Rocket-Boy
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2007
- Messages
- 10,199
Lol so some guy is using this as a platform to promote a service few people have heard of.
I don't know about everyone else, but I have better things to do with my time than to watch a bunch of corrupt majority party politicians being corrupt.At least it seems parliament appears to understand the issue.
But then, none of you watch the SABC channels so you would not know what happened in the snap debate today, or what happened in the SCOPA thereafter?
Parliament has placed the blame where the current situation belongs, squarely in the laps of a pretty useless Board and management, not with the SABC personnel.
And then the opposition all pointed out where the rot belongs as well.
And then by association, with us citizens who see it fit to vote in the current government.
So your solution is to kak en betaal?And that is pushing the rebellion against authority too far. But then that is what the SJWs want not so?
In a completely unrelated program ex President Obama,talking about his new book, discussed this very issue.
When does civil disobedience in the guise of "reform" start to dismantle the basic principles of a democracy? And what will happen then?
Calling the fact that we have a law dealing with charging a miserable token amount as a licence fee to partly fund public broadcasting an unjust law is a huge stretch.
For me it has everything to do with corruption, and I don't agree with your rhetoric at all.The entire household licensing factor is an outdated mechanism to raise indirect taxes.
Drop the rhetoric BS . It has nothing to do with corruption and colonialism.
The problem there is that the SABC has not completed its Digital Migration, and I suspect that the ANC is deliberately delaying the migration until after the next general elections for the simple reason that all the old analogue tuner TVs will require a set top box to receive digital and they are nowhere near ready to roll those out to millions of potential voters, ergo the propaganda will remain analogue until after the next general elections.How about they just roll out their set top boxes and charge fees per month for access onto it. That way whoever watched it will pay.
I dont know why they will give set-top boxes for free to people who doesnt have the licenses. Let them pay monthly via debit order and then you wouldnt have this problem. Ie if you dont pay for DSTV they will just cut you off, same with Netflix. Why cant the SABC follow the same route?
Also only TVs where you actually receive a signal needs to pay. Ie if you purchase a free to air box with a satellite dish, or DSTV or similar. Or if you subscribe to SABC online.
Or are they worried that no one actually wants to view them so no one would pay. Then improve your offering to make it more attractive. Dont hide behind we have to product local content. Perhaps fire some directors and improve your offering first. Then people will subscribe and pay for it.
I did that a few years back when I got FTTH: monitors with builtin speakers (as well as a sound bar) and streaming boxes.I dont bother watching E-TV either. Honestly its a terrible offering too.
I will definately buy video monitors next and chuck out my tv and license with it.
They are already compulsory, you infected tonsil... it's just that nobody wants to fund corruption any more...
I wouldn't really have an issue with compulsory TV licenses if it wasn't for all the corruption, mismanagement and poor quality of the programming.
I believe my payment would simply be squandered or stolen.
Even if my payment actually ended up efficiently going towards producing local programming, it would be unlikely to be anything I'd want to watch.
My name it Reek. It rhymes with sneak.He noted that eMedia is the only private free-to-air broadcaster in South Africa and said they wish and hope for a very strong SABC.
“Licence fees are compulsory in many parts of Europe, and we must try to make that compulsory here,” Sherrif said.
He noted that around 15 million households in South Africa, 3 million of which were indigent. This leaves around 12 million households, of which 10 million would pay TV licences if made compulsory, he said.
“You must make it compulsory – that is the important thing,” Sherrif said. “I think the government should make it its duty to find a way to get South Africans to commit to paying a TV licence.”
+ infinity!Foff
to be honest, the only possible change is to change the government, nothing else.
What a genius! But...I thought it was already compulsory to have a licence if you own a TV???Not that many millions bother though.![]()
I am guessing that you had a bicycle license back in the day as well?
I did - and a dog licence and a radio licence.
Radio licence was I think a few rand a year and Squad Cars was worth every cent ( or penny ).
Yes there is that angle too. At the moment, OVHD is on the top of the pile of mediocre crap called FTA entertainment, supported by unbelievable high levels of advertising to content time ratios.Funny that, an advertising driven free-to-air business that doesn't want the SABC to change to being only advertiser funded....
One wonders if there's possibly any self-interest in wanting to retain TV Licences?
D
As things go, doesn't that mean that the SABC as a business is a non-starter? If you rock up at an investor looking for funding for your new shiny idea, and tell them that your business can 100% never actually make any money they're going to laugh you out the door.Sherrif also said noted that even if the SABC were to receive all the television advertising budget available in South Africa (around R6 billion), it would still not be able to break even and deliver on their mandate.
But follow the correct procedure to cancel your licence otherwise it will continue to haunt you.I dont bother watching E-TV either. Honestly its a terrible offering too.
I will definately buy video monitors next and chuck out my tv and license with it.
JY kan hom dwars in jou gat op druk man, ek gebruik geen van daai vieslike honde se dienste