US Election 2020 - Lame duck days

The Trutherizer

The Trutherizer

Executive Member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
8,257
InfrastructureBilPage2700

InfrastructureBilPage2700

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Messages
1,320
The Trutherizer said:
That tweet is from 11 September 2019.
It's about cleaning up the voter roll.
So... I'm going to go out on a limb and say that... California's voter roll was... Squeaky clean by the time the election came about this year?
Click to expand...
Since you're too busy with being in serious denial to even click the link in the actual tweet, I'll help you out...

OCTOBER 16, 2020: "New Judicial Watch Study Finds 353 U.S. Counties in 29 States with Voter Registration Rates Exceeding 100%"

Don't worry, there's no fraud. :popcorn:
 
L

Lucas Buck

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
5,628
Temujin said:
My 2c(trigger warning, not for the faint hearted). By the time this is all done and dusted through SC
PA won't go to anyone(too farked, only thing they can really do short of starting from scratch is to just write EVs off)
GA will either be red, or also not to anyone(whichever, it won't be blue)
NV red
Still not sure if anything is going to happen with MI(will probably stay blue) and AZ(probably red)

Assuming GA doesn't go to anyone, MI stays blue, and AZ goes red, final result will be around Biden 254 to Trump 248
Assuming GA doesn't go to anyone, MI stays blue, and AZ stays blue, final result will be around Biden 265 to Trump 237
Throwing GA red in either of these doesn't help red unless MI goes red too, I don't see that happening, more likely MI EVs will not be counted either rather than going red

Whichever way, it looks like no one will get 270, and ends in contingent vote
Click to expand...
How does AZ go red? I don't see how that happens.
 
B

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
Temujin said:
My 2c(trigger warning, not for the faint hearted). By the time this is all done and dusted through SC
PA won't go to anyone(too farked, only thing they can really do short of starting from scratch is to just write EVs off)
GA will either be red, or also not to anyone(whichever, it won't be blue)
NV red
Still not sure if anything is going to happen with MI(will probably stay blue) and AZ(probably red)

Assuming GA doesn't go to anyone, MI stays blue, and AZ goes red, final result will be around Biden 254 to Trump 248
Assuming GA doesn't go to anyone, MI stays blue, and AZ stays blue, final result will be around Biden 265 to Trump 237
Throwing GA red in either of these doesn't help red unless MI goes red too, I don't see that happening, more likely MI EVs will not be counted either rather than going red

Whichever way, it looks like no one will get 270, and ends in contingent vote
Click to expand...
This is pure art. Framing this as a classic example of cognitive dissonance and cultism.
 
InfrastructureBilPage2700

InfrastructureBilPage2700

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Messages
1,320
Ek5xadD.jpeg
 
AfricanTech

AfricanTech

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
40,363
The Trutherizer

The Trutherizer

Executive Member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
8,257
DavidFreeman said:
Since you're too busy with being in serious denial to even click the link in the actual tweet, I'll help you out...

OCTOBER 16, 2020: "New Judicial Watch Study Finds 353 U.S. Counties in 29 States with Voter Registration Rates Exceeding 100%"

Don't worry, there's no fraud. :popcorn:
Click to expand...
Rofl. So I missed the link.
I don't give your messages much time. Because they are usually filled with nonsense.

In this case, on second glance, you don't disappoint. How the hell do you conflate the issue of keeping voter rolls up to date, an issue as old as modern democracy, with voter fraud?

Also I did go over the list of states in that link that have their voter rolls estimated to be out of date. Looks like a clear 13/13 split between Democrat and Republican states. (quick count. Don't bite my head off if I'm wrong by one or two either way) So that should already indicate to you that there was no bias. The damned states each keep their own voter rolls. You want them to keep them more up to date, then I suggest you go on a crusade to do so.

Furthermore. The voter rolls were for sure, FOR DAMNED SURE, no more up to date in the 2016 elections than they were this year. Nor the election before. Nor the one before that. Or that one. Or that one. Etc. Etc. Etc.

In fact it is likely that over time voter rolls are becoming more accurate as the world gets more and more driven by data. That said voter roll purges have become a contentious issue. Since some have sought to remove millions from voter rolls, not because they are deceased, or moved, but simply because they did not vote the previous election (unless they reregister).

But yeah in the end. How does an issue that all states, and for that matter countries that hold elections in general, struggle with - Now suddenly become "clear proof of voting fraud"?

Let me tell you - Because Trumptards are desperate to find any proof of fraud by Democrats. So they see it everywhere.

PS: California's indeed seems like it is squeaky clean. Texas however... Yikes.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top