US Politics and Trump Category IV - I've never even heard of one that big before

[greg0205]

Very true, it was written by Eddie Scary. Mark Levin would have been somehow more credible

Y'all remember Eddie don'tcha?

He earned a well-deserved, galactic sized, twitter ratio for posting a creep shot of AOC.

 

[AlmightyBender]

Lol, do you think the opinion piece would somehow gain more credibility if it was attached to a sworn affidavit?

Then why does the senate not start a hearing and call these witnesses to testify? Nothing is stopping them.
Why didn't Congress go after this when it was under republican control?




Hint: because it is horse shyte

 

[AlmightyBender]

Y'all remember Eddie don'tcha?

He earned a well-deserved, galactic sized, twitter ratio for posting a creep shot of AOC.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Then why does the senate not start a hearing and call these witnesses to testify? Nothing is stopping them.
Why didn't Congress go after this when it was under republican control?

Hint: because it is horse shyte

Responding twice to the same post? Tsk tsk.

Also you should click on the Q post I just linked you to, there's 4 other Q posts connected to that one, 2 of them dealing specifically over the (legal)divide between senate and congress.

Watch the birdie...

 

[Temujin]

QMAP: [#3612] Time for Senator Graham, Chair of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, to Act

Be a part of the Great Awakening. Get real-time Qanon drops and POTUS tweets. We are the news now!

qmap.pub

Home | Sara A. Carter

Taking Back The Story

saraacarter.com

Dinners at the Biden mansion must be fun nowadays

 

[Temujin]

Dr Hill is rather hot.

She reminds me of Janssen playing Jean Grey

 

[Gnarls]

Since you took the trouble to actually open the article, perhaps you'd like to explain which part of his opinion is flawed, you know, all reasonable-like as a reasonable person would do.

Yeah, we're waiting with baited breath.

 

[AlmightyBender]

Since you took the trouble to actually open the article, perhaps you'd like to explain which part of his opinion is flawed, you know, all reasonable-like as a reasonable person would do.

Bait... And hooked!

Ok here's saying that nobody in the committee is saying that Russia didn't interfere in the election.

This opinion is flawed because of the republican committee members keep citing Russiagate, a term used to undermine Russian meddling in the US election.

Which is exactly what you also mean by that term as you have stated many times i.e. that it was Ukraine, not Russia that meddled.

So here is the opportunity for you GBM. Fiona Hill and all the other diplomats testified that Ukraine did not meddle, but Russia did. If you could prove they were all lying, which you claim you can, you can single handedly get them all arrested and locked up for purgery. I beg you, go for it.

Me waiting for you to go for it:

 

[AlmightyBender]

Yeah, we're waiting with baited breath.

You can breath easy now sunshine

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Bait... And hooked!

Ok here's saying that nobody in the committee is saying that Russia didn't interfere in the election.

This opinion is flawed because of the republican committee members keep citing Russiagate, a term used to undermine Russian meddling in the US election.

Which is exactly what you also mean by that term as you have stated many times i.e. that it was Ukraine, not Russia that meddled.

So here is the opportunity for you GBM. Fiona Hill and all the other diplomats testified that Ukraine did not meddle, but Russia did. If you could prove they were all lying, which you claim you can, you can single handedly get them all arrested and locked up for purgery. I beg you, go for it.

Me waiting for you to go for it:

Last I checked, being wrong and expressing your incorrect views sincerely was not a crime. Perjury involves intentionally misrepresenting the facts.

Unless you can explain why Fiona Hill would have to know exactly what the Ukrainians were up to, I don't really see why her testimony should be considered credible one way or another.

The fact that two Ukrainians were prosecuted for releasing Manafort's financial details at the urging of Andrea Chalupa who was working to further the Hillary Clinton campaign is defacto proof of Ukrainian meddling in the US 2016 elections.

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton.

www.politico.com

I've already brought this to your attention once before. No doubt you'll have forgotten it the next time you ask for proof.

