The car came with them on. The new tyres I had fitted is not Michelin. The fact is I am now short a expensive tyre which was not their property to do with as they please without verbally inform me. Or so is my feelings about the matter.![]()
So why didn't you check if there's a tyre in the boot before leaving the shop?
Most of this sounds like your fault to me if you genuinely wanted the tyre.
It's Ockie's money, he can spend it on whichever brand tyre he chooses. I had Michelin Energy on my Citi Golf - much better than the EcoContact that it replaced.Well chances are 99% it's not a Ferrari or a Brabus Rocket. If you've got any normal car like us mortals, you're wasting money on those overpriced tyres.
^ ThisSo it's perfectly acceptable to fit Michelin tyres to a 1.4 polo. You would probably score as they would last 80 0000km.
Standard practice. I ALWAYS ask for my undamaged tyres even if almost fully worn. Just in case of emergency. Bakkie tyres are kark expensive. So when I replace my tyres again the older stock in the garage is thrown out and the new old stock replaces it![]()
It did not occur to me to do that. Why did the sales person not ask me what I would like to do with the old undamaged tyre? Yes, I should have checked, but it honestly just did not occur to me. Them dealing with this every bloody damn day it seems like just the right thing to ask the customer what they would like to do. It is their property after all, unless they offer some form of communicated discount for them to keep the tyre.
And the story he gave me about a law that forbids them from asking the customer verbally if he wants his tyre back? Surely that is complete and utter BS?
Yeah, in a way your fault for not enquiring first, but you would think that they would communicate with you about it. Lot of tyre shops are sketchy.
Slightly off topic, but why didn't you only replace the damaged tyre? I know some people say all your tyres have to be the same brand and condition but that's bollocks.
And the story he gave me about a law that forbids them from asking the customer verbally if he wants his tyre back? Surely that is complete and utter BS?
Just grabbing some straws. When did you say they could keep the tyre? Did you sign anything that would make them the new owner of the tyres? If you didn't verbally agree or sign anything that states they can keep the tyre then this could be regarded as theft.
Slightly off topic, but why didn't you only replace the damaged tyre? I know some people say all your tyres have to be the same brand and condition but that's bollocks.
Yeah. Tell that to the acquaintance who had her X6 go into "limp" mode when it detected the circumference of the left rear tyre is not the same as the right rear tyre.
Only 5000km difference between them, but she had to replace both.