TransUnion hackers "invite" banks, other companies to pay "insurance" fee

Jan

Who's the Boss?
Staff member
Joined
May 24, 2010
Messages
13,981
Reaction score
11,965
Location
The Rabbit Hole
Basically, almost everyone in SA is in the possible leak, even TU can't be trusted, and they have some seriously private and sensitive data, WTF?
 
Is it my imagination, or does it all seem to be vehicle finance and insurance related?

So I bought my car cash. At worse I will be clipped for insurance but they dont have my bank there either.

The problem with these large central databases are that they are prone to attack.

The largest leak was an estate agency pulling in house ownership information including people's financial info, loans outstanding and all PPI information.

Pay the ransom, the fine is about R100 million for a leak per bank or so.
 
Is it my imagination, or does it all seem to be vehicle finance and insurance related?

So I bought my car cash. At worse I will be clipped for insurance but they dont have my bank there either.

The problem with these large central databases are that they are prone to attack.

The largest leak was an estate agency pulling in house ownership information including people's financial info, loans outstanding and all PPI information.

Pay the ransom, the fine is about R100 million for a leak per bank or so.

Ummm yes they do have your bank, because they know which bank you pay from but regardless Trans Union have all of those details anyway so you are SOL, plus they have your ID number so can trawl the data from Home Affairs and build whatever profile they need.

And how does paying the ransom protect the banks at all? The ransom only applies to TU.
 
This is always going to be a problem when the fact that your data can be sold for profit trumps the effort and spend to secure it.

Transunion is only a custodian of this data to re-sell it somehow for money. Exploit that and you find your way in ala Experian style...
 
This is a bit unfair MyBB

1647604020092.png

Why include Nedbank and Capitec if they're not on the list?
*EDIT* I see they are on the list, just not mentioned in the headline?

As for data from 54 million South African customers stolen, that's our entire population.
 
This is a bit unfair MyBB

View attachment 1272884

Why include Nedbank and Capitec if they're not on the list?
*EDIT* I see they are on the list, just not mentioned in the headline?

As for data from 54 million South African customers stolen, that's our entire population.
why was i thinking of this while looking at your picture,


1647604185692.png
 
This is always going to be a problem when the fact that your data can be sold for profit trumps the effort and spend to secure it.

Transunion is only a custodian of this data to re-sell it somehow for money. Exploit that and you find your way in ala Experian style...
This - hackers working in small groups who do not have a million costs related to regulatory compliance can more easily afford to spend time hacking you than you could ever hope to spend on securing it in the first place.
Its a completely asymmetrical fight.
 
Well now someone can impersonate you while calling the bank, they have all the answers to the kyc authentication questions.
 
In a statement on Thursday, the company acknowledged that a third party had gained access to one of its servers through misuse of an authorised client’s credentials.
If the password really was "password". It is not misuse of credentials, it is pure incompetence from TU. They should be fined just for using/allowing that password.
 
This is a bit unfair MyBB

View attachment 1272884

Why include Nedbank and Capitec if they're not on the list?
*EDIT* I see they are on the list, just not mentioned in the headline?

As for data from 54 million South African customers stolen, that's our entire population.
Why did you react like this for capitec and nedbank?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter