'There is no language that is superior to another' - Ramaphosa

spiff

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
5,828
"There is no language in this country that is superior to another,"

so what about skin colour?
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
23,178
It's funny how people get so religious about how "superior" english is considering it's basically a bastard germanic langue...... it's got so many different lingual ancestors it's basically colourd.
 

Milano

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
16,752
The remaining 24 indigenous languages of SA that receive no official recognition are all equal. Just go with it. The chosen primary language of government and parliament is English. They are all equal. Just go with it.
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
23,178
The remaining 24 indigenous languages of SA that receive no official recognition are all equal. Just go with it. The chosen primary language of government and parliament is English. They are all equal. Just go with it.
I do find it hillarious that the "anti-colonial" regime should choose a colonial language...... they are either nuts of just plain idiots.
 

Milano

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
16,752
I do find it hillarious that the "anti-colonial" regime should choose a colonial language...... they are either nuts of just plain idiots.

And remarkably the state's actual chosen language is not even a recognised language unless talking shìt is now a recognised language.
 

GreatWmR

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2016
Messages
1,982
Sounds like he messed up his animal farm reference
"All languages are equal, but some languages are LESS equal than others" - Lesufi Cyril Ramaphosa
 

Nanfeishen

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,937
In a society where English is already dominating, there's little chance the indigenous languages will develop well enough to rival developed languages. To compound the issues, black middle class has largely adopted English as a dominant language in their daily lives.
Its a world wide phenomenon , indigenous languages are dying out all around, they run well into the hundreds.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization defines five levels of language endangerment between "safe" (not endangered) and "extinct"
  • Vulnerable – "most children speak the language, but it may be restricted to certain domains (e.g. home)"
  • Definitely endangered – "children no longer learn the language as mother tongue in the home"
  • Severely endangered – "language is spoken by grandparents and older generations; while the parent generation may understand it, they do not speak it to children or among themselves"
  • Critically endangered – "the youngest speakers are grandparents and older, and they speak the language partially and infrequently"
  • Extinct – "there are no speakers left; included in the Atlas if presumably extinct since the 1950s"
Some Examples from different locations :
 

Ninja'd

A Djinn
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
50,213
It's funny how people get so religious about how "superior" english is considering it's basically a bastard germanic langue...... it's got so many different lingual ancestors it's basically colourd.

Jou ma
 

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
41,188
It's funny how people get so religious about how "superior" english is considering it's basically a bastard germanic langue...... it's got so many different lingual ancestors it's basically colourd.
The results are almost flawless.
 

MrGray

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
9,397
While it's lovely to acknowledge all the languages, it's a waste of time and resources to focus on anything other than the most pragmatic.

English is the de facto "lingua franca" of the planet so as much as you can debate the relative merits of other languages this is the one essential language that anyone who wants to get anywhere in life needs to know. This isn't an opinion, it's just the objective reality.
 

Nanfeishen

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,937
If a small barely used language dies out..... is it really a loss?
Historically , yes , a huge loss.
We land up with undeciphered writing systems and scripts, that could very well contain knowledge that allows us to better understand our past.
If somebody hadnt taken the time to carve out the Rosetta stone , we would never understand the history of Egypt as well as we do, as the ability to read, write and speak the language was lost, and even with that stone there are huge gaps in the knowledge.
Language, especially recorded written language plays a far bigger role in understanding and deciphering the history of humanity than most people realise.
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
23,178
Historically , yes , a huge loss.
We land up with undeciphered writing systems and scripts, that could very well contain knowledge that allows us to better understand our past.
If somebody hadnt taken the time to carve out the Rosetta stone , we would never understand the history of Egypt as well as we do, as the ability to read, write and speak the language was lost, and even with that stone there are huge gaps in the knowledge.
Language, especially recorded written language plays a far bigger role in understanding and deciphering the history of humanity than most people realise.
Except there you are comparing large languages with fringe languages..... on a practical level there are just too many currently. Their very diversity becomes a problem when it comes to their usefulness especially with so many of them being verbally based languages which produces less intelligent people because only literary languages provide the tools for advanced thinking.

True there is always a loss but currently we are at a civilizational level where everything can be transcribed to superior languages which will mean almost no loss if the original language inevitably dies out.
 

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
41,188
Except there you are comparing large languages with fringe languages..... on a practical level there are just too many currently. Their very diversity becomes a problem when it comes to their usefulness especially with so many of them being verbally based languages which produces less intelligent people because only literary languages provide the tools for advanced thinking.

True there is always a loss but currently we are at a civilizational level where everything can be transcribed to superior languages which will mean almost no loss if the original language inevitably dies out.
Only if they have official status.
 

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
41,188
What? English has a lot of legacy problems in it, when compared to other major language groups.
So does most "creole" languages. You'll notice I highlighted "almost" in that post.
 
Top