Tito Mboweni refuses to scrap e-tolls: 'You pay for bread, and you'll pay for roads'

Sarg3_ZN

Expert Member
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
3,004
Is Tito suggesting an e-Toll/transport surcharge is going to be added to the price of bread?
 

ArtyLoop

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,777
Dumb voters would have voted for them even if they threatened imprisonment before the elections. As long as the poor dumb votas uses public transport, they do not pay a single cent and this would not affect them. They are not worried about the middle class votas who vote for them and have to pay, they are far and few between, as can be seen by an almost 80-90% unemployment figure in SA.

Your figure is a bit off the mark there. Also many of the people you refer to, actually have cars. Granted the cars are often "hoenderhokke" they are still on the roads.
Stop Tito, what's that sound.
Its me not giving one **** about your bullshit now
 

The_Librarian

Another MyBB
Super Moderator
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
37,738
Your figure is a bit off the mark there. Also many of the people you refer to, actually have cars. Granted the cars are often "hoenderhokke" they are still on the roads.
Interestingly, I had a look at people driving their cars after a near miss with a Mercedes (Merc was at fault).

Seems a lot of whites and blacks are driving older cars, but most hoity-toity blacks are driving grand, new cars. Very few hoity-toity whites driving grand new cars though.
 

ArtyLoop

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,777
Everyday I look forward to some burned gantries..... I go home disappointed. They can burn school and libraries but not this shît.
I think its quite difficult to burn an e-toll gantry
 

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
41,188
Interestingly, I had a look at people driving their cars after a near miss with a Mercedes (Merc was at fault).

Seems a lot of whites and blacks are driving older cars, but most hoity-toity blacks are driving grand, new cars. Very few hoity-toity whites driving grand new cars though.
Wouldn't that depend on location?
 

The_Librarian

Another MyBB
Super Moderator
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
37,738
Wouldn't that depend on location?
I will have to assume that. But it should be interesting to stand for a whole day at a busy intersection and tally the vehicles up, and do the same at other busy intersections and other suburbs/cities*

*only where it is safe to do so.
 

Looney

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Messages
5,348
I went to school with Tito Mboweni’s son. In fact we were good mates back in school. I proper feel like sending him a msg on facebook and telling him to give his dad a msg from South Africa, “Fsck you!cnut!”
 

The_Librarian

Another MyBB
Super Moderator
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
37,738
A nice, condensed summary of why OUTA (and most of us) is kicking back against this etoll malarkey :

Why OUTA says no to e-tolls

OUTA remains resolute on its call to have the scheme scrapped, not because we want to see SANRAL fail and not because we don’t want to pay for our infrastructure, but due largely to the following factors:

  • The irrational decision in the presence of more effective funding methods available to Government;

  • The administrative challenges which make it largely unworkable;

  • The legality of the decision (to be tested in court if SANRAL continues with its summonses and protracted litigation);

  • Its high contracted administration and operation costs at R9.9bn for five years;

  • The six years of empirical evidence of public refusal to pay, the scheme’s ultimate failure.
This scheme is so administratively flawed, that even the taxi industry who are exempted from the payment of e-tolls, fail to apply the administration conditions to receive their exemption.

In addition, the GFIP construction is steeped in collusion and corruption as was evidenced in the Competition Commission’s findings. OUTA’s research shows that this 186km freeway upgrade should not have cost us more than R10bn. SANRAL paid R17.9bn. Furthermore, according to SANRAL, the e-toll collection tender was won by ETC-JV at R6.2bn in 2009, whereas the contract was signed in 2011 at R9.9bn, with no reasonable explanation to the public for this grossly excessive change. OUTA has requested on several occasions that an independent inquiry takes place to uncover the odious debts that society has been lumbered with in both the road construction and the e-toll contract. Government remains silent on these calls.

Government did not make the e-toll decision with the best interests of society at the core of its reasoning, especially when more efficient and lower-cost alternatives were available to it. More importantly, when there is obvious corruption that inflates the costs to the public, Government ought to demonstrate that it has meaningfully sought redress rather than simply passing these costs on to the users who are expected to pay.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,354
Its high contracted administration and operation costs at R9.9bn for five years

So the administrative contracts are at a end now? Because that's the only reason we can't cancel etolls is contractual obligations to some Austrian company?
 

ArtyLoop

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,777
So the administrative contracts are at a end now? Because that's the only reason we can't cancel etolls is contractual obligations to some Austrian company?
Apparently. Makes one wonder if they actually cared for what rights they were signing away in those contracts.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
51,189
Now imagine if the fuel levy was actually ring-fenced and used on the roads, it would've probably paid off that 9 billion in less than a year as well with change but of course noooo the government doesn't want to give any of it's gravey train up.
 
Top