 

[Gnarls]

You can breath easy now sunshine

Passing off opinion as fact is not explaining which part is flawed....sunshine. Weird how you guys get all smug but when you're fed your own medicine, thar be trolls!

Come back when you ackchyually have a proper argument.

I've already brought this to your attention once before. No doubt you'll have forgotten it the next time you ask for proof.

What has happened before will happen again.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

What has happened before will happen again.

REVEALED: Adam Schiff Connected to Both Companies Named in $7.4 Billion Burisma-US-Ukraine Corruption Case

As reported on Wednesday the head of Burisma Holdings was indicted this week in Ukraine! Ukrainian Prosecutor General indicted Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevsky. The claim alleges that Hunter Biden and his partners received $16.5 million over several years for their ‘services’ in Ukraine. Vice...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

And again...

 

[buka001]

I think it's going to be funnier when it turns out that he's as thick as thieves with the corrupt Dems regarding the pillaging of Ukraine.

And no, I don't think there's anything particularly anti-Semitic about what people have to say about Soros. People don't hate him because he's a Jew, although he does seem to like trying to play the Jew card to shut his detractors up.

I see tons of people hating him because he is Jewish.

 

[AlmightyBender]

Last I checked, being wrong and expressing your incorrect views sincerely was not a crime. Perjury involves intentionally misrepresenting the facts.

Unless you can explain why Fiona Hill would have to know exactly what the Ukrainians were up to, I don't really see why her testimony should be considered credible one way or another.

Because she is a very high level adviser within the intelligence cluster on Russia and Ukraine to the president with access to reams of classified information. Her literal job is research, understand and know about such events.

Are you really implying that the entire US intelligence agencies are somehow so incompetent they can't figure out something that gateway pundit somehow can? That seems.... Unlikely

 

[lumeer]

I love how Nunes says dossier, like a Southerner: dahsiérre.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Because she is a very high level adviser within the intelligence cluster on Russia and Ukraine to the president with access to reams of classified information. Her literal job is research, understand and know about such events.

Are you really implying that the entire US intelligence agencies are somehow so incompetent they can't figure out something that gateway pundit somehow can? That seems.... Unlikely

MORE LIES: Fiona Hill Who Worked for Soros and Is Linked to Chris Steele and Joseph Mifsud Insists She's "Non-Partisan" (VIDEO)

Adam Schiff’s closing witness Thursday in the Democrat impeachment show trials was Fiona Hill. During her opening statement Fiona Hill insisted she was non-partisan. Fiona Hill: "I take great pride in the fact that I am a nonpartisan foreign policy expert, who has served under three different...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

You make very good points. You are correct, she should definitely be suspected of perjury.

Edit:

Emails: Open Society Kept Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella Updated on George Soros's Personal Ukraine Activities

Eric Ciaramella, whom Real Clear Investigations suggests is the likely so-called whistleblower, received emails about Ukraine policy from a top director at George Soros’s Open Society Foundations. | Politics

www.breitbart.com

How come the alleged whistleblower, whom Fiona Hill was working with, was getting daily updates on Soros' activities whenever Soros was in Ukraine?

That's not at all unusual, now is it?

 

[TysonRoux]

Next Dump will tell Dr. Fiona Hill to "go back to where she came from".

Such and articulated gentleman.

 

[TysonRoux]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197564924517650434

 

[TysonRoux]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197613539701202944

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Durham Probe Expands to Pentagon Office That Contracted FBI Spy Stefan Halper

Justice Department prosecutor U.S. Attorney John Durham is questioning personnel connected to the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment, which awarded... View Article

saraacarter.com

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197655529163829248

Former FBI lawyer under investigation after allegedly altering document in 2016 Russia probe

A former FBI lawyer is under criminal investigation after allegedly altering a document related to 2016 surveillance of a Trump campaign adviser, several people briefed on the matter told CNN.

edition.cnn.com

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197668427059486720

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197684058547007488

Future proves past, bitchez.