US and NATO escalation of conflict with Russia is leading to war - PART 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gyre

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
9,929
pretty much nothing, they're only now threatening to ban Met platforms due to its outright support of hate directed at Russia

I have a lot of different news sources saying that Russia is limiting social media - is everything contrary to your views MSM now?
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
and there you go off on a tangent, stick to the topic: chemical attack false flag, who has done one before and who did they try to pin it on?

do you honestly think they won't try it again?
Assad and he tried to pin it on the rebels and then apparently it never even happened.
 

Gyre

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
9,929
you're the kid, that one putting his hands over his ears shouting "I can't hear you", you know the kind ...

this exact false flag was done before and involved the same opposing parties, you can see it coming a mile away provided you have a modicum of common sense

What was a false flag about Russia saying they're not going to invade, to suddenly being on Ukrainian soil, still saying they're not invading?

What is going to convince you that they're invading?
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
Assad and he tried to pin it on the rebels and then apparently it never even happened.
oh god, there is no hope for you

the "white helmets" that acted it out washing fake foam off fake victims for CNN's cameras ... that was done by ... Assad? :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:
 

The Trutherizer

Executive Member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
8,263
:ROFL: the west outright banned and blocked any alternative information

that's not winning an "information war", that is fascism pissing all over freedom of expression

do you think Hitler "won the information war" back home when he eliminated alternative viewpoints? wow, what an impressive victory ... o_O
Not any. Only the ones from within Russia. They are useless for your argument in any case.
Unlike in Russia. In most of the rest of the world (Not China notably - ally of Russia) outlets with varying opinion, regardless of how they are positioned relative to government opinion, are allowed.
In Russia. People get beat up on the street and arrested for saying anything that differs from the official state approved narrative.
Those who rely on them for information have hardly any idea what's going on in Ukraine at all.

So please. Don't try to come with that. We're here exchanging different opinions. In Russia right now, if we were not all careful of covering our online activities, the secret services could very likely come knocking on the door of those on one side of the discussion.

Goebbelsdegook as usual.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
you're the kid, that one putting his hands over his ears shouting "I can't hear you", you know the kind ...

this exact false flag was done before and involved the same opposing parties, you can see it coming a mile away provided you have a modicum of common sense
Indeed.

Buynaksk circa 1999, updated for '22 with added Chernobyl.

Sugar and what not, amirite?
 

Pak Fa Fui

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2021
Messages
7,748
You're like the snivelling kid that set a house on fire, pointing across the road at the kids that burnt the house down first.

If you want to put the West on trial for their crimes, do it in their own thread, but don't be deluded in denying what is happening just because you have beef with the west and MSM.

When America commits its next war crime, should we go on about Russia for 1000 pages?
You can’t ignore the similarities.

US invaded a sovereign nation check
US bombed hospitals and schools check
US killed 1000s of civilians check
US created a humanitarian crisis check
US used chemical weapons check
US created millions of refugees check
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wut

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
A quick google search is easy to do, but I know the effort will be wasted.

Name some sources you trust and I'll have a look on them for news.
hell you can cite Reuters, CNN, BBC for all I care, I just want to laugh at what I suspect will be pure conjecture ...

"sources tell us"
"seems like"
"likely being limited"


blablablala, all BS, as opposed to the outright blocks of Russian media announced by the very organizations blocking them
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
hell you can cite Reuters, CNN, BBC for all I care, I just want to laugh at what I suspect will be pure conjecture ...

"sources tell us"
"seems like"
"likely being limited"


blablablala, all BS, as opposed to the outright blocks of Russian media announced by the very organizations blocking them
But if its RT, it is THE gospel truth ...
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
outlets with varying opinion, regardless of how they are positioned relative to government opinion, are allowed
show me a single source being allowed that is not towing the pro-Ukraine, anti-Russia line right now

or are you that gullible that you think the entire press core across the world actually agree on something unanimously for the first time in human history?
 

Gyre

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
9,929
You can’t ignore the similarities.

US invaded a sovereign nation check
US bombed hospitals and schools check
US killed 1000s of civilians check
US created a humanitarian crisis check
US used chemical weapons check
US created millions of refugees check

US And Russia bad? Okay? Where did anyone disagree?

How is it relevant to this thread?
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
But if its RT, it is THE gospel truth ...
if it is RT or ZH at least it gives you links to the sources

you know, so you can go read it without their interpretation if you wish, not that you would know that seeing as you've likely never bothered to check, all too happy to call something biased without even confirming it
 

Gyre

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
9,929
hell you can cite Reuters, CNN, BBC for all I care, I just want to laugh at what I suspect will be pure conjecture ...

"sources tell us"
"seems like"
"likely being limited"


blablablala, all BS, as opposed to the outright blocks of Russian media announced by the very organizations blocking them

So you accept nothing, because it's what you believe?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top