Quick to judge a bit - Think this is my first post on this topic... so not sure how you can decide I've been fooled by far too many of anything?
You said a lot in your single post. You need to be mindful that I have spent years researching this topic, have had these discussions in many echo chambers, as well as investing much time into correcting false narratives with my own relatives. I can tell very quickly when someone has been programmed by the dishonest left-wing media, and I know from first hand experience how much time and work is needed to undo the damage.
This may be hard to hear, and much harder to acknowledge the possibility that it may be true, but I'll elaborate a little on my thought process. I'm not going to try to convince you of anything, or debate about it.
"refusing to cover specific topics that would hurt Biden." is editorial privaledge.
Omission is just one of many ways the dishonest media manipulates those who are fooled by it. Your attempt to justify them doing that, alone tells me a lot.
It's different from just making stuff up like the National Enquirer or something.
This tells me that you've been gas-lit into believing that all alternative media sources make everything up. Years of research has shown me that mainstream media actually fabricates far more completely false stories than many alternative sources, and it's not even close. That's before considering the many other ways they mislead and manipulate narratives for the left-wing agenda.
There are degrees of badness - else you're just saying x did a bad thing, so everything they do/ever have done is terrible and bad - I think that's actually the definition of strawman?
Here you are attempting to try to rationalize the degree of badness that you perceive from the media you trust. There is a lot wrong here, but you may never have enough information to understand the situation.
Sniffing a kids head is not the same kind of abuse as grabbing a p*ssy... etc.
This shows me that you have been gas-lit with very biased narratives, which has caused you to develop a considerable level of TDS. You're not aware of most of the terrible things Biden has done, and you also think the things that Trump has done are much worse than they could ever be. Neither of these views are close to being accurate, and you may never know the extent that you have been mislead.
Addressing the examples you provided:
While I don't think the sniffing is appropriate, it's not something I would even consider when it comes to Biden being suitable for POTUS.
As for your out-of-context Trump quote, that was leaked private locker room talk, something that most men engage in to some degree. It happened in 2005, long before he ran for president, and is neither as bad as you think it is, nor would I even take it into consideration when assessing his suitability or competency as POTUS.
Sign up with Google
