They didn't plead guilty so a case needed to build beyond any reasonable doudt. Symes & Bodi pleaded guilty so their cases were handled long ago.Gees 8 years later?
They didn't plead guilty so a case needed to build beyond any reasonable doudt. Symes & Bodi pleaded guilty so their cases were handled long ago.Gees 8 years later?
ja but we technically a IPL light by virtue of the team ownersWe have the fourth most valuable media rights in the world:
If I had to choose my best Test team, it would look something like this.
1.J. Hermann
2. A. Markram (vc)
3. R. Rickleton (WK)
4. T. Stubbs
5.T. Bavuma (c)
6. D. Bedingham
7. R. De Swart
8. G. Linde
9. M. Jansen
10. G. Coetzee / Dane Paterson
11.K Rabada
12. K. Maphaka
13. K. Verreynne
I feel Dane Paterson deserves his spot, for the Test Championship, I would play him. But at the ripe age of 35, after the championship, I would probably play Coetzee.
Maphaka is also bubleing under. Still very young and from what I see has an attitude problem. But as far as lefties go, I think he has a bright future. De Swardt is the batting all-rounder we desperately need. How the selectors keep overlooking him is beyond my understanding.
Linde's age is also not on his side, but he is a very decent spinner and capable with the bat, batting being our weakest link, a capable tail is needed and I believe with the above team we have that.
Hermann is currently the best domestic opener, I would trust him with the bat over De Zorzi any day of the week. Neither Rickleton, Stubbs, Bedingham, or Verreynne has been really impressed with the bat on the international stage. But they are the best we have. I also believe they are better than what we have seen. Unfortunately, there won't be space for all, so personally it would be a toss-up between Verreynne and Stubbs who sit out. Would probably go for Verreyne but can always rotate them going forward. We are in a fortunate position to sit with 4 Wickerkeepers in our squad...
What do you guys think?
Rickleton (and De Swart) over Verreynne?
Linde over Maharaj?
Nah. Good thing you're nowhere near the selectors.
Edit: also, your team has quota problems
Had one good series vs India and nothing else. Got dropped deservedly and not done anything domestically to force his way back since.What's happened to Keegan Peterson?
De Swadt is a considerably better batsman.There is no way dropping Kesh from the test team..De Swart isn't better then Mulder.
Yeah Kesh is a better bowler than Linde. But Linde is a much better batsman.Kesh has been great this year...35 wickets in 7 matches (1 more wicket than KG in one match less).
I'd back us against India at Lord's, but it's looking more and more likely to be Aus.I think we are a bit flattered by our nr1 spot tbh.
Either oz or india will be too strong for us over a series.
But a one off? Lets see
Yeah Kesh is a better bowler than Linde. But Linde is a much better batsman.
The only reason I would pick Linde (same with Swadt) is because I have zero confidence in our batting lineup. We need guys that can bat way down to try and strengthen out very weak batting lineup.
Simply incorrect.De Swadt is a considerably better batsman.
Mulder is a slightly better bowler.
If I physically watch them play, to me Ruan De Swart looks like the better batsman, But I guess time will tell.Simply incorrect.
You are using Ruan De swardt overall FC record to make your judgement forgetting for alot of his career we had 2 first class levels. The franchise and semi pro level.
All Ruan De swardt's 100's have come in the semi amateur level.
Wiaan Mulder has 100's at test level, top first class level in SA, county cricket and SA A level.
Mulder 12 hundred's in total(3 at semi amateur level) vs DE swardt 3 100's all at amateur level.