Well, I have read alot of the comments from members of this forum and it is all the news right now and everyone has their 2c. A forum is not only a space were we should be shouting and fighting, but also a space were one should listen. I'm chuffed to see that many here are been respectful to others (by majority)
While a lot of commentary here is personal and devoid from facts or deflective in nature. Many commenters here we fail to be objective to facts and rather debate on whichever position we follow, be it pro-Ukraine or pro-Russian. They has been some members who have been pretty bias but fairly so, in these issues you need to know the pre- "invasion" background and the geo-politics of the region and military capabilities of the two belligerents.
Now I will be honest and say that I am Pro-Russian,
Appreciate the admission of your biases, I definitely have no historic feelings either way except for an intense dislike of Putin so will try and keep things factual.
1. We have for the past years 13 000- 15 000 Russian speaking people in Ukraine who have been killed by Ukraine. Many have been gang raped, goods looted. Honestly, no nation like Russia can accept that type of situation
Do you have a source for those numbers...? While I agree that deaths of people are horrible, those are not all civilian deaths... Can you verify that all of those deaths were Russian speakers?
Your figure just mentions Russia speaking deaths, but a substantial portion of that number is made up of Ukrainian government troops. The Ukrainian Civil war is not one-sided, many of the people on both sides were engaged in active combat. The civilian deaths are obviously horrible but painting all the deaths in the Ukrainian civil war as being inflicted on one side by the other is a little dishonest. 4600 of those deaths above were Ukrainian government forces...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War
Do you dispute that Russia has been arming the rebels throughout the period of this Civil war but is not claiming the high ground for casualties it has a big responsibility for ?
2. Minsk 2 accord. In the early 90's we had Gorbachev who allowed East Germany to be incorporated into Germany as a nation with the rule that NATO not expand and from 97 NATO has expanded in Eastern Europe
That rule was never formalized or signed into any treaty, care to comment on the Budapest memorandum where Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for a signed guarantee of recognition of sovereignty by Russia, something that was violated by the annexation of Ukraine.
3. The Russian military operation has by majority focused on military installations, people of Ukraine are not afraid of Russian military men, and some semblance of life is still going on in Ukraine. Civil deaths are few and it seems that Kiev citizens are now been armed and are looting the city
Source for Ukrainian citizens looting their own city? Civilian deaths certainly seems to be ratcheting up now...
4. Propaganda that we are receiving (including Russian media) is largely trying to mould our minds again the current operation
This I agree with.
5. I support a short demilitarization of Ukraine which will prevent further loss of lives in eastern Ukraine and ALSO prevent any a greater Russian aggression against Ukraine
What do you see as the end game for the two "independent regions" , drawn into Russia?
Not that what I will now say make a difference, but everyone here needs to separate their emotions and reasonable facts and likelihoods. Of note is that Biden said that Russia does not have "the right" to recognize an independent state, it is ironic that George Bush recognised Ukraine as a country outside the USSR which was a shock, ironic.
Look at the countries that have recognized the Donetsk and Luhansk, Russia excepted, are those countries that you hold in high esteem in terms of respect for human rights?
On the other hand, how does one feel living in Lutsk been brought into the fray by now having to move and suffer. Now who is the perp's here? You know.... But President Zelansky obviously was mislead and used as a pawn to make his population suffer. Russian citizens will now also suffer due to the sanctions as well.
The person most responsible for the current suffering in the Ukraine is Putin. If Russian civilians suffer because of sanctions the source of blame should only rest on one person's shoulders.
India, China, Africa, S.America populations, not necessarily governments support Russia with the scope they have about the events.
How do you know this?