Hi,
It is possible to shape traffic by port - as Telkom has demonstrated very well.
It also possible to shape traffic by user.
If Telkom is worried about the effect of "abusive users" on other users as they claim, why not shape the bandwidth priorities according to users?
If you are a heavy user, you get a very low priority, if you are a light user, you get a high priority. But as long as there is bandwidth available, no packets will be delayed - only at peak times.
Then they don't need to do shaping by port, and the gamers can play as much as they like as long as they are not moved to a low priority group due to playing too hard!
Seems to me a very fair way of doing: If you use little, we give you the fastest possible speed. If you are an abuser- please queue for some spare bandwidth[
]
Problem is, with Telkom's "best effort" attitude, one can't trust them to provide a fair service. Hope ICASA will get them to prove that the do so.
South Africa needs World Class Broadband at World Competitive Prices.
It is possible to shape traffic by port - as Telkom has demonstrated very well.
It also possible to shape traffic by user.
If Telkom is worried about the effect of "abusive users" on other users as they claim, why not shape the bandwidth priorities according to users?
If you are a heavy user, you get a very low priority, if you are a light user, you get a high priority. But as long as there is bandwidth available, no packets will be delayed - only at peak times.
Then they don't need to do shaping by port, and the gamers can play as much as they like as long as they are not moved to a low priority group due to playing too hard!
Seems to me a very fair way of doing: If you use little, we give you the fastest possible speed. If you are an abuser- please queue for some spare bandwidth[
Problem is, with Telkom's "best effort" attitude, one can't trust them to provide a fair service. Hope ICASA will get them to prove that the do so.
South Africa needs World Class Broadband at World Competitive Prices.