Since 2012 already.
Thing is that the scientists are right. While voltage isn't the main factor it is a factor.
I'm glad you're starting to see they are straw men. But they are your straw men so I won't respond to the junk you just raised here again. I see you also still like twisting what's said and taking things out of context to fit your agenda.
Yes great, the usual "up to" weasel words. Like insurance from R50/pm and up to R10m payout. Are the two linked?
Unfortunately you don't even know how to use current limiting resisters. Run to google again.
I'll explain the process to you even though I don't expect you to understand it. It's entirely possible to connect a high power LED to a resister alone and it does work. The result isn't what you expect though. Your first problem is that of power dissipation. In order to make it function correctly a voltage must be selected to account for any voltage drops the power source may have. The high current required for super and ultra bright LEDs together with this voltage makes it rather impractical as the resister has to be of a high power rating. More than that as the voltage varies it results in varying brightness.
A better method is a circuit based on something like the LM317. It's a variable voltage regulator which means the brightness can be controlled and extra power is dissipated by the regulator and not the resister. Great for dimming applications. Where that isn't required though it would be better use a standard regulator that limits the voltage to just above the Vf of the LED and select a lower power resister based on that.
If you want to go all out there's the MOSFET-transistor current limiting circuits but again more expensive than the resistor solutions.
Not you again with your straw men. Thought you put them to rest already.
Whatever dude. The problem is still that you fail to realise you CAN'T win an argument with a straw man. I bet you still haven't looked at the links I provided and what a straw man actually is. You will just forever stay hopeless at debate. A moderator would just hold his head in anguish if he were to come across someone like you.
Exactly what was said. Some devices work off AC and some off DC.
You just changed your mind as you tagged along. You never addressed the issues lodged about your fallacy claims like with the high current drawn at 12VDC over standard wiring. YOU claimed you can string a few LED's and 317 regulators together to replace the current lighting system in a home to replace the existing system and again I showed you it's not feasible on 12VDC. In short you made a massive fool of yourself thumsucking stupid ideas and when proven to you by many individual members it's not a workable solution then you just tagged along "modifying" you idea or just argued with a lot of thubsuck BS to make it seem a legit and viable solution. You still also never addressed the issue of the required logistics, modifications and sizes of the DC cable required and how you are going to wire a home legally without having to pull in a separate DC bus.
Lol, you're the one using fallacies which you still don't understand. This is perfect example why debate should be made a compulsory graded school subject.
Sign up with Google