US Election 2020 - Pt 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
The last 24 hours on Fox have been a perfect encapsulation of Trumpism.

They confirm the Atlantic reporting and then have talking heads on to call it a hoax.

It's a cult.
Meh fox is pretty center. Not unbiased that would be different. They have left and right wing people on so they offer different bias opinions.

I prefer news to be unbiased, but fox is exactly the opposite of a cult.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
You are a global warming denialist, so from your perspective, that may be true, but from the perspective of most scientists, his pulling America out of the Paris Agreement was a harmful move. All because he felt intimidated by Macron, who is younger and better looking than him, something that his narcissistic ego couldn't handle.

The paris agreement was a non-binding useless agreement that only helps western countries that take that sort of thing seriously to shift their manufacturing over to China. It does nothing to stop global warming it just shifts it around. This is true according to most scientists who are not global warming denialists, like me.
 
Last edited:

scudsucker

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
9,024
The same thing obtains with Scudsucker who goes around telling people that he expects and acts according to objective evidence, when anyone paying even the smallest amount of attention can see that this is utter codswallop and just the bad faith sermonising of another high priest of "rationalism" who has become utterly dogmatic in the fight against dogma.
Ok Xarog.

Also, small "s", please.
 
Last edited:

Vrotappel

Bulls fan
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
25,982
Biden strongly needs to condemn BLM and its actions and needs to get his governors and mayors in line if he wants to win the election.
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
So Kelly is the source for the story on Trump and his views on the soldiers buried in the cemeteries.
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
confirmed?
Not specifically. But Trump has gone all ballistic on him, completely out of the blue and Kelly has made no public statements recently.

So it kind of begs the question as to why is Trump doing this?
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Yup , just the democrat kind of crazy is not the fun type you see in an Adam Sandler movie , its dangerous crazy like lying in the clip , or pedo agenda pushing ,or using murderers etc

Dangerous crazy is believing that people on the other side of the political spectrum support pedophile agendas
 

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
Dangerous crazy is believing that people on the other side of the political spectrum support pedophile agendas
So you can now follow up with your republican who supports pedo agendas.
I have a few other democrats that do , we can go 1 for 1 .

Bill CA SB 145 - The guy in pic is a democrat.
 

Attachments

  • 1599040005523.png
    1599040005523.png
    215.2 KB · Views: 10

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
So you can now follow up with your republican who supports pedo agendas.
I have a few other democrats that do , we can go 1 for 1 .

Bill CA SB 145 - The guy in pic is a democrat.



Legislation intended to improve sex offender database, end discrimination

Rather than enabling pedophilia, as the posts suggest, advocates say SB-145 will improve the sex offender registry.

That's why it had the support of the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault, the California Police Chiefs Association, the California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, the Crime Victims Action Alliance and Children Now, among others.

"The sex offender registry being a tool for crime solving in the future is only effective if the people on it are actually a threat to or a danger to their community," Garrett-Pate said.

"It strengthens the registry by making sure that it's usable because the people on it are actually people who are a threat to society, not a high school student who made a mistake," he added.
 

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277


Legislation intended to improve sex offender database, end discrimination

Rather than enabling pedophilia, as the posts suggest, advocates say SB-145 will improve the sex offender registry.

That's why it had the support of the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault, the California Police Chiefs Association, the California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, the Crime Victims Action Alliance and Children Now, among others.

"The sex offender registry being a tool for crime solving in the future is only effective if the people on it are actually a threat to or a danger to their community," Garrett-Pate said.

"It strengthens the registry by making sure that it's usable because the people on it are actually people who are a threat to society, not a high school student who made a mistake," he added.
So you left out this part on purpose then ?
A 24 year old man can now have sex with a 14 year old boy/girl and its up to the judge to decide if he goes on the register.
Seems like pedo acceptance to me.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
So you left out this part on purpose then ?
A 24 year old man can now have sex with a 14 year old boy/girl and its up to the judge to decide if he goes on the register.
Seems like pedo acceptance to me.

Correction:


Before SB-145, an 18-year-old male convicted of having oral or anal sex with a 17-year-old male would be required to register as a sex offender, while a 24-year-old male convicted of having penile-vaginal sex with a 15-year-old female would not be automatically required to register – it would be left up to the judge.

Garrett-Pate said SB-145 creates parity regardless of sexual orientation.
 

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
Correction:


Before SB-145, an 18-year-old male convicted of having oral or anal sex with a 17-year-old male would be required to register as a sex offender, while a 24-year-old male convicted of having penile-vaginal sex with a 15-year-old female would not be automatically required to register – it would be left up to the judge.

Garrett-Pate said SB-145 creates parity regardless of sexual orientation.
So do you support sex with minors then ?
This democrat certainly does.
How hard is it ? Just say sex with minors is wrong for any person to engage in and it should carry penalties including registering as a sex offender.
Its even more wrong when you consider the 10 year loophole Weiner added.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top