US Election 2020 - Pt 2

[Gnarls]

Buka isn't qualified to tie shoelaces.

FTFY since you're into ad homs now. I'd like to hear your thoughts on Dr. Li-Mengs pre paper.

Sadly though it works for people like you, who are so beholden to the idea that any criticism of Trump is illegitimate and therefore you must throw your hat into the pile, irrespective of its stupidity, to defend Trump, because TDS.

The very fact that Tucker had this lady on his show is to drum up propaganda in support of Trump and to distract people away from Trump and his lies on the virus.

Only Buka can conflate the origins of a virus with defending Donald Trump. You claim to be free from the TDS yet you drag Trump into every single conversation. You accuse Tucker of being a propaganda mouthpiece while ignoring the same from the sources you quote. This is almost as bad as your nazi obsession.

 

[konfab]

Tucker isn't qualified to tie shoelaces.

I have no qualification in virology, but the countless laboratories, the world over do. They have determined without a shadow of a doubt that it is natural.

Everytime they do an RNA sequence on it, they verify it. This is happening every day as they pursue the vaccine.

Just to be pedantic, it could still have been spread intentionally without being manufactured in a lab. They **could** have found it in a place away from the Wuhan wet market, then decided to release it there because it was an ideal place to release (low hygiene, high moisture, high density, but far enough away from Beijing). But if this was the case, there would be absolutely no way of determining whether this happened or not. You pretty much have to trust what the Chinese labs have to say about it.

As for motivation, there is a horrible one at that seeing how almost every single western country trashed individual rights in favour of group rights. If you wanted to shift the Overton window on this issue towards group rights, the reaction that happened as a result of the scaremongering would be a resounding success.

 

[Gnarls]

Just to be pedantic, it could still have been spread intentionally without being manufactured in a lab. They **could** have found it in a place away from the Wuhan wet market, then decided to release it there because it was an ideal place to release (low hygiene, high moisture, high density, but far enough away from Beijing). But if this was the case, there would be absolutely no way of determining whether this happened or not. You pretty much have to trust what the Chinese labs have to say about it.

As for motivation, there is a horrible one at that seeing how almost every single western country trashed individual rights in favour of group rights. If you wanted to shift the Overton window on this issue towards group rights, the reaction that happened as a result of the scaremongering would be a resounding success.

Precisely, but in this poor deluded fool's mind this is all about distracting from Trump's lies and 'owning the libs." Could someone please own him cause the lady doth protest too much methinks.

 

[buka001]

Just to be pedantic, it could still have been spread intentionally without being manufactured in a lab. They **could** have found it in a place away from the Wuhan wet market, then decided to release it there because it was an ideal place to release (low hygiene, high moisture, high density, but far enough away from Beijing). But if this was the case, there would be absolutely no way of determining whether this happened or not. You pretty much have to trust what the Chinese labs have to say about it.

As for motivation, there is a horrible one at that seeing how almost every single western country trashed individual rights in favour of group rights. If you wanted to shift the Overton window on this issue towards group rights, the reaction that happened as a result of the scaremongering would be a resounding success.

Except she didn't say that.

She specifically said it was genetically engineered.

This is the distraction. This is the propaganda.

 

[Gnarls]

Except she didn't say that.

She specifically said it was genetically engineered.

This is the distraction. This is the propaganda.

Lol, yes and this is why you investigate!

 

[konfab]

Except she didn't say that.

She specifically said it was genetically engineered.

This is the distraction. This is the propaganda.

That is why I said I was being pedantic.

And there is nothing fake about what has happened to individual rights as a result of the pandemic.

 

[CaptainOblivious]

Jordan Peterson's Murky Maps of Meaning

Peterson's book is weak as anthropology, psychology, philosophy, and politics.

www.psychologytoday.com

The opinion piece analysed Petersons videos. It provided historical context and rebutted the concepts and opinions of Peterson on the Nazis. You haven't bothered to read it, it seems.

I read the contents of the link. I wonder, why do you continue to pander to dishonesty?

 

[Tokolotshe]

FTFY since you're into ad homs now. I'd like to hear your thoughts on Dr. Li-Mengs pre paper.



