It has never been particularly insecure
glad you're not on my company's infosec team then, the holes are obvious and plentiful, in person voting means:
- you have full control over the physical ballot, no forgery / duplication or other nonsense
- you guarantee the one casting the vote is at least a living person, seeing as they have to show up to vote
- you can mark fingernails with ink ala South Africa and ensure nobody who has voted will vote twice
postal votes do not have the same guarantees and are therefore inherently less secure, again, you do not need proof of abuse to know it is less secure
Trump is just bullshitting as usual, you do know that but you're just playing his stupid game
Actually haven't followed what Trump or others are saying on the topic at all, so no I don't
"know that", I don't need to know it either in order to apply even basic logic to know one system is less secure than the other.
imo you'd benefit from ignoring the minute details as well, you seem fixated on the whole
"it has not yet resulted in mass fraud" mantra as if it means something, it doesn't