U.S. Said to Consider a Breakup of Google to Address Search Monopoly

Eniigma

Eniigma

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
3,141
Reaction score
5,667
Location
Durban
One can hope and dream.

Also not sure if I posted it correctly, been a while.
 
TBH, I would generally not be against such a move.. but I don't know how you break Google up in a fashion that lessens its dominance on the search market whilst still maintaining it as a profitable and viable business.
 
ToxicBunny said:
TBH, I would generally not be against such a move.. but I don't know how you break Google up in a fashion that lessens its dominance on the search market whilst still maintaining it as a profitable and viable business.
Click to expand...
I think they should force Google developers to introduce millions of bugs so as to make it worse than Bing. I always get surprised when I find exactly what I am looking for when I do google search and this sort of skullduggery & magicfkkery should not be allowed to be developed.
 
surface said:
I think they should force Google developers to introduce millions of bugs so as to make it worse than Bing. I always get surprised when I find exactly what I am looking for when I do google search and this sort of skullduggery & magicfkkery should not be allowed to be developed.
Click to expand...

Its very strange.. they clearly like you. I'm finding Google getting less and less accurate lately, and Bing is more likely to surface a relevant result for obscure things much faster.
 
People seldom talk about America's protectionist policies and such.
 
surface said:
I think they should force Google developers to introduce millions of bugs so as to make it worse than Bing. I always get surprised when I find exactly what I am looking for when I do google search and this sort of skullduggery & magicfkkery should not be allowed to be developed.
Click to expand...
I trial ran Bing for a week with sole intention to switch if it does things I hoped it'd do. Each time it failed, I'd use Google as an alternative. I'm back on Google full time.

William paid those senators. 😃


Out of interest, is Sundar Pichai Tamil?
 
The question of whether Google is a monopoly is a subject of ongoing debate, involving legal, economic, and regulatory considerations. Here are some key points:

Market Dominance:​

  1. Search Engine Market: Google has a significant share of the global search engine market, often exceeding 90%. This dominance leads many to argue that Google effectively has a monopoly in this market.
  2. Advertising: Google's dominance extends to digital advertising, particularly in search ads. Google's control over such a large portion of online advertising gives it substantial market power.

Legal Perspective:​

  1. Antitrust Cases: Google has faced multiple antitrust lawsuits in various jurisdictions, including the European Union and the United States. These lawsuits typically argue that Google's practices stifle competition and harm consumers, such as by prioritizing its own services in search results.
  2. Regulatory Scrutiny: Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide have scrutinized Google for potentially anti-competitive behavior, such as its control over Android, Chrome, and the Google Play Store. However, not all cases conclude that Google is a monopoly, as legal definitions of monopoly vary and often require proving that the company has abused its market dominance.

Counterarguments:​

  1. Consumer Choice: Google argues that consumers have choices, such as Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo, even if they are less popular. This suggests that competition exists, even if it is not on an equal footing.
  2. Innovation and Quality: Some argue that Google's dominance is due to superior products and innovation, which benefit consumers, rather than unfair practices.

Conclusion:​

While Google has a dominant position in several key markets, whether it qualifies as a monopoly depends on legal interpretations and the outcome of ongoing and future regulatory actions. The company's practices continue to be scrutinized, with potential implications for how monopoly power is defined in the digital age.
 

Google: A Monopoly in Question​

Yes, a U.S. court recently ruled that Google illegally maintained a monopoly over search and search advertising. This is a significant development in the ongoing debate about Google's market dominance.

However, it's important to note that:

  • The case is ongoing: The ruling is just the beginning. There will likely be appeals and further legal battles.
  • Other markets: While Google has a dominant position in search, its market share in other areas like smartphones (Android) and online advertising is also substantial but faces competition from companies like Apple, Samsung, and Meta.
  • Innovation: Google has a history of fostering innovation and creating new products and services. This can both reinforce its market position and challenge it.
Ultimately, whether Google's actions constitute anti-competitive behavior and warrant breaking up the company is a complex issue with far-reaching implications.

Would you like to know more about the specific allegations against Google, or perhaps discuss the potential impacts of this ruling?
 

Is Google a Monopoly? A Deep Dive into Big Tech’s Dominance and What it Means for South Africa​

Google’s market dominance is a topic that continues to spark debate worldwide, raising the question: Is Google a monopoly? While the tech giant’s influence is undeniable, the answer isn't straightforward, involving complex legal, economic, and regulatory considerations. Let’s explore the key factors in this debate and what they mean, particularly for South Africans.

Market Dominance: More Than Just a Search Engine​

Google controls an overwhelming share of the global search engine market, with estimates suggesting a market share exceeding 90%. In South Africa, as in many other parts of the world, “Googling” has become synonymous with searching the web, highlighting the company’s pervasive presence in our daily lives.

This dominance isn’t limited to search alone. Google’s reach extends to digital advertising, particularly in search ads, where it controls a substantial portion of the market. This influence has led many to argue that Google holds monopoly power, especially when smaller competitors struggle to gain a foothold.

The Legal Landscape: Scrutiny and Antitrust Cases​

Globally, Google has been the subject of multiple antitrust lawsuits, particularly in the United States and the European Union. These lawsuits typically accuse Google of anti-competitive behavior, such as prioritizing its own services in search results and leveraging its dominance in the Android ecosystem to suppress competition.

In South Africa, although local regulators have not yet taken similar action, the global legal battles set a precedent. Should South African authorities decide to investigate, Google’s practices could come under similar scrutiny here.

The South African Perspective: Salaries and Affordability​

Working at Google isn’t just prestigious—it’s also lucrative. The average salary for a Google employee is around $133,000 annually (about R2.5 million). This level of income puts Google employees in an elite bracket, far above the average South African salary.

With such a salary, what kind of lifestyle can a Google employee afford in South Africa? Consider the car market: a Google salary could easily afford you a luxury vehicle, such as a Mercedes-Benz C-Class or a BMW 3 Series, both of which are well within reach for someone earning R2.5 million per year. For context, these cars are considered high-end in South Africa, where the average household income is significantly lower.

Monopoly or Market Leader?​

Google argues that it isn’t a monopoly because consumers have alternatives, such as Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo. While these alternatives exist, their market share is minimal compared to Google’s, which leads critics to argue that competition isn’t truly viable.

Furthermore, Google’s defenders often point to the company’s innovation and quality of products as the reasons for its dominance. They argue that Google’s market position is a result of offering superior services, which ultimately benefit consumers.

The Future of Google in South Africa​

Whether Google is a monopoly remains a contested issue. As global regulatory bodies continue to scrutinize Google’s practices, there could be ripple effects that impact how South African authorities and consumers view the tech giant.

For now, Google’s dominance in the market is clear, and its influence on South African consumers is undeniable. Whether this will translate into regulatory action locally remains to be seen, but the debate is far from over.

As South Africa continues to navigate its own digital transformation, the role of tech giants like Google will likely remain a critical topic for both policymakers and consumers alike.
 
Communists just communisting around.
 
There is no seach monopoly. Anyone can just as easily use any other search engine or browser. Most people freely choose Google.
 
R13... said:
Oh, riet, my sweet summer child.
Click to expand...
Please tell me why you cannot use bing, duckduckgo yandex?

Or what laws prevent any other person from building their own search engine?
 
Monopoly
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.
"the state's monopoly of radio and television broadcasting"
Click to expand...

Google is not the only search engine.
Google is not the only online advertisement space.
It is not the only business directory
It is not the only map gps service.

As long as there is no regulation that protects Google market dominance it is all good. It is not a monopoly by any definition.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter