US Politics : Biden 100 days edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Again, that's not CRT.

Must be hard for people like @greg0205 , @OrbitalDawn and @cerebus to digest that a conservative SC justice made that argument because we are constantly told conservatives hate black people or something and want to keep them from living the American dream.
Or, and work with me here, the NCAA are, and have always been so garbage that even Clarence Thomas doesn't want any NCAA on him.
 

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,916
Again, that's not CRT.

Must be hard for people like @greg0205 , @OrbitalDawn and @cerebus to digest that a conservative SC justice made that argument because we are constantly told conservatives hate black people or something and want to keep them from living the American dream.

Using the Temujin reverse racism logic, Kavanaugh is in fact racist for his thoughts.
 

AlmightyBender

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
7,249
Again, that's not CRT.

Must be hard for people like @greg0205 , @OrbitalDawn and @cerebus to digest that a conservative SC justice made that argument because we are constantly told conservatives hate black people or something and want to keep them from living the American dream.
Not conservatives. Racists.

Though you can probably guess I'm gonna point out that there just so happens to be a rather awkward correlation between the two concepts...

In my books I'm also not gonna take a person's claim of being not racist seriously, when they choose to associate and stand shoulder to shoulder with clear and obvious racists. Yeah, just not good enough.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
In the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, Donald Trump advocated shipping Americans who contracted Covid-19 abroad to Guantánamo Bay.

The stunning revelation is contained in a new book, Nightmare Scenario: Inside the Trump Administration’s Response to the Pandemic That Changed History, by Yasmeen Abutaleb and Damian Paletta, two Washington Post reporters. The Post published excerpts on Monday.

According to the paper, at a meeting in the White House Situation Room in February last year, before the onset of the pandemic in which more than 600,000 have now died in the US, Trump asked aides: “Don’t we have an island that we own? What about Guantánamo?”

Trump also reportedly said: “We import goods. We are not going to import a virus.”
 

DA-LION-619

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
13,777
Yes, I was highly disappointed that there was political pressure to get an agreement signed before 2020 election, especially since the people who suffer the most from the opioid crisis are his supporters. Man, I just wanted to punch the book at that time. The Massachusetts AG came across very well in that book - it's weird red state AGs whose states were worst affected by the crisis weren't willing to go in for the kill.
I guess opioids aren’t part of the war on drugs
 

surface

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
26,596
That's horrible. Looks like random street crime though, not sure what you're getting at by posting it?
It is Temujin. It is probably to show you libtard that your people sponsored by black & muslim obama are terrorizing america and you still support him.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,700
I guess opioids aren’t part of the war on drugs

I don't know what point you are trying to make - is it the racial make-up of people who abuse opioids v other drugs? You do know the big difference is opioids are approved by the FDA, including the damaging Oxycontin? People can't be arrested for using it.
 

Tofu

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
519
Hahaha clearly it is you who are ignorant. Sorry to burst your loony echo chamber bubble.
Your lord and master, the Democrats, clearly are so woke that businesses are going broke..... frikken loony left.

Your arguments are hopelessly stupid. You seem to blindly accept the paraphrasing without any thought and then revert to your usual standard of calling everyone names.

You said: "If you steal something under $900 you can't be arrested"
Mostly you said this because you appear not to think critically about anything, but also because you want to build the strawmen that will allow you to call people names, the way you do. Whatever the case, your statement is false.

I pointed out that, once again, like i have done a number of times to your posts, you were being dishonest, which you were. I even added a link that would help you, but clearly you didn't bother with reading it.

You go and find a news article written by a right-winger and then just drink up his words without any verification of what he was saying.
"legalizing shoplifting"?? This should have raised a red flag for you, but you drank it up because you wanted to believe, despite the fact that i posted a link clearly stating that Prop 47 does not legalize it, it just reduces it from a felony to a misdemeanor (which, in case you need help with this, is not legal.) Let me know if you need to me to explain this to you again.
"prevents officers from arresting or stopping anyone who steals..."?? Once again... red flag for anyone who isn't rabidly invested in wanting it to be true. It's not.

You're supposedly christian. You're supposedly an adult. Try behaving like one. Try to avoid just swallowing anything that confirms your preconceptions and actually make some effort to evaluate whether a thing is true or not.
 

SoldierMan

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
9,416
Your arguments are hopelessly stupid. You seem to blindly accept the paraphrasing without any thought and then revert to your usual standard of calling everyone names.

You said: "If you steal something under $900 you can't be arrested"
Mostly you said this because you appear not to think critically about anything, but also because you want to build the strawmen that will allow you to call people names, the way you do. Whatever the case, your statement is false.

I pointed out that, once again, like i have done a number of times to your posts, you were being dishonest, which you were. I even added a link that would help you, but clearly you didn't bother with reading it.

You go and find a news article written by a right-winger and then just drink up his words without any verification of what he was saying.
"legalizing shoplifting"?? This should have raised a red flag for you, but you drank it up because you wanted to believe, despite the fact that i posted a link clearly stating that Prop 47 does not legalize it, it just reduces it from a felony to a misdemeanor (which, in case you need help with this, is not legal.) Let me know if you need to me to explain this to you again.
"prevents officers from arresting or stopping anyone who steals..."?? Once again... red flag for anyone who isn't rabidly invested in wanting it to be true. It's not.

You're supposedly christian. You're supposedly an adult. Try behaving like one. Try to avoid just swallowing anything that confirms your preconceptions and actually make some effort to evaluate whether a thing is true or not.

E-F-F-E-C-T-I-V-E-L-Y........
 

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,916
Aussie media right wing media is great.

rupert-murdoch-fox.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top