Vrotappel
Bulls fan
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2005
- Messages
- 25,982
What security situation??Negotiations as per the numerous occasions Russia attempted to table in forum the NATO promises and security situation and was laughed at and called a tyrant.
What security situation??Negotiations as per the numerous occasions Russia attempted to table in forum the NATO promises and security situation and was laughed at and called a tyrant.
Ukraine has a land border with 4 NATO countries, so Putin invading Ukraine brings Russia closer to those 4 borders.I am in tears about this one, you clearly do not. Why are you arguing?
Trouble has been brewing for a long time. The irritating bit is the assumption that the entire world doesn't know it.China’s Xi Jinping stresses cooperation with North Korea’s Kim under ‘new situation’: state media
![]()
China’s Xi Jinping stresses cooperation with North Korea’s Kim under ‘new situation’: state media
Chinese President Xi Jinping emphasized cooperation and friendship to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in a message between the two countries, North Korean state media reported Saturday.www.foxnews.com
Big trouble on the way for the whole world. Believe it or not, I do not care.
Why would Russia want to wreck a neutral nation. I mean really I am curious as to what you believe this war is about if you dont get that?So you'd be happy having your house and family as a neutral zone between two gangs, so if the aggresive one wants to wreck you you have no defence?
no NATO member has ever directly engaged Russia in any war theatre
they're so unafraid they shy away from fights, even when Russia annexes Crimea, that's some convincing unafraidness![]()
I called this out as a target for the Russians over a year ago. Very strategic for Crimea this.![]()
Liz Truss says ‘nowhere left to hide’ for Putin allies – as it happened
Pipeline in Kharkiv and oil terminal in Vasylkiv believed hit as US, UK and EU move to exclude ‘selected’ banks from global payments systemwww.theguardian.com
Balance of power politics.What's the alternative, just sit back and let the bad evil guy take over the world? We've seen that movie before.
And yet it was the Americans that said they would invade ...Yet you are too afraid to put your neck out and state what you believe? This is your only post in this thread.
There are many valid reasons for not believing in US intelligence, especially when it comes to Russia.
Trouble has been brewing for a long time. The irritating bit is the assumption that the entire world doesn't know it.
Please tell me youre kidding? I am getting rather tired of repeating myself.What security situation??
Imperial expansion. Glory of the motherland. Call it what you wishWhy would Russia want to wreck a neutral nation. I mean really I am curious as to what you believe this war is about if you dont get that?
Please add me ****er. You are supporting someone that is destroying the world. By justifying his actions you are supporting him.I only have two people on my ignore list. And this is why Mirai made the cut.
View attachment 1255390
Putin's little boy dreams.Why would Russia want to wreck a neutral nation. I mean really I am curious as to what you believe this war is about if you dont get that?
Not afraid of being afraid?Just that they're not afraid.
Repeat yourself.Please tell me youre kidding? I am getting rather tired of repeating myself.
Not afraid of being afraid?
Sorry you see it that way. In my view NATO members have caused more death and war with "sovereign" states than Russia ever could bar a nuclear fallout. Which you support.Please add me ****er. You are supporting someone that is destroying the world. By justifying his actions you are supporting him.
Dudes a complete nutcase with zero facts, so I may have to do the same.I only have two people on my ignore list. And this is why Mirai made the cut.
View attachment 1255390
Thanks for the meaningful debate.Putin's little boy dreams.
No, there is a difference between not wanting to be in a war and acting with callous indifference to the safety of civilians when you are a soldier driving an armored vehicle. They might both be victims but soldiers in a natural position of power have a duty to treat civilians with respect even if they don't want to be in a war...Well. No one died right? Is it really worth killing someone over?
You said it yourself, the people in the wars tend to be forced into them.
Imagine yourself in said military vehicle, riding around the city for the past 2 hours trying to find your unit to know avail. You know full well that you're a massive target and likely expecting a missile on your head any second now. Personally I would likely be pretty scared, even terrified.
What are you in the military if you just leave that vehicle where it stands and walk away? What are the consequences?
My guess, driver likely immobilized the vehicle on purpose given that the last place he wanted to be was in that god damned thing.
Was it right?
No... But neither of those two victims actually want to be in this war do they? They are simply the cost...