Grant
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2007
- Messages
- 60,612
Examining post histories would render a more accurate result.Might be some interesting results if it were to go to poll.
Examining post histories would render a more accurate result.Might be some interesting results if it were to go to poll.
It's no small item though, many Russians see them as being part of Russia. That area during the USSR used to be named after Stalin and often the people believe that they are still in Russia.
The US instigated the riots in Khazakstan earlier this year as well and last year in Belarus (although then the protestors turned around and supported Putin)
Now if you're Putin and you see.
Georgia invited to Nato in 2005
Ukraine being a weapons dump
Riots, coups and instigations on your border.
What do you make of the situation? I personally think that it was monumentally stupid to have this antagnostic foreign policy against Russia. The US deals with thugs like China, Erdogan and Saudi Arabia all the time on much better terms.
No it was a full blown coup d'état, the snipers in the Maidan revolution all were CIA trained and many of them not even Ukranian.
Unless he is the policeman, which appears to be this case.And the guy who bliksemed him goes to jail for committing assault..
Because for Lazarus to exist, Jesus has to exist. You cannot just conjure a new reality into existence. There is either full truth or full lie, no in between.Not to be ugly(because I know tone is unreadable on the net), but how does that differ from the Bible? How is believing a person like Lazraus exists any different to believing in a hero during the war? Details may be incorrect but the actions could still be the same?
BS is BS is BS... intention does not alter how BS this BS happens to be unless the intention is to tell the truth.An example, a Ukrainian is called the Reaper for killing 10-20 russians. There might be a guy sitting somewhere blissfully unaware that there is a legend at all, with 40 russian's dogtags? In a war where a lot of factors are out of people's control, what is a little faith and hope?
See before the next world event jumps out and hits us, would you be kind enough to tell us what subjects and events you are an expert of in advance, so we know when it hits if you are indeed an actual expert?
I mean, that's Covid and now Ukraine that you have a contrarian view of and appear to be incredibly well informed of. So are you in fact just 'at it' and, as I suspect, googling like crazy to defend the anti establishment position?
Well, perhaps you could enlighten us all with your result set?Examining post histories would render a more accurate result.
But but but but.... they were helping the downtrodden..... have some COMPASSION man.Unless he is the policeman, which appears to be this case.
Can we at least admit that NATO's policy to pump money and especially weapons into the ultranationalist government of Ukraine was idiotic?
Looked Putin in the eye.....and said "we will send you the swift 0roof of payment tomorrow"Lol brilliantly opportunistic if it is even true.
Granted Russia's initial strategy did look to minimise casualties, as they seem to have assumed the Ukrainians would capitulate as they invaded.
However, the indiscriminate shelling of Kharkiv with cluster munitions yesterday was a flagrant disregard for civilians and did result in civilian deaths.
The fact that it was launched while negotiations were on was a clear strategy to push the Ukrainians to settle.
It seems Macron has pushed Putin to halt such attacks. Let's hope that he keeps to that word.
Granted Russia's initial strategy did look to minimise casualties, as they seem to have assumed the Ukrainians would capitulate as they invaded.
However, the indiscriminate shelling of Kharkiv with cluster munitions yesterday was a flagrant disregard for civilians and did result in civilian deaths.
The fact that it was launched while negotiations were on was a clear strategy to push the Ukrainians to settle.
It seems Macron has pushed Putin to halt such attacks. Let's hope that he keeps to that word.
This might be the worst analogy I have ever heard.If you walk into a flooding river.... is it the river's fault that it drags you down?
Here's my take on this situation:Be objective or at least lets try, if not you defeat your own moral conscience. Follow your views on principal not not group interests. Point out faults even they are yours.
Talk about BS...If you walk into a flooding river.... is it the river's fault that it drags you down?
If you walk into a flooding river.... is it the river's fault that it drags you down?
Yes, your respected sources often do that.
Depends on what alternatives you are referring to.
The "they are all on the same whatsapp group" thing is a ridiculous delusion.
They are all beholden to the corporations they work for.
At the same time almost all of them are more activists than journalists and are increasingly leftist.... they are part of the propaganda system not an objective source of information.
All the truely independent journalists who have not toed the party line have been forced out of the clicke and into supposed alternative media as soon as they voice any opinion that is verboten..... this has had an obvious chilling effect on the rest.
I am being objective, which is why I brought up how it used to be. At that time no newspaper existed that was not political to the point of telling outright lies in favour of their party. Just as you can trust none of them then you can trust none of them now.
Or do you mean with "being objective" that I should agree with you?
Please share the evidence for this?
I recall that Putin didn't want to wait? He thought he was above other countries.