Only Buka can conflate the origins of a virus with defending Donald Trump. You claim to be free from the TDS yet you drag Trump into every single conversation. You accuse Tucker of being a propaganda mouthpiece while ignoring the same from the sources you quote. This is almost as bad as your nazi obsession.

Now here is the clincher: Trump said Tucker can vote, Buka can't ...

 

[Tokolotshe]

Mind like a sharpened razor, others might say it's like a blunt hammer.

Now listen very carefully ...

 

[Pegasus]

Tucker isn't qualified to tie shoelaces.

I have no qualification in virology, but the countless laboratories, the world over do. They have determined without a shadow of a doubt that it is natural.

Everytime they do an RNA sequence on it, they verify it. This is happening every day as they pursue the vaccine.

That is how ridiculously stupid it is to bring on someone to the show who claims this.

Sadly though it works for people like you, who are so beholden to the idea that any criticism of Trump is illegitimate and therefore you must throw your hat into the pile, irrespective of its stupidity, to defend Trump, because TDS.

The very fact that Tucker had this lady on his show is to drum up propaganda in support of Trump and to distract people away from Trump and his lies on the virus.

Tucker interviews people from all sides.

Even people like you.

 

[buka001]

Precisely, but in this poor deluded fool's mind this is all about distracting from Trump's lies and 'owning the libs." Could someone please own him cause the lady doth protest too much methinks.

Not precisely.

She precisely said it was genetically engineered.

Here is precisely what she said -
" This virus, COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus, actually is not from nature. It is a man-made virus created in the lab."

She claimed you can see it in the virus' genome.

The very genome that gets analysed daily all over the world.

This genome had been shared publicly by various labs and verified independently by other labs. You can't fake RNA. Alterations in the RNA sequence are easily identifiable. Virologists would have noted this months ago.

If you dig into who is boosting this lone person's research, you find Steven Bannon and an exiled Chinese Billionaire. Rule of Law society and the Rule of Law Foundation are the ones backing her research (these names were on the title page of the paper when it was published to the non peer reviewed, open source site Zenodo). These two organisations have never published scientific reports before, now all of a sudden are boosting this?

Her study has not been peer reviewed.

Amazing how you claim to be virtuously trying to see if this is propaganda or not, but miss the obvious signs.

You accuse me, yet I have done far more digging into this paper than you have.

 

[buka001]

Lol, yes and this is why you investigate!

And if you investigated, you would see her paper has been supported by Steven Bannon's non profit organisation, who has zero expertise in virus science.

But here we are, with you giving air to propaganda, without taking one cursory second to verify anything for yourself.

 

[rietrot]

Just to be pedantic, it could still have been spread intentionally without being manufactured in a lab. They **could** have found it in a place away from the Wuhan wet market, then decided to release it there because it was an ideal place to release (low hygiene, high moisture, high density, but far enough away from Beijing). But if this was the case, there would be absolutely no way of determining whether this happened or not. You pretty much have to trust what the Chinese labs have to say about it.

As for motivation, there is a horrible one at that seeing how almost every single western country trashed individual rights in favour of group rights. If you wanted to shift the Overton window on this issue towards group rights, the reaction that happened as a result of the scaremongering would be a resounding success.

Then arguably if it was china and malicious they would release it somewhere else and not in their own country. If it came from a lab, then accidental release is the most likely.

But the carona itself is not so bad so I doubt it is something that escaped from a lab.

It just seems like the usual commie mismanagement of a crisis going way overboard and the rest of the world half shellshocked following in Chinas bad example.

 

[cerebus]

Another day, another credible sexual assault allegation against Trump for his classy and whole supporters to ignore:

Donald Trump accused of sexual assault by former model Amy Dorris

Exclusive: Amy Dorris alleges Trump forced his tongue down her throat and groped her at 1997 US Open

www.theguardian.com

A former model has come forward to accuse Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her at the US Open tennis tournament more than two decades ago, in an alleged incident that left her feeling “sick” and “violated”.

“He just shoved his tongue down my throat and I was pushing him off. And then that’s when his grip became tighter and his hands were very gropey and all over my butt, my breasts, my back, everything.

