Cute, makes an massive sweeping statement disparaging the integrity of every journalist working in MSM and then shifts the burden of proof when called on it...
Lol, nice edit. I actually had to go watch the damn Crowder clip because of this back and forth. DavidFreeman isn't trolling though, and nor is he shifting the burden of proof. He's asking you to nominate a single journalist that you think is credible, and if you can't name one, his point stands. The fact that BadOrangeMan isn't the paragon of straight-talking is only disqualifying if you basically disqualify the entire MSM. But DavidFreeman isn't doing that. He is in fact welcoming you to read the news stories that these liars post and then do your own homework as to whether you agree with the conclusions. And you can do exactly the same with BadOrangeMan, even if it's only because you want to say OrangeManBad. And likewise for Crowder.
The information that Crowder has regarding the elections and the dangers of mass-mailing ballots without checks and balances in place is sound, even if he is a clown. If you disagree with it, why not actually challenge
what he said instead of noticing
that it was Crowder who said it?
OrbitalDawn fell afoul of the same point when he tried to use Rationalwiki to discredit Unz Review or whatever it's called without even bothering to click the link of what was being presented to him. The posts you keep liking in this regard all suffer from the same fatal flaw: A false premise of respectability is assumed with regard to the establishment and then that premise is used to discount all voices that aren't part of the establishment, but that kind of respectability has
never been an indication for the credibility of what is being reported.
The same thing obtains with Scudsucker who goes around telling people that he expects and acts according to objective evidence, when anyone paying even the smallest amount of attention can see that this is utter codswallop and just the bad faith sermonising of another high priest of "rationalism" who has become utterly dogmatic in the fight against dogma.
It's all part of the same pattern: make assertions and discredit anyone who disagrees with them without actually bothering to argue for the initial assertions in the first place. The way I see it, DavidFreeman isn't selling himself as a voice of truth and reason in this thread, he's just selling himself as someone who's sincerely willing to play the truth and reason
game. And none of you other posers are. All we see is character assassination attempt after character assassination attempt. If Crowder is not to be believed because he clowns around, then what are we to make of the forum posters who demonstrate an inability to do anything
but clown around? It seems the only thing one can do is to make fun of them.
I actually think that a large part of TDS/TAD stems from the fact that Trump is just
better when it comes to playing the character assassination game, and the people who can't play the truth and reason game simply can't stand the fact that they cannot compete.
Anyway, consider this post my version of a virtue signal.

But from where I sit, you guys do nothing all day but score owngoal after owngoal. And ironically enough you all seem to have a similar ideological/political vision of the world to the point where one starts to wonder if there isn't some kind of causal connection.