cerebus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 49,122
Rome, Spain and Britain come to mind
and I didn't say hyperinflation
For the Roman Empire you could make the case. For the British Empire though? Inflation was never a serious problem, actually it can be argued that austerity and overly aggressive debt repayment did more damage to England in the 20th century than inflation ever did.
Amazon.com: Capital in the Twenty-First Century: 9781491534656: Piketty, Thomas, Goldhammer, Arthur: Books
Amazon.com: Capital in the Twenty-First Century: 9781491534656: Piketty, Thomas, Goldhammer, Arthur: Books
www.amazon.com
The most interesting example of a prolonged austerity cure can be found in nineteenth-century Britain. As noted in Chapter 3, it would have taken a century of primary surpluses (of 2-3 points of GDP from 1815 to 1914) to rid the country of the enormous public debt left over from the Napoleonic wars. Over the course of this period, British taxpayers spent more on interest on the debt than on education. The choice to do so was no doubt in the interest of government bondholders but unlikely to have been in the general interest of the British people. It may be that the setback to British education was responsible for the country’s decline in the decades that followed.