US Election 2020 - Lame duck days

[DreamKing]

Only CO speaks spasm, so the rest of us are waiting for him to translate.

translate what?

you leftists have been posting unstoppable memes, twitters posts, fake news, characters assassinations etc since the election started. why today you guys are so quiet? nothing to say now? why not do character assassination for that woman?

say something bad man. I am waiting.

 

[greg0205]

He's giving you a list of hypothetical responses that would discount the evidence being presented, and wondering which option you all are going to go with.

fact checked ==> fake news.
or
no evidence, I can't see any evidence.
or
that woman was ............ so that is a lie. she is a liar.
or
posts from twitter
or
meme
or
........ whatever......

Say what now?

 

[CaptainOblivious]

Say what now?

Option 1 :"Factchecker XYZ said it was fake news"
Option 2 : "This isn't evidence."
Option 3 : "The witness was wrong regarding ABC, she said a lie, therefore she is a liar, therefore don't trust anything she says."
Option 4: Quoting something someone said on twitter
Option 5: Meme response
Option 6: Other... <please specify>

How is that hard?

 

[DreamKing]

Option 1 :"Factchecker XYZ said it was fake news"
Option 2 : "This isn't evidence."
Option 3 : "The witness was wrong regarding ABC, she said a lie, therefore she is a liar, therefore don't trust anything she says."
Option 4: Quoting something someone said on twitter
Option 5: Meme response
Option 6: Other... <please specify>

How is that hard?

you don't even need to explain what it is.

when lefties have no argument, what they will do?

1) character assassination
2) personal attack
3) typo
4) grammar nazi.

how low the iq level will be if someone really doesn't understand what I am asking? guess?

 

[DreamKing]

And been rubbing the verkrampte Trumptards noses in it since Biden WON.

fake news. biden is still NOT the president-elected up until today.

 

[rustypup]

when lefties have no argument, what they will do?

You first need to make a defensible point, based on something verifiable, as opposed to the feelings, conspiracies and lunatic rantings of the mentally impaired incumbent you have such a raging erection for.

Everything else is playing silly burgers and worthy of nothing more than some uncomfortable laughter

 

[CaptainOblivious]

You first need to make a defensible point, based on something verifiable, as opposed to the feelings, conspiracies and lunatic rantings of the mentally impaired incumbent you have such a raging erection for.

Everything else is playing silly burgers and worthy of nothing more than some uncomfortable laughter

TIL video footage of the actual counting process doesn't constitute something "verifiable".

 

[greg0205]

I am still waiting one of you leftists to tell us ..

fact checked ==> fake news.
or
no evidence, I can't see any evidence.
or
that woman was ............ so that is a lie. she is a liar.
or
posts from twitter
or
meme
or
........ whatever......

Option 1 :"Factchecker XYZ said it was fake news"
Option 2 : "This isn't evidence."
Option 3 : "The witness was wrong regarding ABC, she said a lie, therefore she is a liar, therefore don't trust anything she says."
Option 4: Quoting something someone said on twitter
Option 5: Meme response
Option 6: Other... <please specify>

How is that hard?

you don't even need to explain what it is.

when lefties have no argument, what they will do?

1) character assassination
2) personal attack
3) typo
4) grammar nazi.

how low the iq level will be if someone really doesn't understand what I am asking? guess?

I... I... Jesus.

There isn't even a real question here, but I'll disengage my brain to try address your... I wanna say... 'points'.

1. Yes, when a fact checker tests a statement against verifiable facts and finds it's inconsistent with those facts; then reports the statement is, indeed, false... it can be classified as 'fake news', 'tho calling it a lie would be better.
2. If a fact checker finds no evidence to corroborate a statement it is, indeed, fake news. An absence of evidence is *not* evidence.
3. Absolutely, people lie. The last four years has given us folk like Michael Cohen who, I'm sure we can all agree is a liar. Thing is 'tho... When folk like Mikey cooperate with LE, *every* and I mean *every* claim he makes is investigated and confirmed or debunked by the very same LE. if a liar tells the truth and the truth is confirmed it's not... fake news.
4. Good lord no. If you're taking the word of RedHatPatriotMAGABaldEagle2867530926455 as gospel, you're the one with a problem. That said, many great journalists and, and I can't stress this enough, folk actually involved, have twitter accounts and they are great follows.
5. Good lord no. Memes are to make fun of y'all. Also, Jenna Ellis says 'hi'

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1331464377522851842

6. ??

 

[CaptainOblivious]

I... I... Jesus.

There isn't even a real question here, but I'll disengage my brain to try address your... I wanna say... 'points'.

1. Yes, when a fact checker tests a statement against verifiable facts and finds it's inconsistent with those facts; then reports the statement is, indeed, false... it can be classified as 'fake news', 'tho calling it a lie would be better.
2. If a fact checker finds no evidence to corroborate a statement it is, indeed, fake news. An absence of evidence is *not* evidence.
3. Absolutely, people lie. The last four years has given us folk like Michael Cohen who, I'm sure we can all agree is a liar. Thing is 'tho... When folk like Mikey cooperate with LE, *every* and I mean *every* claim he makes is investigated and confirmed or debunked by the very same LE. if a liar tells the truth and the truth is confirmed it's not... fake news.
4. Good lord no. If you're taking the word of RedHatPatriotMAGABaldEagle2867530926455 as gospel, you're the one with a problem. That said, many great journalists and, and I can't stress this enough, folk actually involved, have twitter accounts and they are great follows.
5. Good lord no. Memes are to make fun fo y'all. Also, Jenna Ellis says 'hi'

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1331464377522851842

6. ??

