US Politics and Trump Category IV - I've never even heard of one that big before

[rietrot]

Wat dis?

My turn to grammer Nazi?

 

[greg0205]

My turn to grammer Nazi?

It would be in keeping with your theme-of-the-day...

Sure, have at it.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Because what are facts, details and specifics really? Amirite?

Ja no, your team disqualified yourself from that game years ago already. Talk to the hand.

 

[cerebus]

My turn to grammer Nazi?

Rietrot: how can you say I'm a secret fascist?
Also Rietrot: the Nazis were right

 

[rietrot]

Because what are facts, details and specifics really? Amirite?

Why are you so happy with an empty Impeachment? It doesn't make sense.

Have you given up all hope and now just cling to this silly small symbolic victories?

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Rietrot: how can you say I'm a secret fascist?
Also Rietrot: the Nazis were right

Hitler was a vegan. Ergo all Vegans are Nazis. #CerebusLogic

 

[Unhappy438]

Rietrot: how can you say I'm a secret fascist?
Also Rietrot: the Nazis were right

Im not sure, he said he watches MSNBC.

 

[rietrot]

Rietrot: how can you say I'm a secret fascist?
Also Rietrot: the Nazis were right

Desperate times.

 

[rietrot]

Im not sure, he said he watches MSNBC.

*don't. It was in there.
Reading comprehension is a thing. Think about it for a bit.

 

[greg0205]

Why are you so happy with an empty Impeachment? It doesn't make sense.

Hafe you given up all hope and now just cling to this silly small symbolic victories?

I "haffen't"

There need to be checks and balances and impeachment is one of those checks and balances.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Because what are facts, details and specifics really? Amirite?

You know, Lumeer took such a nice redemptive step today, maybe I have been a little too hasty.

Former FBI lawyer under investigation after allegedly altering document in 2016 Russia probe

A former FBI lawyer is under criminal investigation after allegedly altering a document related to 2016 surveillance of a Trump campaign adviser, several people briefed on the matter told CNN.

edition.cnn.com

In the interest of facts, details and specifics, what are the implications behind the notion that the warrants on Carter Page were in fact illegal?

 

[Gingerbeardman]

I "haffen't"

There need to be checks and balances and impeachment is one of those checks and balances.

SCHIFF SHAM A BUST! Breaking Poll Finds Sharp Decline in Support for Pelosi-Schiff Impeachment Scam

If Democrats thought two weeks of DC bureaucrats pushing lies and conspiracies about President Trump and his phone call with the Ukrainian president would persuade voters that Trump is a criminal they were wrong. After two weeks of rigged testimony where Republican witnesses were blocked...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The Hill reported:

A new national survey finds independent voters leading a sharp swing in opposition to impeachment, the second major poll to produce those findings this week.
The latest national poll from Emerson College finds 45 percent oppose impeaching President Trump, against 43 percent who support it. That’s a 6-point swing in support from October, when 48 percent of voters supported impeachment and only 44 percent opposed.
More importantly, the poll shows more independents now oppose impeachment than support it, a significant change from Emerson’s polling in October. The new poll found 49 percent oppose impeachment compared to 34 percent who support it. In October, 48 percent of independents polled supported impeachment, against 39 percent who opposed.

Hope it was worth it...

 

[Unhappy438]

*don't. It was in there.
Reading comprehension is a thing. Think about it for a bit.

You said imagine you don't watch MSNBC, if you dont watch it then why must we imagine? Its certainly your comprehension that is lacking.

 

[buka001]

You know, Lumeer took such a nice redemptive step today, maybe I have been a little too hasty.

Former FBI lawyer under investigation after allegedly altering document in 2016 Russia probe

A former FBI lawyer is under criminal investigation after allegedly altering a document related to 2016 surveillance of a Trump campaign adviser, several people briefed on the matter told CNN.

edition.cnn.com

In the interest of facts, details and specifics, what are the implications behind the notion that the warrants on Carter Page were in fact illegal?

LOL there is your ego and your inferiority complex talking again.

 

[greg0205]

You know, Lumeer took such a nice redemptive step today, maybe I have been a little too hasty.

Former FBI lawyer under investigation after allegedly altering document in 2016 Russia probe

A former FBI lawyer is under criminal investigation after allegedly altering a document related to 2016 surveillance of a Trump campaign adviser, several people briefed on the matter told CNN.

edition.cnn.com

In the interest of facts, details and specifics, what are the implications behind the notion that the warrants on Carter Page were in fact illegal?

"Notion" you say? Is that like "perhaps"? "Possibly"? "One day"?

Sure investigate. If evidence rises to the level of prosecution, let's do that and see what a jury decides.

Until then it's not really proof of anything, is it? It's really more like another patch on your security blankie.

 

[rietrot]

You said imagine you don't watch MSNBC, if you dont watch it then why must we imagine? Its certainly your comprehension that is lacking.

Because maybe in Gregs world everyone watches MSNBC and I had to make it clear I don't understand his inside jokes.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

LOL there is your ego and your inferiority complex talking again.

Wtf is this even?

 

[Gingerbeardman]

"Notion" you say? Is that like "perhaps"? "Possibly"? "One day"?

Yes, instead of trying to claim that it is true, I'm offering it as a hypothetical. So assume that it is true for the sake of contemplating the idea.

What are the implications?

Sure investigate. If evidence rises to the level of prosecution, let's do that and see what a jury decides.

That's all fine and well. But if there wasn't a legal basis to investigate in the first place, then it means that the surveillance on Trump was...

Until then it's not really proof of anything, is it? It's really more like another patch on your security blankie.

Okay, so to clarify, the only way that you will accept that Trump was illegally spied on is when people have been found guilty by a jury, and not before?

 

[buka001]

Wtf is this even?

How you felt you deserved redemption.

 

[Unhappy438]

Because maybe in Gregs world everyone watches MSNBC and I had to make it clear I don't understand his inside jokes.

I see, don't worry, i often don't understand his jokes either.