I'm sure they do. Do dictators also do it?
Why do you believe I believe what Putin says because he says it?
The alternative to the oft called MSM.
There is not just one homogeneous "alt" block... that is a myth.
Indeed. Why even mention this?
See above.
Including the independent ones who are nominated for Pulitzer prizes? 'Independent' being the operative word here.
If you don't write what a publication will publish they don't pay you.....
So not all of them? And especially not one who on another thread the people refusing to read her stuff here, including you, would have her hoisted high as a hero?
en.wikipedia.org
The one's that are not activists are just doing it for money like any other salary drawer.
I don't see how you can think the leaking of this particular scandal was all that much counter narrative.... it was political sure but that's it.... it really was a minor event narrative wise. Reporting this was at the time at least certainly not career ending stuff.
There are none as blind as those that will not see.
I have no dog in the fight. I'm saying that faced with two choices I would rather believe a respected journalist known for fighting the system than a dictator who controls the news.
And I am saying.... I very likely do not respect the journalists you respect. And even then.... I will make up my own mind and not be an NPC that believes whatever "my side" tells me to believe.... you are accusing me of doing what YOU are doing.
What seems to blow your mind is that there are more than two opinions on this.
I have only commented on the sources of information and where I would tend to lean if forced to choose.
You on the other hand have shown that you are so far down the rabbit hole you are incapable of being objective. And despite thinking you are above the media misinformation, it is actually quite the opposite and dictators like Putin and populists like Malema and Trump depend on people like you for their support and popularity. Well done.
No, the problem is I have not fallen into your rabbit hole of false dichotomies. You are the one failing to be objective because you believe that anyone that disagrees with your propaganda system is by that definition not being objective.
You claim to speak secularity.... but this all smacks of religion to me.