There was no attack in the first place, the US pulled a fast one to undermine our government and intelligence servicesIs the Russian yacht in SA?
And why would they warn a country because they abstained instead of embarrassing the country by letting the attack go ahead? Put on your thinking cap and take off the tinfoil hat.
There was no attack in the first place, the US pulled a fast one to undermine our government and intelligence services
Does it matter?Where is the proof that there was ever going to be an attack?
All I care about is the helicopter in the sky. That proves the US achieved their objective.The US can barely keep their own house in order, why should we believe them
This is about the Russian yacht and the abstaining from the Russian vote
So what?There was no attack in the first place, the US pulled a fast one to undermine our government and intelligence services
Do you think Intelligence agencies reveal their sources to the public? Rather a naive post from you.
Does it matter?
No, they cause a panic to the public instead.
Massive, it was just one helicopterThere was no attack because of massive security after the US warning. Is this logic difficult for you?
Not really, but there isn't proof either way.
What proof do you have to say there wasn't any proof?Not really, but there isn't proof either way.
Geez man, talk about The Victimhood!Read this article:
![]()
Thousands attend South Africa Pride march despite terror warning
US embassy identified Sandton district as potential target, but event went ahead after South African authorities insisted it was safewww.theguardian.com
Got to this part:
That is just sad in this day and age.
“We are always fighting for visibility and we are always in danger, so me hearing of the terrorist attack [warning], it didn’t even bother me,” said Anold Mulaisho, an LGBTQ activist, told AFP. “Either way, if I die my family already rejected me anyway, so no one is gonna get to miss me.”
What proof do you have to say there wasn't any proof?
We don't...Just seems strange, it's like SA didn't care anyway because things went ahead anyway.
Does mentioning there would be a terrorist attack make the terrorists go away or be more cautious? I guess we'll never know.
Just seems strange, it's like SA didn't care anyway because things went ahead anyway.
Does mentioning there would be a terrorist attack make the terrorists go away or be more cautious? I guess we'll never know.
The South African narrative was all over the show, from saying the US is just scare mongering to blaming them for letting 7 / 9 people get away being investigated.Just seems strange, it's like SA didn't care anyway because things went ahead anyway.
Does mentioning there would be a terrorist attack make the terrorists go away or be more cautious? I guess we'll never know.
No, they cause a panic to the public instead.
Saturday's blasts happened within minutes of each other, destroying buildings and vehicles in the vicinity.
The first hit the education ministry and then the second went off as medical teams arrived to deal with the aftermath, the Reuters news agency reports.
So the terrorists saw our superior and way advanced security forces and they got cold feet?There was no attack because of massive security after the US warning. Is this logic difficult for you?