You are emotionally compromised in your post as you ramble without giving facts and making false inferences.
First, thank you for using more sensible grammar that's easily readable for all. Secondly I did say your explanations is soup. Thirdly that it seems you are calling Afrikaners stupid. You confirmed the latter.
However, once again you zoom in on the one aspect of what I was saying, proving what I said further. Yet you ignore everything else happening around a most serious issue. You chose Toekomsvonk to make a point. I'm not sure how many Afrikaners even know them, much less associate with them. Yet you're using that to justify saying "
A cherry on its own isn't much of a prize but Afrikaners have never been known for their intelligence."?
Using your logic I could say any members of Andile's ethnic group/Blacks are just like him, likewise any marginal contentious figure. I'm sure - in fact know - most Black people would not wish to be associated with Andile.
In the final analysis, you ignore that numerous other groups also chose to launch complaints. However you chose to zoom in on "dumb Afrikaners". It seems you have an issue with Afrikaners?
No, I'm not emotionally compromised. I read stuff and take it "with a knippie sout", from where it comes. Before you go down the "you are an insulted Afrikaner route", my home language is English, family origins are German, Welsh plus a lot of what can only be described at best as South African, the people I care about.