US and NATO escalation of conflict with Russia is leading to war - PART 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

s0lar

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
5,234
What is your definition of defeat Russia?
Did Afghanistan defeat the soviet union?
Yes.

Edit: South Africa lost in Angola as well as US in veitnam and Afghanistan. They were all not defeated.
 
Last edited:

Pak Fa Fui

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2021
Messages
7,748
Who is the right and who is the left for supporters in the war, so many lines are crossed.
The right is supporting Ukraine right?
 

s0lar

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
5,234
No. Russia can throw enough sh*t in to this to force a win. And they have to, Putin's legacy depends on it.

Russia will be sending back a lot of bodybags though. More than they will want to admit.
Sure. They have to keep sentiment in Ukraine in regard to the civilian population. It’s not Baghdad where you can just carpet bomb and call it a day.
 

Solarion

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
21,887
Question. You think Ukrainian is going to defeat Russia?

Perhaps, but there will be nothing left of Ukraine if they do. The Russians will mine the place up and poison the wells so to speak. They may even irradiate the water supplies and rivers and destroy everything on their way out. If we can't have it nobody will.
 

thestaggy

Honorary Master
Joined
May 11, 2011
Messages
21,147
Sure. They have to keep sentiment in Ukraine in regard to the civilian population. It’s not Baghdad where you can just carpet bomb and call it a day.
They lost that sentiment probably two weeks ago based on the evidence of Ukrainian resistance.

Russia have sucked themselves in to Afghanistan 2.0 for now.

The US restrained themselves in Iraq and Afghanistan because they wanted the support of the populace. They lost. Russia needs to decide: at all costs victory or whatever it is they are doing.
 

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
Russia planning to launch chemical weapons and generating the narrative for Nico, Narrow et al to follow blindly.

Playing devils advocate here, but isn't that exactly what Nulan did herself? Preemptively stated that if there is an attack it will definitely be of Russian origin.
How would you prove either side during wartime besides just picking a side to believe?
By the time the truth comes out the event will already have had the desired consequences.
 

s0lar

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
5,234
The US restrained themselves in Iraq and Afghanistan because they wanted the support of the populace. They lost. Russia needs to decide: at all costs victory or whatever it is they are doing.
Exactly, from my vantage point it’s looks to me Russia is restraining themselves from a political stand point and being a neighbour.

Contrary to popular belief. Putin is many thing but not a blood thirsty idiot he being made out to be.

Who would have thought we agree.
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
Russia planning to launch chemical weapons and generating the narrative for Nico, Narrow et al to follow blindly.

are you that far behind the times?

US and UK politicians have been saying this for days already

meaning the west is planning another chemical attack false flag. just. like. Syria.

that's how they prep idiots like you, repeat a lie often enough, act out a false flag and buka is ready to march to war :ROFL:
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
22,991
Well, fair point. It may depend on your point of view whilst that was my own. Innocent people who number in the millions are being completely and utterly abused. I could never agree with any of that, it goes against the grain.
That happens with every war. It's normal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top