wbot
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2017
- Messages
- 9,696
Yeah shame man, Kamala worked so hard to put these people behind bars.Did he run this by Kamala?
Yeah shame man, Kamala worked so hard to put these people behind bars.Did he run this by Kamala?
Damn, Biden implementing three policies I actually support in recent months: investing in semi conductor manufacturing capacity in the US instead of allowing dodgy Chinese companies to own the market, building the border wall and decriminalizing marijuana usage.
Those first two sounds more like Trump type plans. Some people are still upset that he did not do the marijuana pardons in 2020.Damn, Biden implementing three policies I actually support in recent months: investing in semi conductor manufacturing capacity in the US instead of allowing dodgy Chinese companies to own the market, building the border wall and decriminalizing marijuana usage.
The person who should be pardoned is Julian Assange.Those first two sounds more like Trump type plans. Some people are still upset that he did not do the marijuana pardons in 2020.
Hope they just make sure none of those are pleaded down sentences as then it might contain violent offenders as well.
There's no way. Any president that tries that will end up like KenedyThe person who should be pardoned is Julian Assange.
Some updates on Kelly v MastersYeah, my reading of the polls is Lake is favoured in Arizona but the Democratic candidate for Senate, Mark Kelly, is well ahead of his GOP opposition, who I must be honest, needs personality bypass surgery.
I'm old enough to remember people screeching that trump will start a nuke war if he became president![]()
Biden's 'Armageddon' talk edges beyond bounds of US intel
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden’s warning that the world is at risk of a nuclear “Armageddon” was designed to send an unvarnished message that no one should underestimate the extraordinary danger if Russia deploys tactical nuclear weapons in its war against Ukraine , administration...apnews.com
The difference being they had more capable leaders back then with actual negotiations
Yeah I also remember that, as well as all the articles back then just like this oneI'm old enough to remember people screeching that trump will start a nuke war if he became president![]()
I'm old enough to remember people screeching that trump will start a nuke war if he became president![]()
With the cherry on top being that if you're against escalating tensions you're somehow a dirty MAGA supporterYup, WWIII trended so many times during his presidency. It's amazing to watch the Biden admin escalate nuclear tensions and no one here is saying anything...
I remember leftists losing their mind when Trump was elected saying he would start nuclear war. Funny how the senile retard and cackling harpy are the ones who are going to lead us down the path to nuclear war.![]()
Biden's 'Armageddon' talk edges beyond bounds of US intel
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden’s warning that the world is at risk of a nuclear “Armageddon” was designed to send an unvarnished message that no one should underestimate the extraordinary danger if Russia deploys tactical nuclear weapons in its war against Ukraine , administration...apnews.com
The difference being they had more capable leaders back then with actual negotiations
I remember leftists losing their mind when Trump was elected saying he would start nuclear war. Funny how the senile retard and cackling harpy are the ones who are going to lead us down the path to nuclear war.
Ah yes support Ukraine no matter what happens. Yes lets ignore everything that led up to this..."Lead us down the path" meaning supporting Ukraine so that the lunatic in Moscow is so publicly embarrassed by the debacle of his attempted takeover that he launches nukes to save his own face?
Fighting a half-arsed proxy war with a country that your allies depend on for energy isn't a particularly good strategy."Lead us down the path" meaning supporting Ukraine so that the lunatic in Moscow is so publicly embarrassed by the debacle of his attempted takeover that he launches nukes to save his own face?
Fighting a half-arsed proxy war with a country that your allies depend on for energy isn't a particularly good strategy.
The moment Putin mentioned nukes, the US should have parked its submarines in the Baltic. That is how this game has to be played.
The gas situation in Europe would be much easier as the US wouldn't have sabotaged its own gas industry under Trump . Which means it would have plenty of gas to export to Europe. Ceasing imports of Russian gas into Europe would make Putin's war very, very expensive, without hurting allies. In fact fuel prices wouldn't have taken a slump either. Which means that there wouldn't be the domestic economic pressure in the US right now that is going to pull military aid away from Ukraine.
To sum it up:
The US and Europe have a very weak negotiation position because of energy. You solve the energy problem and you counter his nuclear weapons, Putin has no option but the negotiation table.
Not to mention that Russia also has 10 ballistic missile submarines that could just as easily be parked on the US's doorstep..So your view is that if Biden had just parked nuclear subs on Putin's doorstep the moment Putin mentioned them, Putin would have been cowed into submission? And if they played hardball with Russia's gas supply, Putin would have been forced to negotiate terms? That is ludicrous. Putin would have treated nuclear subs as a declaration of war by NATO. And he wouldn't have been affected at all by more gas sanctions.