I don't see USian Christian Evangelicals proclaiming Kamala to be the one true messiah unlike trumpYou spelled Kamala wrong.
I don't see USian Christian Evangelicals proclaiming Kamala to be the one true messiah unlike trumpYou spelled Kamala wrong.
How do you consider Trump to be the more sane option when he is untrustworthy? He is not just a liar, but a blatant one at that.
Integrity, even the façade of it is important to assess someone's sanity no?
And if so, how can you trust him to represent you as a servant?
Just curious as to the logic.
What is the alternative to any MSM?Can’t believe 45% of a tech forum are victims of MSM programming
Me too confusedI haven't really been following US politics. Why's she the devil too?
because gods poster boy, Trump, says soI haven't really been following US politics. Why's she the devil too?
What is the alternative to any MSM?
I have issues with MSM, but more so with fringe news sources.Anyone invoking the “U gEtz ur nooZ fRuM MSM” trope is really saying “I cannot explain my own views or argue against yours so this conversation is over”
I have issues with MSM, but more so with fringe news sources.
What is a reliable news source then. In my opinion, read a few of them, preferably those that shows opposing bias, and find a middle ground.
Lol.
They don’t have an answer, only the accusation. Anyone that says you get your news from MSM or the other favourite of “you watch CNN”, is best ignored. They are extremely gullible and susceptible to all sorts of misinformation.
thats why polls like this are so interesting. it gives a view as to what the MyBB audience thinks.You should be getting your news from your YouTube / Twitter echo chamber, that's where the truth is!
/s
You cannot count on my vote to not be bullschit here.thats why polls like this are so interesting. it gives a view as to what the MyBB audience thinks.
Youtube definitely leans Trump / Right.
Reddit undoubtedly praises Kamala / Left.
News sources seem partial to their favourites. It makes it incredible hard to get an accurate view of what the real deal is.
why would that be?You cannot count on my vote to not be bullschit here.
the value of that?Couldn't there be a third category, like a pile of dog ****? I am sure it would receive more votes than those 2.
I take the polls as seriously as DailyInvestorwhy would that be?
If you are the person to use logic, would you say that you wont ever fall to misinformation? Has it ever crossed your mind that the main stream media could have a big influence in shaping your perception of reality. Now you can argue that you form your own conclusions, which is fair, especially if you use multiple news sources. But my point is even though if you use multiple sources, if their goal is to report the same narrative then you wouldn't be the wiser.They don’t have an answer, only the accusation. Anyone that says you get your news from MSM or the other favourite of “you watch CNN”, is best ignored. They are extremely gullible and susceptible to all sorts of misinformation.
There are liars, and then there are blatant liars, the types who will tell you that it's raining cats and dogs while you're both standing in the hot bright sun.Hahahaha slickrick doesn't know that all politicians lie, constantly.
Welcome to the real world chum.
They are ALL blatant liars.There are liars, and then there are blatant liars, the types who will tell you that it's raining cats and dogs while you're both standing in the hot bright sun.
Trump is one of Those guys.
Stop it, stop trying to justify that man's k@k praat stories.They are ALL blatant liars.