Trevor Noah slammed for suggesting Israel not defend itself: 'You're downplaying the trauma of millions'

krycor

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
18,546
I think Trevor had enough of the first world. Maybe time for America to cancel his visas and send him back to SA.

If you dumb enough to believe the headline then yes.

But the truth is he basically said.. to quote Spider-Man movie.. with great power comes great responsibility.

Of cause this is not allowed by Zionists as it means they not allowed to slaughter in retaliation. This isn’t the 1st time and won’t be the last as long as the US blindly supports them financially and via arms.


Want this end.. tie the US hands behind their back and the region will fix itself. Won’t be an Israel anymore.. might cause a nuclear war.. but it will be the end of the state one way or another and war will be gone until the Zionists force a war in the US, UK and EU as they did a century+ ago. Tells you who the aggressor really is.
 

krycor

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
18,546
Btw this isn’t the 1st time this as a stance has been suggest nor is the violence out of the norm either.

The right wing & settlers always choose the end of Ramadan to cause kak. You literally can can search incidences and you will see it’s always at the end of the Ramadan period and the one after a new US democratic president is elected is always the worst for that era.

Why?

The Israeli gov is seeing how far they can push it and get away with it. Don’t be mistaken nor naive to think Biden is gonna stop it either. Just his tone won’t be the same as Trump who openly told them to do as they please.

So yah.. is it so unexpected.. nope. Is it the Palestinians starting kak.. not really.. not more than norm I’d say.. what was more than norm was the surge in West Bank evictions as expected as they see how the US will react (Democrats aren’t in favor of it as it leaves Bantustans as the only option with no zero guilt free two state solution illusion).

So no.. we will likely see an incursion into the occupied territories and more land taken unless the US is forced diplomatically to abstain from protecting them from a UN verbal beating.(no actual one as veto.. number of times veto was used to protect the state is ridiculous).
 

Captain Beer

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2005
Messages
7,043
Btw this isn’t the 1st time this as a stance has been suggest nor is the violence out of the norm either.

The right wing & settlers always choose the end of Ramadan to cause kak. You literally can can search incidences and you will see it’s always at the end of the Ramadan period and the one after a new US democratic president is elected is always the worst for that era.

Why?

The Israeli gov is seeing how far they can push it and get away with it. Don’t be mistaken nor naive to think Biden is gonna stop it either. Just his tone won’t be the same as Trump who openly told them to do as they please.

So yah.. is it so unexpected.. nope. Is it the Palestinians starting kak.. not really.. not more than norm I’d say.. what was more than norm was the surge in West Bank evictions as expected as they see how the US will react (Democrats aren’t in favor of it as it leaves Bantustans as the only option with no zero guilt free two state solution illusion).

So no.. we will likely see an incursion into the occupied territories and more land taken unless the US is forced diplomatically to abstain from protecting them from a UN verbal beating.(no actual one as veto.. number of times veto was used to protect the state is ridiculous).

I know it's almost 3:00AM, but my ****, could we possibly get a copy of this tirade in English, please.
 

Tokolotshe

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
12,137
If you dumb enough to believe the headline then yes.

But the truth is he basically said.. to quote Spider-Man movie.. with great power comes great responsibility.

Of cause this is not allowed by Zionists as it means they not allowed to slaughter in retaliation. This isn’t the 1st time and won’t be the last as long as the US blindly supports them financially and via arms.


Want this end.. tie the US hands behind their back and the region will fix itself. Won’t be an Israel anymore.. might cause a nuclear war.. but it will be the end of the state one way or another and war will be gone until the Zionists force a war in the US, UK and EU as they did a century+ ago. Tells you who the aggressor really is.
Ah! And the brave warriors shielding themselves with kids using their own as human fodder, terrorizing all with toxic ideology, wins. Slow clap.

The situation is not as simple as a few innocent terrorists and a bad, bad Israel. You have obviously long since chosen sides.
 

Caliph

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
623
"Suggesting Israel not defend itself"

This post is not news but a red-herring...

He didn't say that. He's just misquoted intentionally by Fox Entertainment to get the low iq's fuming.

Even if we play with his analogy of older and younger brothers. The older brother is not gonna let the younger brother win and not defend himself.

How can people be so gullible.

PS I don't watch Trevor Noah, but he is almost always right.
What did you expect? Its Fox News
 

Polymathic

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
29,798
Funny how people shriek about EWC and support Israel which is state founded on what was essentially EWC.

Also funny how the ANC shriek about Israel's "stealing of land" when they plan to do the same.

Hypocrites as far as the eye can see.
 

Vrotappel

Bulls fan
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
25,978
"Suggesting Israel not defend itself"

This post is not news but a red-herring...

He didn't say that. He's just misquoted intentionally by Fox Entertainment to get the low iq's fuming.

Even if we play with his analogy of older and younger brothers. The older brother is not gonna let the younger brother win and not defend himself.

How can people be so gullible.

PS I don't watch Trevor Noah, but he is almost always right.
He blatantly lied in the one bit I saw.
 

Bonywasawarrioraway

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
1,836
None/zero/zilch?
To answer both you and c4cat

Here's how it works. The israelis use what is known as counterbattery radar to track the incoming rockets and from their trajectories determine the position from which they were fired.

The next step is to attack that position either by artillery or airstrike in order to eliminate the source of the incoming rockets. The purpose is to stop the rockets, not kill people by the truckload. This is regarded in military circles as a defensive measure

hamas knows this. Israel has followed this model for some time.
If hamas either fired their rockets from uninhabited areas or evacuated non combatants before firing there would not be "civilian casualties.

Instead there always are and they always seem to include children.

The only logical conclusions are : 1. The israelies can't shoot for shirt, or, 2. hamas deliberately fire from places that will result in "civilian" casualties when the counter battery fire arrives. This gives them ammunition to scream "victim" and gain international support for them and condemnation for israel.

There is much argument as to which of these two is actually happening.

The fact that israel has installed the hugely expensive "Iron Dome" anti missile/rocket defence system when they could have just bought more shells to fire at Gaza speaks volumes.

Short version, the children fired no rockets. A great many people think they are kept close to the firing positions as a kind of human shield. The israeli practice of counter battery fire is so well known that if hamas had any intention of protecting peacefull palestinians they would shoot from where there were none.

Or maybe the israelis just cant shoot straight.
 

C4Cat

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
14,307
Here's how it works. The israelis use what is known as counterbattery radar to track the incoming rockets and from their trajectories determine the position from which they were fired.

The next step is to attack that position either by artillery or airstrike in order to eliminate the source of the incoming rockets. The purpose is to stop the rockets, not kill people by the truckload. This is regarded in military circles as a defensive measure
Then why doesn't the greatest military in the world send soldiers to the site to identify and take out the militants responsible instead of bombing an entire area and killing innocent civilians?
 
Top