US and NATO escalation of conflict with Russia is leading to war

Status
Not open for further replies.

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
I am in tears about this one, you clearly do not. Why are you arguing?
Ukraine has a land border with 4 NATO countries, so Putin invading Ukraine brings Russia closer to those 4 borders.

Hence the excuse that he doesn't want a NATO neighbour doesn't fly.

Since he stated he believes Ukraine is implicitly Russian and is now invading it, it certainly suggest he wishes Ukraine to be part of Russia.

What error in geography have I made?

bb737e8443275cad5235e894c77e88b9.jpg
 

The Trutherizer

Executive Member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
8,261

China’s Xi Jinping stresses cooperation with North Korea’s Kim under ‘new situation’: state media​






Big trouble on the way for the whole world. Believe it or not, I do not care.
Trouble has been brewing for a long time. The irritating bit is the assumption that the entire world doesn't know it.
 

s0lar

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
5,234
So you'd be happy having your house and family as a neutral zone between two gangs, so if the aggresive one wants to wreck you you have no defence?
Why would Russia want to wreck a neutral nation. I mean really I am curious as to what you believe this war is about if you dont get that?
 

Mirai

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 21, 2017
Messages
11,243
no NATO member has ever directly engaged Russia in any war theatre

they're so unafraid they shy away from fights, even when Russia annexes Crimea, that's some convincing unafraidness :ROFL:

I'm not so sure if Russian mercs did not get taken out in Syria and the like. In Vietnam and Korea they did engage each other occasionally. Usually Americans won.

Turkey did engage that Russian fighter near its border. Russia then stopped flying near the Turkish border because Turkey would keep on shooting them down.

I don't know if you're being silly on purpose but NATO is a defensive pact. Ukraine is not a member. But if they were really scared, if Russia was in gamechanger mode, then they would stop supplying weapons openly to the Ukrainians.

As for the Ukrainians they had a long insurgency against the Soviets. That's Stalinist Soviets. Those guys who would shoot up a whole village for assisting the Ukrainians or relocate them. Cracking the Ukrainian nut may be tough. We already saw what the Afghani farmers did with those stingers.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
What's the alternative, just sit back and let the bad evil guy take over the world? We've seen that movie before.
Balance of power politics.

Russia cannot support a much larger territory. The USSR collapsed because it was to big.

Even the idea that Russia is trying to occupy Ukraine now is stupid.
Nobody is trying to take over the world.
 

s0lar

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
5,234
Please add me ****er. You are supporting someone that is destroying the world. By justifying his actions you are supporting him.
Sorry you see it that way. In my view NATO members have caused more death and war with "sovereign" states than Russia ever could bar a nuclear fallout. Which you support.
 

Cray

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
34,549
Well. No one died right? Is it really worth killing someone over?

You said it yourself, the people in the wars tend to be forced into them.

Imagine yourself in said military vehicle, riding around the city for the past 2 hours trying to find your unit to know avail. You know full well that you're a massive target and likely expecting a missile on your head any second now. Personally I would likely be pretty scared, even terrified.

What are you in the military if you just leave that vehicle where it stands and walk away? What are the consequences?

My guess, driver likely immobilized the vehicle on purpose given that the last place he wanted to be was in that god damned thing.

Was it right?

No... But neither of those two victims actually want to be in this war do they? They are simply the cost...
No, there is a difference between not wanting to be in a war and acting with callous indifference to the safety of civilians when you are a soldier driving an armored vehicle. They might both be victims but soldiers in a natural position of power have a duty to treat civilians with respect even if they don't want to be in a war...

Hang him from the yard arm is a figure of speech, I don't mean I want the guy executed, I mean the guy should be made to pay for an act that put a civilian in danger for no reason.

All that assumes that what he did was intentional, after seeing another angle am not sure that's true...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top