US Election 2020 - Lame duck days

CaptainOblivious

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2019
Messages
2,535
OK.

What experience, expertise or direct first hand knowledge do you have of the processes, procedures, equipment and methods that are used to process the votes?

The video does not speak for itself, as far as I have seen, as I do not know what I am looking at because I have no direct, first hand knowledge or experience in what they are doing.
I'm not going to waste my time with your skeptard routine. If you watched the video, you would know that there was an expert witness breaking down the events in footage to explain to the audience what it means.
 

DreamKing

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
14,479
OK.

What experience, expertise or direct first hand knowledge do you have of the processes, procedures, equipment and methods that are used to process the votes?

The video does not speak for itself, as far as I have seen, as I do not know what I am looking at because I have no direct, first hand knowledge or experience in what they are doing.
@greg0205, you see that is the answer I am expecting.

just say, I don't know, I can't see any "evidence".

:D :D :D
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
OK.

What experience, expertise or direct first hand knowledge do you have of the processes, procedures, equipment and methods that are used to process the votes?

The video does not speak for itself, as far as I have seen, as I do not know what I am looking at because I have no direct, first hand knowledge or experience in what they are doing.
Careful buka... Rabbit holes be cray²

giphy.gif
 

DreamKing

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
14,479
I'm not going to waste my time with your skeptard routine. If you watched the video, you would know that there was an expert witness breaking down the events in footage to explain to the audience what it means.
@buka001

Republicans tender new CCTV footage to Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee​

 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,979
I'm not going to waste my time with your skeptard routine. If you watched the video, you would know that there was an expert witness breaking down the events in footage to explain to the audience what it means.
So you are not qualified to make any rational or reasonable judgement of what is happening, but expect others to stoop to you level of ignorance and make up stuff, like you do?

You always assume I don't watch the videos. It is the mother of all duck ups that you make.
 

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,118
Imagine having a problem with folk who...

Check

Facts

Y'all be like:
7f7f2882899755a705a2953b6fcfc263.gif

Let me guess, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the following to you:
A democracy.
For the people.
A republic.

Just because someone says they are a fact checker does not mean they are telling the truth.


With fact checkers, there is a bit of a problem: who checks the fact checkers? Better yet, how do they make money?

There is actually a pretty dishonest business model that exists between Facebook and third party fact checkers. Fact checkers on Facebook can pretty much arbitrarily designate a page as "fake news" and traffic from that Facebook page redirected to their website.
This means that they are incentivised to label everything and anything as fake news.

Candice Owens is suing some fact checkers over this particular practice. The post she made wasn't anything near fake news or a hoax.

This is what she said:
Important information for everyone to know about #coronavirus. Obesity is the number 1 killer in America. Right now, they are giving everyone who dies a Covid-19 lab test. If people die from heart disease, but were asymptomatic carriers of Covid-19, their deaths are counted toward the total. Same with other viruses an[d] illnesses. I am an asthmatic. If I die from an asthma attack today, and it is determined that I have Covid-19 in my system at the time of death, my death counts as “complications from coronavirus,” even if I never had any symptoms. They are trying desperately to get the numbers they need to justify this pandemic response.

Below is an article that explains how they are manipulating deaths. I spent all day today trying to look up daily death rates for any other diseases. You can’t get it anywhere. They are reporting ONLY on coronavirus deaths. I suspect if we begin to demand the daily death toll numbers for heart disease, we will observe a deep decline. I am most interested in NYC overall deaths for this past month (Not just from Covid-19). If anyone knows where we can get this information, please let me know. They
seem to be locking it down. If they can tell us how many people are dying from coronavirus daily— why can’t they tell us how many people are dying otherwise?
This was the article that she was referencing:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article...P4T1stxhKPCuGp0HgWb6SZ5cyBhMtJvn64p8fHJCZ0rXY

Is that a hoax or misinformation? It is very clearly an opinion, with something substantial backing it up.
 

CaptainOblivious

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2019
Messages
2,535
So you are not qualified to make any rational or reasonable judgement of what is happening, but expect others to stoop to you level of ignorance and make up stuff, like you do?
I'm qualified to conclude that what I observed and what was claimed is a plausible possibility, which therefore is deserving of scrutiny, and to be treated as such. The fact that you can't actually speak to the specifics, and instead engage in a meta-criticism of me because I had the temerity to explain to a second party what a third party was telling him, is hilarious. :ROFL:

You always assume I don't watch the videos. It is the mother of all duck ups that you make.
Says the guy whose responses show no indication that he is in fact familiar with what he is talking about. And I'm going to keep repeating the taunt until you prove it wrong. :D
 
Last edited:

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,118

CaptainOblivious

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2019
Messages
2,535
If you really want to trigger buka, just get him to watch this video.


