cerebus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 49,122
Hint: Gnarls isn't referring to any questions or points I made.![]()
Hint: IDGAF. It's not my problem it's his.
Hint: Gnarls isn't referring to any questions or points I made.![]()
The fact that Trump doesn't want to go to Camp David isn't proof that he's corrupt like Zuma, sorry to tell you.Or they could just go to Camp David.
No, you're the dumbass shooting your mouth off where everyone can see it, thus it is your problem.Hint: IDGAF. It's not my problem it's his.
But he goes to venues that he owns, knowing that his organisation profits.The fact that Trump doesn't want to go to Camp David isn't proof that he's corrupt like Zuma, sorry to tell you.![]()
He goes to the same place he used to go before he was president. He's entitled to choose his location. Unless you can show that he's somehow cooking the books with respect to the bills, this is a nothingburger and in no way a sign of corruption.But he goes to venues that he owns, knowing that his organisation profits.
Goood for them.Other presidents have gone to Camp David or other venues in which they do not profit from.
BS.Conflict of interest and corrupt.
Do you have schizophrenia? At this stage this is the only thing I can think of to begin to explain your bizarre associations and logic and beliefs.Highly influential within the EU, I'd have to check with the IMF, but since it's largely the same revolving door bunch of people in most cases (Draghi, Lagaarde etc. etc.)...
Soros buys people and influence by funding their election campaigns. He's been doing it with DAs all over America lately. That's just how he rolls, one day you're going to have to come to terms with it.
![]()
George Soros’ Foundation Calls On Fox News To Ban Commentator Joe diGenova For “McCarthyite” Claim
Many conservative and right-wing media outlets covered the first day of the impeachment hearings by characterizing the process as a sham, a bust or boring. But one pundit’s comment stood out:…deadline.com
Soros will use whatever influence he can to push his agenda, including funding entire groups dedicated to producing political talking points like Media Matters.
Remind me again how the judge told Flynn's lawyer Sydney Powell off? Your claims of shark jumping are not to be taken seriously, especially now that you've decided to get yourself nicely ensconsed in the ad-hominem mud.![]()
Play the ball, Almighty.Do you have schizophrenia? At this stage this is the only thing I can think of to begin to explain your bizarre associations and logic and beliefs.
Do you want to dispute specifics, or are you going to simply sit there like a know-nothing chump advertising your ignorance to the world like Cerebus?Do you have schizophrenia? At this stage this is the only thing I can think of to begin to explain your bizarre associations and logic and beliefs.
Conservatives have known for a long time that Soros is a megadonor that influences the Democrats. But we had no idea just how much control he had over the Obama administration.
Now, the truth is coming out. During the 2016 Election, Soros was frequently consulting with the State Department.
What he was up to is staggering.
From The Hill:
Woah. According to this new report, George Soros appears to have had incredible influence in the Obama administration.In the spring of 2016, Team Soros marched to the top of the State Department to protect some of [his] investments, according to newly released department memos providing a rare glimpse into the Democratic donor’s extraordinary access to the Obama administration.
Citizens United have uncovered numerous calls, emails, and meeting requests from Soros to Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland during the 2016 Election.
His people had access, nearly direct access, to the State Department. One of his people was literally giving advice to Nuland, telling her what to do.
Soros gives as much as $1 billion a year to political causes. He has helped 2 dozen prosecutors get elected, trained fellows working at the State Department, and supports global media institutions.
Hint: IDGAF. It's not my problem it's his.
Then wtf did you respond?
So the United States has “the world’s highest rate of children in detention.” Is this worth reporting? Maybe, maybe not. Nevertheless, Agence France-Presse, or AFP, and Reuters did report it, attributing the information to a “United Nations study” on migrant children detained at the US-Mexico border.
Then the two agencies retracted the story. Deleted, withdrew, demolished. If they could have used one of those Men in Black memory-zappers on us, they would have. Sheepishly, the two news organizations explained that, you see, the UN data was from 2015 — part of a border crackdown that had begun years earlier.
We all know who the president was in 2015. It wasn’t evil, child-caging monster President Trump. It was that nice, compassionate, child-caging monster President Barack Obama.
Zap. The story made Obama look bad. Hence the story was removed. Not updated or corrected, removed.
I know it’s a heavy news environment. Who can keep up? But try to remember this one, because it’s instructive. People think news organizations flat-out fabricate stories. That isn’t often the case. Fake news is a problem that pops up here and there, but the much more systematic and deeply entrenched attack on truth is the casual, everyday bias of reporters.
AFP and Reuters deleted a story that was, in a narrow sense, true — that a UN study claimed the United States had some 100,000 children in migrant-related detention. The United Nations is horribly biased against America and the West. Still, on the level of lazy, news-release-driven journalism, the locked-up-kids story was minimally valid.
You see, showing just how far you are willing to bend over for Trump.He goes to the same place he used to go before he was president. He's entitled to choose his location. Unless you can show that he's somehow cooking the books with respect to the bills, this is a nothingburger and in no way a sign of corruption.
Goood for them.
BS.![]()
This is the future of Progressivism.
Obviously you can speak for him because it is your troll account?Scudsucker doesn't either. And nobody pays attention to anything GBM says. Dude is a veritable waterfall of shyte
The evidence doesn't show that he does, you just choose to interpret it that way. I've explained why you're wrong. You did nothing to rebut my points, in fact you're ignoring them and trying to talk over them.You see, showing just how far you are willing to bend over for Trump.
Starts off oh no he didn't.
Shows evidence, that he does
Oh so what, ROFL BS.
I was just agreeing with scudsucker's assessment of you
![]()
When the villain is Obama, not Trump, news suddenly becomes not worth reporting
So the United States has “the world’s highest rate of children in detention.” Is this worth reporting? Maybe, maybe not. Nevertheless, Agence France-Presse, or AFP, and Reuters did report it, attri…nypost.com
![]()
When the villain is Obama, not Trump, news suddenly becomes not worth reporting
So the United States has “the world’s highest rate of children in detention.” Is this worth reporting? Maybe, maybe not. Nevertheless, Agence France-Presse, or AFP, and Reuters did report it, attri…nypost.com
But we can totally trust Reuters to report all the facts as it pertains to the Biden case and not omit credible information that would damage the Dems, right?![]()
Greg is going to come along ANY second now and write some third rate piece about Trump putting children in cages. Do you recall the photo of children in cages that was taken in 2014 iirc? It's unbelievable how someone can be so blind to something, and then cry to the hills the next minute, but fail to acknowledge the historical and systemic issues. For a Boomer, it's pretty scary to think that his thought pattern is so emotive and unable to think without any further logic. It actually fills me with despair at how one sided people can be, because it really signals that these issues will never really go away. I also have to wonder if this **** is only coming out now, what else has been overlooked?