TheChamp
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2011
- Messages
- 57,360
Oh yes, I forgot about Numsa.SAFTU also want him gone because he's some sort of privatisation harbinger. I think Eskom only have NUM and Solidaritiet as recognised unions.
Oh yes, I forgot about Numsa.SAFTU also want him gone because he's some sort of privatisation harbinger. I think Eskom only have NUM and Solidaritiet as recognised unions.
Does him being a thief make him incompetent? Is it possible that he can be a thief and also be good at the job? He is a qualified engineer and he has a long career at Eskom, he started there as a trainee and went through the ranks, all the way to the top.Koko is a fukking thief, through and through. He had the luck of the draw re. load shedding.
I am fascinated that the CEO can not only be tasked to immediately stop load shedding, but also just fix infrastructure that hasn't been maintained for 27 years. He is only as effective as his ExCo and the technical managers on the ground.
He is there to manage and to try and stop the rot, so that maintenance can be done properly and within budget.
He is not a "sparky" and does not have to be one either.
At least he is not stealing and not corrupt, like practically ALL his predecessors.
Please tell me you are kidding...?Does him being a thief make him incompetent? Is it possible that he can be a thief and also be good at the job? He is a qualified engineer and he has a long career at Eskom, he started there as a trainee and went through the ranks, all the way to the top.
Of course I am not necessarily saying he was good since there are plenty allegations against but responding to a technical analysis by saying he was a thief through and through is not exactly a compelling argument.
Just saying...
No, I was not kidding, but never mind.Please tell me you are kidding...?
Only job he was good at is stealing.
Definitely...No, I was not kidding, but never mind.
You'll probably need to do a monthly GW in maintanence times months to get an annualized GW.months of capacity given to maintenance. I think most would be surprised to find that Jacob Maroga and Matshela Koko have probably done the most applied effort in prioritizing maintenance.I just pulled all the numbers from the Eskom annual reports, and it shows that maintenance was the highest when EAF was the highest and load-shedding was non-existent. It was during the time when Matshela Koko was in charge of generation.
It is not what people want to hear, and he is accused of cooking the books, but I can not find any objective data to show that he was not good. You cannot fudge breakdowns and load-shedding.
Is there any data that shows that Andre de Ruyter is doing a good job on the generation side?
I think it is the most credible data we have. If those reports are not accurate, there is no way to verify any facts.What is the credibility of those annual reports like? I mean they lie about everything. Serious question.
You are on the money about that... we are lied to about that the most.I think it is the most credible data we have. If those reports are not accurate, there is no way to verify any facts.
The last resort is to only look at load-shedding, but it does not provide a lot of insight.
Sounds a bit like Stoute Wouter Basson; all unproven allegations although, to be fair, they tried hard to nail ou Wouter and remains innocent. No charges against Mr Koko that I recall.Does him being a thief make him incompetent? Is it possible that he can be a thief and also be good at the job? He is a qualified engineer and he has a long career at Eskom, he started there as a trainee and went through the ranks, all the way to the top.
Of course I am not necessarily saying he was good since there are plenty allegations against but responding to a technical analysis by saying he was a thief through and through is not exactly a compelling argument.
Just saying...
Exactly - planned/preventative maintenance was non existent, or at best, very limited!Dear article writer - on that table, please include number of MWh put into maintenance. I think that will completely change the picture![]()
Planned/preventative maintenance were just about non-existent. And that fact affects the current reliability status at eskom.Elaborate!
A good manager does not have to know the ins-and-outs of power generation if he has the correct management team at his disposal.No surprise, I recall this.
What does De Ruyter know about power... f0kkol. He can tell you about cardboard boxes, that's about it.
Does him being a thief make him incompetent? Is it possible that he can be a thief and also be good at the job? He is a qualified engineer and he has a long career at Eskom, he started there as a trainee and went through the ranks, all the way to the top.
Of course I am not necessarily saying he was good since there are plenty allegations against but responding to a technical analysis by saying he was a thief through and through is not exactly a compelling argument.
Just saying...
You and your national party again, Yawwwnnn...You sound like someone who would've voted for Zuma, twice.
There's an old wise saying that an old psychologist friend always tells me when I ignore red flags in a potential relationship.. the best prediction of future behaviour is past behaviour.
Maybe that's the reason the old NP was able to predict the ANC's future actions so accurately?
That's not very PC of you.Looks as if the EFF are being retarded again...
![]()
Eskom boss André de Ruyter to open criminal case after threats against him on social media | News24
Following threats and incitement to violence against him on Twitter, Eskom boss André de Ruyter is set to open a case of intimidation.www.news24.com