The State goes after the Guptas, sets sights on assets worth about R1.6bn

f2wohf

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
15,157

f2wohf

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
15,157
McKinsey now comes back saying they didn't forget to pay back the 1.6bn but hasn't received the "order" to. :crylaugh:

No joy from Eskom

McKinsey said it has written to the power utility five times since October, requesting that it set up court proceedings to have the monies paid.

“They have taken no action. We want this money to be transferred quickly so it can be used for the benefit of the South African people," it said.

“We have been taking legal advice and will find another way to give this money to the people of South Africa in case Eskom decides not to pursue the matter in an appropriate legal forum.”

Eskom is yet to respond to Fin24’s queries on the matter.

In October 2017 McKinsey had said it would only pay back the money on a court order.

But in November 2017, when testifying before the Eskom inquiry in Parliament, McKinsey senior partner David Fine said the consultancy had resolved to pay back the R1bn, even if a court found it to be legal.

McKinsey is still taking this stance in its statement.

“We are returning this money not because we have done anything wrong, but because Eskom has told us they did not follow the appropriate process," its spokesperson said on Tuesday.

https://www.fin24.com/Companies/Fin...pay-back-eskoms-money-for-two-months-20180116
 

rza

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
9,810
McKinsey now comes back saying they didn't forget to pay back the 1.6bn but hasn't received the "order" to. :crylaugh:

https://www.fin24.com/Companies/Fin...pay-back-eskoms-money-for-two-months-20180116

These people are an embarassment. Why would you pay back money when you received it legally? And why if you think you didn't receive it legally would you wait for Eskom to get a court order first? Why would you say you are waiting for a court order first but then say you will pay even if the court says you received the money legally?
 

Temujin

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2015
Messages
18,379
These people are an embarassment. Why would you pay back money when you received it legally? And why if you think you didn't receive it legally would you wait for Eskom to get a court order first? Why would you say you are waiting for a court order first but then say you will pay even if the court says you received the money legally?

Going to see lots of rats running around in the coming days, no honor among thieves and all that, they're all going to be throwing each other under the bus to try show how clean and innocent they are
 

R13...

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
46,618
It'd be good to see arrest of Eskom board and executives too. It looks like despite the various revelations, Eskom continues to be as corrupt and captured as ever. Enabled by the minister in charge
 

f2wohf

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
15,157
Good!

At least 14 people and entities linked to the alleged corruption by Gupta-linked company Trillian and international consultancy firm McKinsey have been identified in a preservation order obtained by the Asset Forfeiture Unit.

The December 14 order, obtained in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, seeks to recoup assets worth an estimated R1.6 billion as the State finally goes after those identified in probes into state capture, by the family linked to President Jacob Zuma.

The AFU is going after the big shots at Trillian and McKinsey. The people named in the court order include Eric Wood who is Trillian CEO, Trillain CFO Tebogo Leballo and Prakash Parbhoo, a partner at McKinsey and Jean Pierre Goerges Desvaux, who is a senior partner and managing partner at McKinsey.

The court order also identifies Trillian property in the high-end business precinct Melrose Arch in Johannesburg.

A Durban-based curator, Medwin Madoda Sifiso Nxumalo, has been appointed.

Nxumalo will have powers, duties and authority to "assume control of the property and do any and all things necessary to preserve the property while the order is in force", the order states.

The AFU went to court for an order against the global company as well as the Gupta-linked Trillian Capital Partners for allegedly scoring an invalid contract from Eskom.

Others named in the order include: Veronica Magwentshu, Thabiso Legoete, Johannes Faure, Daniel Roy, Trillian Capital Partners, Trillian Finanical Advisory, Trillian Management Consulting, Trillian Properties, Trillian Securities, McKinsey and Company Africa, and "any other person who becomes known to the applicant as having an interest in the property.

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/N...ividuals-to-have-their-assets-frozen-20180116
 

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
47,681
Dear lord - if 50 billion pops into the fiscus there will be new Mercs and Nkandlas like there's no tomorrow.
 

Milano

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
16,752
Will they announce that Atul has brain, testicular and penile cancer before or after the trial?
 

creeper

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
5,463
Dear lord - if 50 billion pops into the fiscus there will be new Mercs and Nkandlas like there's no tomorrow.

The same amount SARS under collected. Seems the AFU is a new branch

/ends conspiracy thinking
 

Gordon_R

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
20,833
amaBhungane and Scorpio have published a very lengthy article on money laundering and the #GuptaLeaks. I struggled to even skim the details, and wondered about the relevance: https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/guptaleaks-meet-the-money-launderers-20180118

It turns out the asset forfeiture process is complicated by the sheer number of companies and individuals involved. Tracking numerous transactions, and proving that each is illegitimate, is incredibly time consuming.

P.S. I consider creating a new thread topic, but in isolation the report is hard to place on context.
 
Top