NarrowBandFtw
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 27,726
China abstained from voting in the security council ... can YOU read?They also did not support them in the Security Council.
Can you read?
China abstained from voting in the security council ... can YOU read?They also did not support them in the Security Council.
Can you read?
True but it wouldn't be like it had much choice though, it's not a speedboat and if it was egressing .... Just saying it's a bit grey if the transaction had taken place PRIOR to hostilities.If it was in the English Channel, then its technically not open sea, its still territorial waters for either France or the UK.
that was some very explosive peace keeping over the years
![]()
NATO bombing of Yugoslavia - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
www.corbettreport.com
you're talking complete kak as has been the case in this thread for the most part, China urged both parties to start talks, they did not urge Russia to stop fighting, quote me the words which you believe backs your blatant lie:Dude, China told Putin to stop fighting
www.mintpressnews.com
KIEV, UKRAINE – Amid soaring tensions with Russia, the United States is spending a fortune on foreign interference campaigns in Ukraine. Washington’s regime-change arm, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), has spent $22.4 million on operations inside the country since 2014, when democratically-elected President Viktor Yanukovych was overthrown and replaced by a successor government handpicked by the U.S. Those operations included propping up and training pro-Western political parties, funding pliant media organizations, and subsidizing massive privatization drives that benefit foreign multinational corporations, all in an effort to secure U.S. control over the country that NED President Carl Gershman called “the biggest prize” in Europe
says the retard condoning unilateral military strikes, if NATO may do it, then Russia may do itYou are not rational
Bulk of Russian forces just 18 miles from Kyiv, according to UK intelligence
The bulk of Russian forces are now only 18.6 miles (30 kilometers) from the center of Kyiv, the British Ministry of Defence said Saturday.
It also warned Russia that casualties are “likely to be heavy and greater than anticipated or acknowledged by the Kremlin.”
According to the latest intelligence update from the ministry, "Russia has yet to gain control of the airspace over Ukraine greatly reducing the effectiveness of the Russian Air Force."
It said that "Ukrainian Armed Forces continue to put up staunch resistance across the country."
you're talking complete kak as has been the case in this thread for the most part, China urged both parties to start talks, they did not urge Russia to stop fighting, quote me the words which you believe backs your blatant lie:
![]()
Do they really think pushing a nuclear power into a corner is a good idea?
says the retard condoning unilateral military strikes, if NATO may do it, then Russia may do it
there is zero difference, you condone both or you condemn both, choose
so does Russia, they've used those exact same wordsRead everything which was said. China supports Ukrainian sovereignty
by who's law? where did NATO have any right whatsoever to enter another sovereign, non-member, state and just start blowing shyte up?Serbia was asked for a long time to not take rather lawless action in Kosovo
The existing status quo, as per the Budapest Memorandum. (signed by Russia)Expansion, existing status quo.
by who's law? where did NATO have any right whatsoever to enter another sovereign, non-member, state and just start blowing shyte up?
do you know what sovereign means?
indeed, and Russia is being "a bit heavy handed" now, glad we're on the same page, welcome komradeYes it was a bit heavy handed