think DC and AC together would be a bit complex for users but would be a better solution for electronics. I found that quite a large portion of my usage at least is all DC. For a place with motors, its a different story of course.
Each type has its uses after all.

I haven't looked up DC LEDs properly. I have been in a place though that actually did have a 12VDC lighting system that worked quite well.

A point to consider is the large number of transformers required in each device. A DC system will still require that voltage levels be changed but unless you use a transformer for isolation, that mass of copper can be removed or I hope at least lessened to some extent. There are a lot of transformers in all our DC devices after all!
Well the question we need to ask is sticking to 240V a good strategy? There are countries currently on 110VAC and it doesn't seem to affect them much. With the way technology is moving towards efficiency I think we need to also look at something lower. DC-DC is somewhat more efficient but the main drawing card is that it can be run directly without the use of an inverter.

What I am interested in though is exactly what can be powered off DC already. What motors, heating and cooking devices for example. I know some PC power supplies are DC compatible but haven't done any research on which ones exactly. Found this article. Seems a number of manufacturers and consortiums want to push for DC invalidating the objections that there's no support.
 

ambo

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
2,685
Well the question we need to ask is sticking to 240V a good strategy? There are countries currently on 110VAC and it doesn't seem to affect them much.
The use of 110 VAC comes from a time when scientists thought that the danger in electric shocks was the voltage. A lower voltage was chosen as it was thought to be safer.

We have since realised that this is not the case and that current is in fact the killer but the US and others following that standard are somewhat stuck with it. It does cause them problems though with all their reticulation obviously carrying double the current for the same power throughput. This means thicker cables, heavier circuit breakers and various other issues.

There has been some discussion and experimentation with the use of 230 VAC within certain closed environments to get around these issues. I have for example read about some US data centres that run at 230 V using equipment designed for those voltages. The savings in power cabling and the ability to increase the compute densities made significant differences to their costs.
 

Wasabee!

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
5,318
Can't we use less voltage and more amps? like a 50W 60A DC geyser? Who can I pay to make a prototype? I think this is the next big thing.
 

russellw1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
205
A geyser element is a resistive load so that 230Vdc 12A or 16A will work but switches must be heavy duty because of arcing. DC current is good for welding.
 
Last edited:

russellw1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
205
Can't we use less voltage and more amps? like a 50W 60A DC geyser? Who can I pay to make a prototype? I think this is the next big thing.

Current has high losses in power cabling which is the reason that Eskom steps up voltages to reduce current in transmission lines.
 
Top