US and NATO escalation of conflict with Russia is leading to war

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pak Fa Fui

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2021
Messages
7,748
Black and brown people with Ukrainian passports are being allowed in. Not defending Poland but that’s their rules at the moment.

There are about 8000 African and Indian and other students being rejected at the borders.
 

TheMightyQuinn

Not amused...
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
31,961
Tanks used to be a safer place to be when in a war zone, these days it's probably safer on foot.

I am no expert, but that did not look legit.

That tank seemed to be already knocked out? Camera man standing in the wide open taking footage.

Russian tank not doing maneuvers or counter attacking with its "light" weapons?

Maybe I'm wrong, but....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wut

bridgeburner

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
316
Yet you are too afraid to put your neck out and state what you believe? This is your only post in this thread.

There are many valid reasons for not believing in US intelligence, especially when it comes to Russia.

I tend to avoid the toxic threads on MyBB hence I haven't posted in here. But I'll say what's going on is very delicate. Russia unilaterally redrawing borders in Eastern Ukraine and their subsequent invasion is wholly unacceptable and Putin isn't covering himself in glory. But he has taken advantage of some weak Western leadership. I get that he's afraid of Ukraine joining NATO but he can't dictate their foreign policy for them or what direction they want to align themselves with, even without joining NATO. And this narrative of "de-Nazifying" Ukraine is an utter load of rubbish. I've just yet to see a convincing argument for justifying this invasion (spoiler alert: their isn't) from a Russian apologist. South Africa is full of these apologists pushing their double standards.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,063
I know, but getting a Z marking means it's going to be positioned near the border possibly as a visual deterrent to other smaller NATO countries.

A visual deterrent, no, they have ‘shared’ satellite and aerial intelligence. It will only serve Russian’s perceived enemies more targets to strike, the only reason Russia would have an interest to move nuclear assets to and within Ukraine is with the intention to establish missile bases like they did within Crimea, this being said, to also remind those who like to pick on NATO’s ‘newly’ established missile bases. All these nations, all-inclusive, like to bargain with their striking capabilities.

Russia had a lot to say about the anti-ballistic base established in Romania some years ago. You see, this particular site which can launch anti-ballistic missiles is also capable to launch ballistic missiles, though I have no idea about the perimeters and which nuclear ordnance it can accommodate. Russia, though, believes it is a threat to their sovereignty.

Come to think about all this... the UN is very anti-productive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top