CaptainXarogFreeman's last hope.
Ultimately this is just bad faith posturing. One does not bring about electoral reforms by alleging widespread fraud in the specific areas you lost, through multiple spurious and meritless court actions.
I am keen to hear why the courts need to convene to hear whether Gnarls is an alien from Pluto?
We said we would compare notes after.Your framing is what is dishonest. A perfectly meritorious case could be brought before the courts by a party without legal standing, why insert it at all if your interests in the merits was sincere?
I actually outlined what I regard the merits to be to some degree to Buka yesterday. You won't have to sift through too many posts if your interest in genuine.
Again, a vacuous claim regarding the merits which doesn't actually mention the specifics of the merits, is worth zilch.
You can cry on my shoulder anytime.I don't want to spoil the fun, and I regret sharing as much as I did today, so I'll just leave you to believe that.
Please don't look into anything further, or gain any understanding about any of the things that are happening.
9735609 Dimensional chess. Lose 51 court cases and the Supreme Court case, the one that was totally going to unravel it all, to mislead the libs that Trump actually won.It's hilarious how easily the TDS-gang are completely mislead about literally everything that happens.
Trump wildly sowing the seeds of the next civil war.
Did he miss that the SC went past that point on the case which the cultists totally told us was gonna be the one that ends it for Biden and now sits dead on arrival?
No, that's just the excuse you came up with to avoid having to address the issue. But that's okay, that sort of attitude will come in handy, later.
Indeed, one alleges fraud in specific areas where evidence supports such a conclusion and an explanation for the statistical anomalies that the result presents is conspicuously lacking.
Nonsense. You can say it a million times, but it will remain as much a figment of your imagination as ever.
Except that the political process has stalled out regarding this very issue because one side treats meaningful reform as an attempt to engage in voter disenfranchisement, and I expect if we do a search on voter ID laws and your handle, we will indeed find that you have repeated those same talking points in the past.
If your puerile responses to the matter ever stooped to low as to actually respond to the allegations on the substance of their merits, maybe your retort would be worth something. But you're just another partisan hack repeating talking points you don't even fully understand.
If you look further down it states application (matching reference to Kelly's submission) denied by the court on Dec 8.
Sign up with Google
