No I suggest you read it again carefully this time. It claims that the "climate's changed before" is a myth but admits right next to it the climate does react to whatever can change it.
You mean like the one above? Funny how the earth starts warming up leading to CO2 emissions but the earth warming up is then attributed to CO2 emissions. :crylaugh: Then you also don't have any actual data as you weren't there to record the temperatures. The most you can infer is that it got warmer. The only data we have before 1978 is conveniently being left out.
So where is all this "data"? Oh yeah, it doesn't exist! All of it is based on theoretical models by people in front of a computer. In science they are the equivalent of pencil pushers. The real scientists collecting the real data are saying with consensus they aren't finding any of what climate alarmists have predicted.
I am who I am.
Or there are many reasons for climate change and having been unable to prove global warming they are simply turning to the one that's easy to see and blaming the latter.
Except I'm not a climate change denier. I'm merely someone who has grown suspicious regarding the way climate change science has been hijacked for political purposes.
What territory is that, exactly?
Sign up with Google
