Why should a citizenship application be sped especially for him just because he's a great rugby player?
I hope none of you proposing that the law be bent for the Beast are going to complain when the Shabir Shaik is pardoned?
I hope none of you proposing that the law be bent for the Beast are going to complain when the Shabir Shaik is pardoned?
I hope none of you proposing that the law be bent for the Beast are going to complain when the Shabir Shaik is pardoned?
Did the Beast try to blackmail Zuma, and influence the decisions of the most powerful man in the country.
Or did Shabir get ignored by Snorre?
I think that the point is the law is the law, and should apply equally to everybody.I there is a big difference between a convicted fraudster and a person playing rugby me thinks
I think that the point is the law is the law, and should apply equally to everybody.
There was somebody who used to work with us - been in the country since primary school so he grew up here, studied here, completed his tertiary studies here, is working here and sees SA as his home. But he still has to follow the same path - still waiting for his 5 years to pass before he can get permanent residence, and then has to wait a further 5 years to get citizenship.
Oh and he does qualify for the "exceptional skills" thing too, seeing that he has a masters in engineering.
Ambassador or not, if the law is bent for him then it should be bent for everybody. It's not fair to other people who also genuinely work their @$$ off to be treated any differently.
Is that your best defense, and are you honestly advocating special treatment on the basis that his name is chanted? I couldn't give a rats a-ss if the whole world chanted his name (let alone a stadium full of beer guzzling gorillas) - our constitution makes it quite clear that no one person is more important than another.Do these "ppl" you refer to make a stadium shout their names?