“I was in his grip, and I couldn’t get out of it,” she said, adding: “I don’t know what you call that when you’re sticking your tongue just down someone’s throat. But I pushed it out with my teeth. I was pushing it. And I think I might have hurt his tongue.”

Dorris, who lives in Florida, provided the Guardian with evidence to support her account of her encounters with Trump, including her ticket to the US Open and six photos showing her with the real estate magnate over several days in New York. Trump was 51 at the time and married to his second wife, Marla Maples.

Her account was also corroborated by several people she confided in about the incident. They include a friend in New York and Dorris’s mother, both of whom she called immediately after the alleged incident, as well as a therapist and friends she spoke to in the years since. All said Dorris had shared with them details of the alleged incident that matched what she later told the Guardian.

 

[Vorastra]

Tucker interviews people from all sides.

Even people like you.

Whoa, it's thin, hippy, American Harry Potter.

 

[Gnarls]

And if you investigated, you would see her paper has been supported by Steven Bannon's non profit organisation, who has zero expertise in virus science.

But here we are, with you giving air to propaganda, without taking one cursory second to verify anything for yourself.

So in other words not listening to the message because you don't like the messenger? I mentioned pre paper. Do you know what that is? A paper that has not been peer reviewed. How the fark do we know whether this is bs if it hasn't been peer reviewed yet. Oh wait, it has, by Buka01 PHD Virology from the University of Mybb.

Do you actually read my responses or do you just see my name and froth at the mouth like you do with Trump and Tucker?

 

[Pegasus]

Another day, another credible sexual assault allegation against Trump for his classy and whole supporters to ignore:

Donald Trump accused of sexual assault by former model Amy Dorris

Exclusive: Amy Dorris alleges Trump forced his tongue down her throat and groped her at 1997 US Open

www.theguardian.com

A former model has come forward to accuse Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her at the US Open tennis tournament more than two decades ago, in an alleged incident that left her feeling “sick” and “violated”.

“He just shoved his tongue down my throat and I was pushing him off. And then that’s when his grip became tighter and his hands were very gropey and all over my butt, my breasts, my back, everything.

“I was in his grip, and I couldn’t get out of it,” she said, adding: “I don’t know what you call that when you’re sticking your tongue just down someone’s throat. But I pushed it out with my teeth. I was pushing it. And I think I might have hurt his tongue.”

Dorris, who lives in Florida, provided the Guardian with evidence to support her account of her encounters with Trump, including her ticket to the US Open and six photos showing her with the real estate magnate over several days in New York. Trump was 51 at the time and married to his second wife, Marla Maples.

Her account was also corroborated by several people she confided in about the incident. They include a friend in New York and Dorris’s mother, both of whom she called immediately after the alleged incident, as well as a therapist and friends she spoke to in the years since. All said Dorris had shared with them details of the alleged incident that matched what she later told the Guardian.

Where is the credible part?



Why not post this pic with the guy with his arm around her?

Binn did not respond to a request for comment. However, according to Trump’s lawyers, Binn told them he had no recollection of Dorris telling him that anything inappropriate had happened with Trump or that she felt uncomfortable around him.

David Blaine and Leo miss it?

 

[rietrot]

So 40 years ago Trump tried to kiss this woman and she rejected him. Great. Why is this news?

 

[buka001]

So in other words not listening to the message because you don't like the messenger? I mentioned pre paper. Do you know what that is? A paper that has not been peer reviewed. How the fark do we know whether this is bs if it hasn't been peer reviewed yet. Oh wait, it has, by Buka01 PHD Virology from the University of Mybb.

Do you actually read my responses or do you just see my name and froth at the mouth like you do with Trump and Tucker?

Yeah and her pre-paper was sponsored by Steve Bannon.

Quite peculiar, since he has never dabbled in science before.

And why does she publish it on a open source site, instead of submitting it to actual scientific journals? Almost as if she wants to avoid some scrutiny.

 

[Tokolotshe]

Whoa, it's thin, hippy, American Harry Potter.

Why is his neck so longggggg. From all the looking out for the cops?