That's a good find.

I seem to recall it was only weeks ago that he was last trying to argue that the Nazis were in favour of private ownership while conveniently overlooking how the Nazis nevertheless ensured that they remained in control of what other people owned. :sneaky:
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,979
I'm qualified to conclude that what I observed and what was claimed is a plausible possibility, which therefore is deserving of scrutiny, and to be treated as such. The fact that you can't actually speak to the specifics, and instead engage in a meta-criticism of me because I had the temerity to explain to a third party what a second party was telling him, is hilarious. :ROFL:


Says the guy whose responses show no indication that he is in fact familiar with what he is talking about. And I'm going to keep repeating the taunt until you prove it wrong. :D
Good, so you can keep ducking up.

Anyway, I see that Fox News is saying that it wasn't a suitcase, but a normal container for ballots and the Georgia Secretary of State has watched the video and not reported any problems with it.

Gabriel Sterling, who is a Republican voting systems implementation manager has also watched the video and says nothing is bizarre or odd with it.

Frances Watton, who is the chief investigator for the Georgia Secretary of state has also confirmed that those are standard containers for ballots.

So it seems that the experts on the matter have viewed the video and confirmed that there is nothing wrong here.

I guess it proves that you are not qualified to make an assessment of what you saw here.

What a surprise!
 

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,084

Trump finds a new target to blame for his election loss: The Postal Service he tried to destroy​


trump-afp-2.jpg


Donald Trump kicked off his Friday morning tweeting out an attack on the U.S. Post Office, saying postal employees “tampered” with ballots in an effort to ensure that he lost the 2020 presidential election to former Vice President Joe Biden.

Basing his accusations on an OANN report, the president wrote, “Whistleblowers reveal that the USPS is responsible for tampering with hundreds of thousands of ballots. @OANN This long time Democrat stronghold got rid of massive numbers, especially in swing states, during and before delivery of the ballots. Well documented evidence!”


The president provided no link to the report.


EoZVxkBXMAEL4Aa
Ja. I always thought this thread title was a typo. The guy always tries to blame someone else for his failures,and takes no responsibility for his own actions. These are the Blame Duck Days
 

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,084
Good, so you can keep ducking up.

Anyway, I see that Fox News is saying that it wasn't a suitcase, but a normal container for ballots and the Georgia Secretary of State has watched the video and not reported any problems with it.

Gabriel Sterling, who is a Republican voting systems implementation manager has also watched the video and says nothing is bizarre or odd with it.

Frances Watton, who is the chief investigator for the Georgia Secretary of state has also confirmed that those are standard containers for ballots.

So it seems that the experts on the matter have viewed the video and confirmed that there is nothing wrong here.

I guess it proves that you are not qualified to make an assessment of what you saw here.

What a surprise!

Get lost you. He's the foremost qualified lawyer since.... Rudi Guiliani. And has studied US electoral stuff since he was 3.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Let me guess, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the following to you:
A democracy.
For the people.
A republic.

Just because someone says they are a fact checker does not mean they are telling the truth.


With fact checkers, there is a bit of a problem: who checks the fact checkers? Better yet, how do they make money?

There is actually a pretty dishonest business model that exists between Facebook and third party fact checkers. Fact checkers on Facebook can pretty much arbitrarily designate a page as "fake news" and traffic from that Facebook page redirected to their website.
This means that they are incentivised to label everything and anything as fake news.

Candice Owens is suing some fact checkers over this particular practice. The post she made wasn't anything near fake news or a hoax.

This is what she said:

This was the article that she was referencing:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article...P4T1stxhKPCuGp0HgWb6SZ5cyBhMtJvn64p8fHJCZ0rXY

Is that a hoax or misinformation? It is very clearly an opinion, with something substantial backing it up.
First, good lord, who is still on genocide-enabling-democracy-murdering Fakebook?

I have so many issues with Marky Mark and the Fascist Bunch, but I'll tell you this... Y'all are so busy wailing and moaning about conservatives being fact checked and silenced, and cheering folk like Rafael Cruz being mean to them in Congress that you've missed the worst thing top happen to Fakebook since Marky started stalking girls online in '04.

Joe winning means Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders... It means anti-trust.

Democrats will carve Fakebook up into parts... All Republicans really want is to get shouty with Marky and Sheryl to look tough and get MOAR clicks... on Fakebook.

Let Candice sue 'em. Hope she wins.

Can we talk about the *real* fact checkers at the Washington Post now?
 
Top