'There is no black person who can be racist'

[access]

Note the complete absence of any comments from the "intellectually gifted" crowd.

intellectually humble, you mean

 

[Ponderer]

intellectually humble, you mean

Mmmm - forgot to use the sarcasm font.
Will fix it.

 

[ForceFate]

Note the complete absence of any comments from the "intellectually gifted" crowd.

You can't seem to resist the urge to put your foot in your mouth each time you open mybb forums.

 

[azbob]

Note the complete absence of any comments from the "intellectually gifted" crowd.

 

[STS]

Note the complete absence of any comments from the "intellectually gifted" crowd.

We'll add you to a whatsapp group so that you can message everyone when you challenge them online, since they are expected to be here every second of the day

 

[IT_Steven]

Nothing to see here

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1296802503951110145

 

[Jet-Fighter7700]

so by this comment, no Muslim can be racist towards another Muslim, no Jew ect

just so many faults saying no Black can be racist.

 

[Tokolotshe]

You can't seem to resist the urge to put your foot in your mouth each time you open mybb forums.

Actually what I found interesting in what BDL said, is who were those most offended.

 

[CaptainOblivious]

Actually what I found interesting in what BDL said, is who were those most offended.

"Trendy lefty". I learned something today.

 

[Tokolotshe]

"Trendy lefty". I learned something today.

Listen further

 

[CaptainOblivious]

Listen further

Eh? I listened to the whole thing. I was just remarking that BDL gave me a new phrase to add to my lexicon. Never heard him speak before, but he seems quite articulate.

 

[Tokolotshe]

Eh? I listened to the whole thing. I was just remarking that BDL gave me a new phrase to add to my lexicon. Never heard him speak before, but he seems quite articulate.

The funny part is he points out exactly the same usual suspects we do, as being the most butt hurt.

 

[CaptainOblivious]

The funny part is he points out exactly the same usual suspects we do, as being the most butt hurt.

Right, and they imagine themselves to be so trendy, don't they?

 

[Tokolotshe]

Right, and they imagine themselves to be so trendy, don't they?

Well, let me answer it like this: Guess who's who ...

Hint: Just think of our resident memebot

 

[CaptainOblivious]

Well, let me answer it like this: Guess who's who ...
View attachment 898130
Hint: Just think of our resident memebot

When you stop to think about it, all it is is weaponised groupthink...

 

[Vrotappel]

Enjoy your song?

His mantra.

 

[vigras rojara]

When you stop to think about it, all it is is weaponised groupthink...

You stopped to think about "it" and your first thought was " this is weaponised group think"?

 

[CaptainOblivious]

You stopped to think about "it" and your first thought was " this is weaponised group think"?

No, I've been thinking about "it" for a long time. And now I have a convenient way of putting what I dislike about "it", one that really gets to the crux of my grievance.

 

[vigras rojara]

No, I've been thinking about "it" for a long time. And now I have a convenient way of putting what I dislike about "it", one that really gets to the crux of my grievance.

So you stopped for a long time to think about your grievance and all you could come up with was a cliche. Wild and wonderful Xarog.

 

[CaptainOblivious]

So you stopped for a long time to think about your grievance and all you could come up with was a cliche. Wild and wonderful Xarog.

Is it a cliche to suggest that the method of action that makes this particular groupthink weaponised is that it fundamentally treats different outcomes between individuals immoral, and that it attempts to portray itself as forward-moving in a trendy sort of way where the trend is against individuality as such?

Oh well, I guess I must just be behind the curve, but one does wonder why the characterisation itself bothers you, since if what I was concluding was obvious, then it would satisfy as a reasonable "first thought" and so your initial response no longer makes sense...

Would you care to clarify?