SCOTUS cannot reverse a State Supreme Court on an issue of state law.Lol. Triggered.
Listen, I did not actually claim that any of the rulings were by activist judges. I simply said that such rulings would hurt the anti-Trump cause, which is plainly true. The fact of the matter is that the Supreme Court shows an indication of being willing to hear cases on their merits. Rudy telegraphed this aspect of the Trump plan weeks ago, before Sidney went off on her we-the-people mission, which is why all your hyperventilating about cases in the lower courts counts for zilch.
Lol. Sure, why don't you break it down for me how it's all going to play out?
SCOTUS cannot reverse a State Supreme Court on an issue of state law.
The first paragraph of this, probably tells us why...
Powell’s case included conspiracy theories about voting machines, several typos, and hundreds of voter fraud accusations that didn’t have any evidence.
In the case of the electronic voting machines, Powell accidentally cropped out the date of certification, in her accusation that there was no certification date.
“Additionally, I find that the plaintiffs waited to long to file this suit,” said Batten in his decision. “Their primary complaint involves the Dominion ballot marking devices. They say that those machines are susceptible to fraud. There’s no reason they could not have followed the Administrative Procedure Act and objected to the rule-making authority that had been exercised by the secretary of state. This suit could have been filed months ago, the timing that the machines were adopted, so that the plaintiffs waited over three weeks after the election to file the suit — there’s no question in my mind that if I were to deny the motion to dismiss the matter would be brought before the 11th Circuit and the 11th Circuit would reverse me. The relief that the plaintiffs seek this court cannot grant.”
He explained that the request to “de-certify” the election results isn’t even a possibility because the process for that doesn’t exist.
“Finally, in their complaint, the plaintiffs essentially ask the court for perhaps the most extraordinary relief ever sought in any federal court in connection with an election and they want this court to substitute its judgment for that of 2.5 million Georgia voters who voted for Joe Biden, and this I am unwilling to do.”
Listen below:
Jenna Ellis claims that the judge has granted them access to the voting machines to conduct a forensic audit. Crowder who constantly complains about the dishonesty of the msm, dishonesty says that dominion voting machines have been seized, in order to lend credence to the idea that dominion are guilty of foul play. Hypocrisy at its finest.
Yeah, the Doctrine of Laches disagrees with you and Kelly and that is why the PA Supreme Court ruled the way they did.
You know the claim is that the State Supreme Court's ruling violated federal law, right?
I mean... listen to this droning.Calling her robotic would be a disservice to robots everywhere...
Timestamp?Jenna Ellis claims that the judge has granted them access to the voting machines to conduct a forensic audit. Crowder who constantly complains about the dishonesty of the msm, dishonesty says that dominion voting machines have been seized, in order to lend credence to the idea that dominion are guilty of foul play. Hypocrisy at its finest.
Yeah, the Doctrine of Laches disagrees with you and Kelly and that is why the PA Supreme Court ruled the way they did.
Watch and see young padawan.
You mean this?Laches is an equitable defense, or doctrine. A defendant who invokes the doctrine is asserting that the claimant has delayed in asserting its rights, and, because of this delay, is no longer entitled to bring an equitable claim. Failure to assert one's rights in a timely manner can result in claims being barred by laches: it is a maxim of equity that, "Equity aids the vigilant, not the negligent."
However, delay alone is not enough to prevent a claimant obtaining relief. The consequence of the delay must be that it would be unfair for the court to give relief, usually because the defendant has changed its position because of the delay.
The party asserting laches has the burden of proving that it is applicable. Laches is distinguishable from the statute of limitation, which prevents a party from asserting claims after the designated limitations period has expired.
The telling bit here is how you're the one equating the 'WWC' with people who made racist and violent threats against a black legislator.Continue being flippant about real issues that affect the WWC. No wonder Democrats are poison across large swathes of America. I mean just look at the House Map.
View attachment 968280
Doesn't seem to get that...Still proves my point - Democrats are cloistered around a few big cities and that is all. Before Trump, Republicans had both the rural vote and a slimmer majority of the suburban vote (generally the areas surrounding the big cities).
Also, note how he qualifies it as the white working class, as if there aren't non-white working class people in the US.Only if you're uneducated, or wilfully ignoring facts like the tax cuts I mentioned, and bailouts for big business but not for workers.
I don't often watch Crowder's content, but it seems you're the one being dishonest. In that clip, Crowder starts off by saying a judge has ruled allowing them to seize the dominion voting machines and then plays the clip of Jenna Ellis saying the judge granted them access. Seems like you're reaching to call him dishonest by nitpicking about the specific word he used.Jenna Ellis claims that the judge has granted them access to the voting machines to conduct a forensic audit. Crowder who constantly complains about the dishonesty of the msm, dishonesty says that dominion voting machines have been seized, in order to lend credence to the idea that dominion are guilty of foul play. Hypocrisy at its finest.
Not the rich. Simply rich bastards who are more concerned with their own increased fortunes than working with the rest of the population of whatever country allowed them to have good fortune to start with.So why are rich people now voting for Democrats in large numbers?
Yes, I know it is uncomfortable fact as many Dems have an irrational hatred of the rich but you can't wish away inconvenient facts. Dems are the now the party of the urban, "woke" leftie rather than the farmer, oil worker or factory worker.