Um.

None of that addresses the damning video evidence Dreamking linked to in a meaningful manner. You're supposed to be picking 1 of those options in order to try to repudiate its legitimacy, because a failure to do so suggests an inability to do so.

 

[w1z4rd]

translate what?

you leftists have been posting unstoppable memes, twitters posts, fake news, characters assassinations etc since the election started. why today you guys are so quiet? nothing to say now? why not do character assassination for that woman?

say something bad man. I am waiting.

Talking about assassinations and associations, luckily your team got foiled otherwise there would have been a live beheading. Remember this?

Armed right-wing militia hatched a plot to kidnap the governor of Michigan and violently overthrow the state government, the FBI says

"Several members talked about murdering 'tyrants' or 'taking' a sitting governor," an FBI agent wrote in an affidavit.

www.businessinsider.com

 

[buka001]

Um.

None of that addresses the damning video evidence Dreamking linked to in a meaningful manner. You're supposed to be picking 1 of those options in order to try to repudiate its legitimacy, because a failure to do so suggests an inability to do so.

Why is the video damning?

 

[DreamKing]

I... I... Jesus.

There isn't even a real question here, but I'll disengage my brain to try address your... I wanna say... 'points'.

1. Yes, when a fact checker tests a statement against verifiable facts and finds it's inconsistent with those facts; then reports the statement is, indeed, false... it can be classified as 'fake news', 'tho calling it a lie would be better.
2. If a fact checker finds no evidence to corroborate a statement it is, indeed, fake news. An absence of evidence is *not* evidence.
3. Absolutely, people lie. The last four years has given us folk like Michael Cohen who, I'm sure we can all agree is a liar. Thing is 'tho... When folk like Mikey cooperate with LE, *every* and I mean *every* claim he makes is investigated and confirmed or debunked by the very same LE. if a liar tells the truth and the truth is confirmed it's not... fake news.
4. Good lord no. If you're taking the word of RedHatPatriotMAGABaldEagle2867530926455 as gospel, you're the one with a problem. That said, many great journalists and, and I can't stress this enough, folk actually involved, have twitter accounts and they are great follows.
5. Good lord no. Memes are to make fun of y'all. Also, Jenna Ellis says 'hi'

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1331464377522851842

6. ??

I want you to say something bad about the "evidence" we posted long time ago.....

I gave you some "options" you may (usually) use to argue how invalid our "evidence" is.

I don't expect you "to explain" about the "options" themselves.

 

[w1z4rd]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334344279305695232

 

[greg0205]

Um.

None of that addresses the damning video evidence Dreamking linked to in a meaningful manner. You're supposed to be picking 1 of those options in order to try to repudiate its legitimacy, because a failure to do so suggests an inability to do so.

Difficult...

First, because I haven't watched the clip mainly 'cos y'all are tinfoil proponents which brings me to...

B. I'm more than likely never going to watch any clip he ever posts because...

III. If it turns out to be legit and can be corroborated in a court of law, I'll be following the court case... 'Till then it's your hallucinatory rabbit hole and ain't nobody got time for that.

 

[greg0205]

I want you to say something bad about the "evidence" we posted long time ago.....

I gave you some "options" you may (usually) use to argue how invalid our "evidence" is.

I don't expect you "to explain" about the "options" themselves.

See my post #1120

 

[CaptainOblivious]

Why is the video damning?

I believe the video speaks for itself. Insofar as I'm explaining Dreamking's point to Greg, I'm going to let the video do the talking and wait for you to explain why what it says shouldn't be taken at face value.

Also ran across this yesterday, made me think of you:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334599420764151810

 

[scudsucker]

You're supposed to be picking 1 of those options in order to try to repudiate its legitimacy, because a failure to do so suggests an inability to do so.

This is Xarog's logic. Either address the insane lies, or - in his view - you must therefore concede that the insane lies are in fact true.

Sorry, Xarog, it doesn't work like that. Insane lies should be ignored with contempt.

 

[CaptainOblivious]

Difficult...

First, because I haven't watched the clip mainly 'cos y'all are tinfoil proponents which brings me to...

B. I'm more than likely never going to watch any clip he ever posts because...

III. If it turns out to be legit and can be corroborated in a court of law, I'll be following the court case... 'Till then it's your hallucinatory rabbit hole and ain't nobody got time for that.

Right, you don't care if the vote was fraudulent, you only care if they got caught.

 

[greg0205]

Right, you don't care if the vote was fraudulent, you only care if they got caught.

See scudsucker's post #1123.

 

[buka001]

I believe the video speaks for itself. Insofar as I'm explaining Dreamking's point to Greg, I'm going to let the video do the talking and wait for you to explain why what it says shouldn't be taken at face value.

Also ran across this yesterday, made me think of you:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334599420764151810

OK.

What experience, expertise or direct first hand knowledge do you have of the processes, procedures, equipment and methods that are used to process the votes?

The video does not speak for itself, as far as I have seen, as I do not know what I am looking at because I have no direct, first hand knowledge or experience in what they are doing.