InfrastructureBilPage2700
Expert Member
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2019
- Messages
- 1,320
So you're just lying and trolling, as expected. I probably should have ignored you, along with the rest of the TDS trolls, a long time ago.
So you're just lying and trolling, as expected. I probably should have ignored you, along with the rest of the TDS trolls, a long time ago.
You definitely should. My single goal in life is to impinge on your right to Freedom of Association, just as you suspected.So you're just lying and trolling, as expected. I probably should have ignored you, along with the rest of the TDS trolls, a long time ago.
No.Dont you people sleep?
This comment did not age well.It's quite refreshing to have an Adult in charge
This is fake news. People know what they are getting with Biden.
Your TDS is showing, you really need to let him go, he has moved on and so should you, you'll be happier for it...The media bias is so damn obvious and a complete joke. The media would never have laughed at that if it were Trump... They would have instead spun a bunch of hit pieces about it. TDS at it's finest.
Lol. Even the questions from the journalists are better already.
There is no answer.Wait, so she didn't know the answer and said I'll check and get back to you.
Sounds like the correct thing to do.
If I understand it correctly, he is behaving in the constraints of forum rules. Spreading lies & hypocrisy are not violation of forum rules. It is only when one tags a user repeatedly, it becomes trolling.David Freeman should really be banned, his behaviour is exceedingly obnoxious and trollish.
Allow me...Then go ahead and provide an example of a claim I have made, which you can prove is a lie with indisputable evidence.
To be clear: It must be a claim I made myself, not an article I linked. There must be indisputable evidence proving it without any question, so it can't be a general statement but a clear single fact which can easily be verified without any doubt.
Your claim:Adrian de los Rios you say?
Then who is the Doug Jensen feds in custody, Dave?
![]()
READ: Indictment and Statement of Facts against accused U.S. Capitol rioter Doug Jensen
Jensen has been indicted on six charges related to the Jan. 6 insurrection.www.desmoinesregister.com
![]()
Doug Jensen, man seen chasing Capitol Hill cop, charged with federal crimes
An Iowa man, accused of chasing after a Capitol police officer during the deadly pro-Trump riots last week, has been charged with federal crimes, according to court documents. Doug Jensen of Des Mo…nypost.com
But please don't let a 30 second google stop you posting BS memes purporting to be fact, Dave.
Oh look, yet another violent ring-wing extremist who got media attention storming the Capitol.
I can't link to the memories stored in my own brain. I've seen CNN footage many times over the past year, including live feeds, scanning through full days of archived footage, and many clips. That death toll counter was a fixture up until Trump left the White House.
Im amazed at how much space I occupy in your mind. Thanks for the mention.Is this how your world view works? OK, let's follow the logical conclusion but from your point of view.
Why are the Breonna Taylor cops not in jail for her "murder".
Before you say "but muh grand jury". None of the cops were charged with homicide. As far as the case went, Breonna Taylor's death didn't exist.
Just because the authorities don't do something about it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It has no bearing on PVeritas' journalism.
It's like @ghoti who thinks Antifa doesn't exist unless the FBI designate them as a group that exists. We know they exist. We can see they exist.
Also. Perfect timing. This is the quality of NYT journalists who said PVeritas' story was fake.
You state you despise dishonesty, yet you post articles which are outright lies, with headings worded to sensationalise, and probably in the hope that many target readers will simply clutch their pearls and scream "look, we told you so".
Now, if you actually read the Biden order, and then go on to the military handbook and read the relevant portion, you will soon realise this story is utter schit
The false Lancet article you posted, I put down to simple error.
I've seen two others, admittedly I don't recall which they were, but now a 4th one.
It would appear the "simple mistake" is part of a pattern forming.
There are only two conclusions I can come to:
Either you are embodying the dishonesty you claim to detest,
Or, you are simply posting deceitful articles in order to underpin your narrative - truth be damned.
Either way, you are actively poisoning the well from which you drink.
Mikey likes Pineapple on his Pizza. Confirmed!