TheMightyQuinn
Not amused...
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2010
- Messages
- 31,961
There yo go...If they don’t want their homes destroyed then they must stop voting for Hamas or move to Australia like the rest.
There yo go...If they don’t want their homes destroyed then they must stop voting for Hamas or move to Australia like the rest.
How many rockets did the 10 children launch into Israel?
Let me guess, you supported the ANC killing civilians in bombings because "if they don’t want to be bombed then they must stop voting for the NP"... am I right?There yo go...
Because the source of the rockets is usually well within enemy lines. A ground incursion would result in many more dead and take so long that the rocket launchers would be long gone by the time your forces got there. I know you think your suggestion is less aggressive but it isn'tThen why doesn't the greatest military in the world send soldiers to the site to identify and take out the militants responsible instead of bombing an entire area and killing innocent civilians?
That's incorrect. Israel has stated they bombed the building because Hamas has offices there, not because it was the source of the rocketsAlso as explained in my post, they are not bombing an area but a precise location from which the rockets were fired. The question is what are the innocent civilians doing there?
Consider this. You are a peaceful Palestinian family living in an apartment block. Unbeknownst to you, Hamas has an office in the same building, a few floors down. You see no rockets and know nothing about what they are up to. Next thing you're told to take what you can and get out of your home. What do you take? Where do you go? Next thing your home, the homes of your neighbours are destroyed.Consider this. You are a peaceful palestinian. One day as you go about your business you notice hamas rocket launchers setting up to shoot rockets into israel. Since its been happening for decades you know damn well that the israelis will reply with artillery or air strike. What would you do? If you stay there to be killed you are the dumbest muthhafirker on earth. The only plausible explanation for the civilians is that they are being prevented from leaving by hamas so that there can be innocent victims to protest
Wtf you talking about. Firing a missile isn't a silent thing. Of course civilians in the building would hear if a missile was launched.Consider this. You are a peaceful Palestinian family living in an apartment block. Unbeknownst to you, Hamas has an office in the same building, a few floors down. You see no rockets and know nothing about what they are up to. Next thing you're told to take what you can and get out of your home. What do you take? Where do you go? Next thing your home, the homes of your neighbours are destroyed.
I'm talking about the fact that missiles were not launched from that building. As Israel said, they bombed it because Hamas had an office there, not because it was the source of the missiles. Try again, this time without your incorrect assumptions about what happenedWtf you talking about. Firing a missile isn't a silent thing. Of course civilians in the building would hear if a missile was launched.
Your point is completely null and void.
Try again.
To answer both you and c4cat
Here's how it works. The israelis use what is known as counterbattery radar to track the incoming rockets and from their trajectories determine the position from which they were fired.
The next step is to attack that position either by artillery or airstrike in order to eliminate the source of the incoming rockets. The purpose is to stop the rockets, not kill people by the truckload. This is regarded in military circles as a defensive measure
hamas knows this. Israel has followed this model for some time.
If hamas either fired their rockets from uninhabited areas or evacuated non combatants before firing there would not be "civilian casualties.
Instead there always are and they always seem to include children.
The only logical conclusions are : 1. The israelies can't shoot for shirt, or, 2. hamas deliberately fire from places that will result in "civilian" casualties when the counter battery fire arrives. This gives them ammunition to scream "victim" and gain international support for them and condemnation for israel.
There is much argument as to which of these two is actually happening.
The fact that israel has installed the hugely expensive "Iron Dome" anti missile/rocket defence system when they could have just bought more shells to fire at Gaza speaks volumes.
Short version, the children fired no rockets. A great many people think they are kept close to the firing positions as a kind of human shield. The israeli practice of counter battery fire is so well known that if hamas had any intention of protecting peacefull palestinians they would shoot from where there were none.
Or maybe the israelis just cant shoot straight.
Ya, I'm a born and bred Israeli. When I was a kid, and I remember this so clearly, I was playing with this chick, siren goes off, we ran to the underground bomb shelter. Ya, not a pleasant experience.All the keyboard warriors are out in force again. Any of you so called experts even been to the Middle East?
Not fekkin one?
Remember the silly twats who roared off to be human shields?
The first missile hit.
They all shat in their pants.
Ran home screaming for their mommies.
So to our heroes here I want to see your face when a batshit sand squirrel blasts a missile at you.
Then why doesn't the greatest military in the world send soldiers to the site to identify and take out the militants responsible instead of bombing an entire area and killing innocent civilians?
Actually the targeted high rise buildings were not the sites from which the rockets were fired, so that's just BS.
No, those are buildings known to house either hamas leadership or ammunition / explosives dumps. This is after significant escalation. Counter battery fire is pretty much always the first step. This is logical as one wants the rockets to stop.Actually the targeted high rise buildings were not the sites from which the rockets were fired, so that's just BS.
I'm talking about the fact that missiles were not launched from that building. As Israel said, they bombed it because Hamas had an office there, not because it was the source of the missiles. Try again, this time without your incorrect assumptions about what happened
Consider this. You are a peaceful Palestinian family living in an apartment block. Unbeknownst to you, Hamas has an office in the same building, a few floors down. You see no rockets and know nothing about what they are up to. Next thing you're told to take what you can and get out of your home. What do you take? Where do you go? Next thing your home, the homes of your neighbours are destroyed.
) that's usually how the grownups determine guilt..You need to pay attention. They don't bomb entire areas. They are precise and actually warn civilians of impending attacks.
Have you actually watched footage of Israel destroying a building? Ever wondered why the streets around it are quiet and Palestinians are standing around filming before the strike? Have you noticed the ambulances in the area?
Israel warns civilians before they destroy a building with what is known as ''roof knocking''. A non-lethal missile/projectile will first be fired at a targeted building to warn civilians that there is an incoming, lethal attack. They even go as far as to use cellphone messages to warn people in the area of an imminent attack. Of course the window is condensed as they want to catch the Hamas targets, so that does lead to the unfortunate civilian casualties who may not get out in time.
Considering Israel brings down entire buildings, the casualties are low.
This video is a good example of Palestinians being aware of a targeted building, calmly pre-filming it with ambulances running around. Notice how quiet the streets are immediately around the building?
Same building, different angle. Notice how precise the missiles are as well.