The Gender Debate

Brenden_E

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
4,108
No, I read up on various religions when I went thru my satanism/wiccan/atheism/islam phase to fill the gaping void in my life which I eventually buried with porn and family
The unexpected twist at the end gave me a seriously good laugh.
 

Techne

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
11,140
No, I read up on various religions when I went thru my satanism/wiccan/atheism/islam phase to fill the gaping void in my life which I eventually buried with porn and family
Ok, that is enough internet for me for a few days:oops:
 

Emjay

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
7,437
https://quillette.com/2019/03/02/lies-damned-lies-and-stem-statistics/

Sexism as an Explanation for Low Numbers of Women in STEM
From what I can tell, the complaints about women in STEM, are, to a large extent, based on a flawed definition of the “S” and “T ” in STEM (too narrow), flawed arithmetic (ignorance of the see-saw principle), and ignorance about psychology (the well-known “people/things” asymmetry). These complaints seem to be fuelled by anecdotes and surveys of sexism in engineering and the “hard” sciences. However, there are anecdotes and surveys of sexism in the health sciences, the law, the arts (#MeToo) and the humanities (Searle’s girls) too.

It strikes me as bizarre to suggest sexism is holding women down dramatically in some buildings of the contemporary university and not holding them down at all in adjacent buildings where they achieve emphatic majorities in terms of completing PhDs. The same HR policies regarding sexism, discrimination, harassment and so on apply everywhere on campus and in broader society. Numerous academics of global renown have been defenestrated for sexist acts (harassing and having affairs with female graduate students in the case of the philosopher, John Searle) and utterances (saying females are more likely to cry than men and are a distraction in a lab in the case of Tim Hunt, a 2001 Nobel laureate).

So, from the above we can conclude that sexism is not a particularly convincing explanation for the relative lack of women in STEM narrowly defined at university. I don’t doubt sexism explains some cases of women bailing out of engineering. I don’t doubt sexism explains some cases of women bailing out of medicine and law either. Everybody will run into a bad boss or a toxic colleague at work sooner or later. However, far more plausible explanations for the relatively low numbers of women in STEM narrowly conceived are the female preference for working with people rather than things and the see-saw principle, the simple fact that, given overall parity, it is statistically impossible for women to be an emphatic majority in one broad field without being an emphatic minority in another.
1551681821960.png
 

Emjay

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
7,437

Emjay

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
7,437
This is amazing.

https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/

Attraction Inequality and the Dating Economy

1552424475469.png

There are no villains in this story. Nobody can or should be blamed for his or her honest preferences, and if women collectively believe that most men are unattractive, what grounds does anyone, male or female, have to argue with them? We may pity the large majority of men who are regarded as unattractive and who have few or no romantic experiences while a small percentage of attractive men have many. Just as much, consider that we live in a monogamous culture, and so the 20 percent of men who are regarded as attractive can only be in committed relationships with at most 20 percent of women. We may just as well pity the rest of the women, who are destined to be in committed relationships, if they pursue a relationship at all, with someone who they regard as unattractive. The only villain in this story is nature, which has molded our preferences so that this tragic mismatch of attraction and availability occurs.
 

rambo919

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
3,645
If all woman start thinking that gender is whatever people feel like being.... most men would be whatever gender they have to be.
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
47,752
If all woman start thinking that gender is whatever people feel like being.... most men would be whatever gender they have to be.
I heard there are some people that identify as trisexual now, to cover all the bases. Someone said that @Iamafreak might be able to give more info on that.
 

Emjay

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
7,437
Baby Dies Because Doctors Were Told His Pregnant Mother Was A Man

“The 32-year-old patient told the nurse he was transgender when he arrived at the emergency room and his electronic medical record listed him as male. He hadn’t had a period in several years and had been taking testosterone, a hormone that has masculinizing effects and can decrease ovulation and menstruation. But he quit taking the hormone and blood pressure medication after he lost insurance.”
Wonder how the activists are going to get around the fact that underlying biology cannot be changed? We will need a gender and sex classification.
 

gamer16

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
9,501
If all woman start thinking that gender is whatever people feel like being.... most men would be whatever gender they have to be.
Which would be a manly male, not only out of its necessity but because the world is so much more fun and interesting for men, I think.
 
Top