US Election 2020 - Lame duck days

greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
CaptainOblivious said:
Actually, given that you cannot indicate what exactly the evidence would look like in the event that actual voter fraud did occur, and often the only evidence one could reasonably expect to find would be circumstancial, you do need to counter circumstancial evidence that's indication of something unlikely having happened, or nobody needs to take your skeptard routine seriously.


There are plenty of statistical anomalies. I posted a video last night indicating what one of the anomalies in Pennsylvania looked like with respect to the disparity between voter registrations and the eventual outcome. I have posted others as well. So far none of the lords of snark have deigned to formulate any sort of response.


Saying it was off while trying to claim that it was ultimately predictive as a strategy to excuse not having to address other statistical anomalies is desperately pathetic.


Why would you think someone rigging a vote against Trump is necessarily for the Dems? The establishment on both sides of the political aisle hate him and everything populist he stands for. And indeed, the fact that Trump is such an outlier with respect to the performance of Repubs in general, when he was wildly wildly popular among the base far beyond the popularity of any of the other candidates, is deeply suspect. His performance in his own parties primary is testament to that fact. And if you paid attention to the witness testimony alleging fraud, there are indeed claims that batches of ballots that appeared to be counterfeit were marked for no one but Biden.


spectator.us

Reasons why the 2020 presidential election is deeply puzzling

To say out-loud that you find the results of the 2020 election odd is to invite derision. You must be a crank. Well, count me one
spectator.us spectator.us

It's not that Biden didn't have a chance of winning, it's that his winning was very unlikely to occur while also upsetting all the historical trends that have traditionally coincided with the winning candidate. If only one or two of them ended up not being predictive, you could shrug it off, but when they're all out of whack simultaneously, then the statistical probabilities start to favour a rigged election as the more likely explanation, and it's no longer unreasonable to expect answers as to the cause of the statistical upset and to grow suspicious to the degree that one cannot be proffered.
Click to expand...
Screenshot 2020-12-09 at 09.36.54.png

Screenshot 2020-12-09 at 09.36.07.png

Screenshot 2020-12-09 at 09.43.01.png

You've lost your whole damn mind.

Historically unpopular potus *cAn'T lOsE* to challenger he never once lead in the build up, and had a 89% shot at the win.

tReNdS bRu! TrEnDs!

Jesus.
 
B

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
CaptainOblivious said:
Nov 19:

www.rasmussenreports.com

61% Think Trump Should Concede to Biden

Most voters now believe President Trump should admit that he lost the election, although they’re less certain their friends and neighbors would agree. They’re more closely divided, however, over whether the Democrats stole the election as Trump contends.
www.rasmussenreports.com www.rasmussenreports.com


Nov 29:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333113548281683977
Click to expand...

Like I said, what were the questions asked?

The question asked was

3* How likely is it that Democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure that Biden would win - very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely or not at all likely?
Click to expand...


Since 61% said it is Not at All Likely, 39% of them ranged from not very likely to somewhat likely to very likely. So to say 30% of Democrats think that the Democrats committed fraud is disingenuous, as that poll simply does not show that data anywhere?
 
C

CaptainOblivious

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2019
Messages
2,535
buka001 said:
Like I said, what were the questions asked?

The question asked was




Since 61% said it is Not at All Likely, 39% of them ranged from not very likely to somewhat likely to very likely. So to say 30% of Democrats think that the Democrats committed fraud is disingenuous, as that poll simply does not show that data anywhere?
Click to expand...
You ignored the tweet because? :rolleyes:
 
B

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
Gnarls said:
Lol, Black Swan fallacy. No statistical anomalies exist because they haven't been presented to the court yet.
Click to expand...
Why have they not presented any of the evidence, if it purportedly exists and is the smoking gun?

I am not saying it doesn't exist, I am asking that if it was so obvious and serious, what are the reasons as to why it has not been presented.
 
surface

surface

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
26,596
Gnarls said:
Lol, Black Swan fallacy. No statistical anomalies exist because they haven't been presented to the court yet.
Click to expand...
In a way I agree with you here. I suspect strategy is to flood cases to SCOTUS and see if one sneaks through somehow. What I don't get is why are 6 republican judges not delivering on the bribes yet? Do you know ?
 
surface

surface

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
26,596
AfricanTech said:
Terrible judge of character - hope it's not a requirement for the role
Click to expand...
I agree absolutely. Shocking judgement.

But the fact that she wrote the letter means that she is definitely involved in such abuses, don't you think? That is probably what the honorable brit is saying.
 
DreamKing

DreamKing

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
14,483
copacetic said:
View attachment 971322

I have no desire to argue - I'm just curious as to the answer to my question is all. You've suggested I get back to you at points in the future, which I am doing.
Click to expand...

so today you still want to ask me about "evidence"?

are you blind or what?

that is why I am asking you what do you want to argue.
 
copacetic

copacetic

King of the Hippies
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
57,908
DreamKing said:
so today you still want to ask me about "evidence"?

are you blind or what?

that is why I am asking you what do you want to argue.
Click to expand...

All I did was to ask you if anything would change your mind, and you told me to follow up, which I did. I am not trying to argue with you. If nothing can change your mind, just say so?

Shall we revisit this on the day Biden become president perhaps?
 
DreamKing

DreamKing

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
14,483
copacetic said:
All I did was to ask you if anything would change your mind, and you told me to follow up, which I did. I am not trying to argue with you. If nothing can change your mind, just say so?

Shall we revisit this on the day Biden become president perhaps?
Click to expand...

no, more and more evidences, why I will change my mind?

biden and dems (and some traitors) will go to jail. I have no doubt about that. the only question is "when".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top