US Politics : Biden 100 days edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kieppie

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
cerebus said:
Man I am getting some SERIOUS bootlicker vibes from you. Why is it so hard to criticize anyone on your side? Why are you only ever capable of deflection?
Click to expand...
So criticizing idiotic partisan attacks is bootlicking?
It would require that I actually watch Tucker or listen to his opinions.

My side is squarely in the middle.

Show me where my interpretation of Tucker's words is deflection?
Or show me how Rupar's valuable "lol" or Popey's personal attack of others are arguing any valid points?
 
cerebus

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Kieppie said:
My side is squarely in the middle.
Click to expand...

you-aint-fooling-nobody-i-see-you.gif
 
Kieppie

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
greg0205 said:
Tucker: "Which seems sensible."

Everyone: Tucker literally said Nicki Minaj's tweet was sensible. Here he is saying it on video you can watch for yourself.

Kieppie:

BronzeVainHornbill-size_restricted.gif
Click to expand...
Yep I saw your little snippet. What did he say beforehand? Oh wait that is Rupar's whole shtick.

Lets wait until the follow up segment shall we? You'll probably watch Tucker and can come report back to the class.
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Kieppie said:
You're little while later falls flat Greggy. The message is consistent.
People are entitled to their opinions, but that does not mean one should listen to them or take them seriously.

yes Popey could do with a bit of schooling in libertarianism.
Click to expand...
Suuuuuuuuuuuure.....

 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Kieppie said:
So criticizing idiotic partisan attacks is bootlicking?
It would require that I actually watch Tucker or listen to his opinions.

My side is squarely in the middle.

Show me where my interpretation of Tucker's words is deflection?
Or show me how Rupar's valuable "lol" or Popey's personal attack of others are arguing any valid points?
Click to expand...
Kieppie: Some more proof that celebrities should not be listened to... Not even if you for some reason like their WAPs

Greg: Here's Tucker listening to Nicki Minaj.

Kieppie: No, no, no, no! He's just laughing is'all. Laughing, see! Laughing! Different crowd. Totally not agreeing with her tweet! No siree. Nope. Our Tuckems would *never* listen to a celebrity. Now way. Not ever. Nah-uh.

Kieppie: What's that? Tomorrow you say? Weeeeeeell, let's not dwell on that 'till it happens. okay?


beclown

Verb. To make a complete idiot of oneself in public. To behave or speak in such a way, or to make a comment or express an opinion that is so profoundly witless, senseless and obtuse, that you have forever after defined yourself as a person of comical value only. Never to be taken seriously again. Of worth only as an object of ridicule and derision.

Back it up, Kieppie. You've done enough self-harm for the day.
 
Kieppie

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
greg0205 said:
Kieppie: Some more proof that celebrities should not be listened to... Not even if you for some reason like their WAPs

Greg: Here's Tucker listening to Nicki Minaj.

Kieppie: No, no, no, no! He's just laughing is'all. Laughing, see! Laughing! Different crowd. Totally not agreeing with her tweet! No siree. Nope. Our Tuckems would *never* listen to a celebrity. Now way. Not ever. Nah-uh.

Kieppie: What's that? Tomorrow you say? Weeeeeeell, let's not dwell on that 'till it happens. okay?


beclown

Verb. To make a complete idiot of oneself in public. To behave or speak in such a way, or to make a comment or express an opinion that is so profoundly witless, senseless and obtuse, that you have forever after defined yourself as a person of comical value only. Never to be taken seriously again. Of worth only as an object of ridicule and derision.

Back it up, Kieppie. You've done enough self-harm for the day.
Click to expand...
No Greg. I posted Nicky to highlight her stupid view and the reach it has. I remember some here defending her WAP so apply that same standard?
Then you immediately jump to, "but look Tucker!" for some reason.
Yet Tucker is not agreeing with her anecdotal story. He's living rent free in your head though.

So yeah stay the clown Greg. Stay the clown.
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Kieppie said:
No Greg. I posted Nicky to highlight her stupid view and the reach it has. I remember some here defending her WAP so apply that same standard?
Then you immediately jump to, "but look Tucker!" for some reason.
Yet Tucker is not agreeing with her anecdotal story. He's living rent free in your head though.

So yeah stay the clown Greg. Stay the clown.
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/134787490526658561
 
RanzB

RanzB

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
29,562

Larry Elder Preemptively Concedes Defeat, Launches Voter-Fraud Site​


The site, which is paid for by the campaign, includes language that assumes Gov. Gavin Newsom had already won, though no results had yet been released and Elder is still campaigning. “We implore you… to join us in this fight as you are able, primarily by signing our petition demanding a special session of the California legislature to investigate and ameliorate the twisted results of this 2021 Recall Election of Governor Gavin Newsom,” the site says.
Click to expand...

Oh no :( Larry is also a grifter??? Sads....
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Kieppie

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
greg0205 said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1437737668700430336
Click to expand...
Michael at least gets to the heart of the matter.

They turned a recall election of a bad candidate into fearmongering. Who's to blame? The people that didn't vote on who should replace said bad candidate.

Pretty short sighted anyway as his term would only be one year.
And it could serve as a foil to rally support amongst dem voters during the next election. Now they'll just have a even more unpopular official come next election.
Then again it would look bad if a Democrat is unseated in a super majority state.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top