Let me guess, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the following to you:
A democracy.
For the people.
A republic.
Just because someone says they are a fact checker does not mean they are telling the truth.
With fact checkers, there is a bit of a problem: who checks the fact checkers? Better yet, how do they make money?
There is actually a pretty dishonest business model that exists between Facebook and third party fact checkers. Fact checkers on Facebook can pretty much arbitrarily designate a page as "fake news" and traffic from that Facebook page redirected to their website.
This means that they are incentivised to label everything and anything as fake news.
Candice Owens is suing some fact checkers over this particular practice. The post she made wasn't anything near fake news or a hoax.
This is what she said:
This was the article that she was referencing:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article...P4T1stxhKPCuGp0HgWb6SZ5cyBhMtJvn64p8fHJCZ0rXY
Is that a hoax or misinformation? It is very clearly an opinion, with something substantial backing it up.